Letramento, discurso e gramática funcional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v11i2.10466Keywords:
New Literacy Studies; The Social Theory of Literacy; Critical Discourse Analysis; Ethnography; Systemic Functional Linguistics.Abstract
This essay aims at providing a proposal of theorizing on the interface between literacy, discourse and functional grammar, through the selection of the Social Theory of Literacy (Barton & Hamilton, 1998; 2000), in the New Literacy Studies, Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 1992; Chouliaraki & Fairclough, 1999) and Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday, 1994). It sets out from a discussion on the possibility of integration between the fields of literacy and discourse and carries on towards a dialogue with ethnography and functional grammar. At the end, some implications of this proposal for discourse and ethnography based literacy research are presented.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Barton, D. Literacy: an introduction to the ecology of written language.
Oxford,
U.K. and Cambridge, U.S.A.: Blackwell, 1994.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. Local literacies. London: Routledge, 1998.
. “Literacy practices”. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic
(eds.) Situated Literacies. London: Routledge, 7-15, 2000.
Baynham, M. “Code switching and mode switching: community interpreters
and mediators of literacy”. In: B. Street. Cross-cultural approaches to literacy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294-314, 1993.
. Literacy practices. London: Longman, 1995.
. “Narrative as evidence in literacy research”. Linguistics andEducation
11 (2), 99-117, 2000.
BROWN, G. & YULE, G. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1983.
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. Discourse in late modernity.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
Fairclough, N. Language and power. London: Longman, 1989.
Fairclough, N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press,
1992.
. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman, 1995.
Fairclough, N. “Multiliteracies and language”. In B. Cope & M.
Kalantzis. Multiliteracies. London: Routledge, 2000.
Fairclough, N. Language, Ideology and Power Research Group Seminar
on Text Analysis. Manuscript, 2001.
GEE, J. Social linguistics and literacies: ideologies in discourses. Basingstoke:
The Falmer Press, Taylor and Francis Inc., 1990.
Halliday, m.a.k. “Categories of the theory of grammar”. Word 17, 1961.
Halliday, M.A.K. Introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn, London:
Edward Arnold, 1994.
Halliday, M.a.k. & hasan, R. Language, context and text. Aspects of anguage in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1985.
Hamilton, m. “Expanding the new literacy studies: using photographs to
explore literacy as social practice”. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic
(eds.) Situated Literacies. London: Routledge, 16-34, 2000.
Heath, S. B. Ways with words: language, life and work in communities and
classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Keating, M.C. Routes through literacy: The lived experiences with literacy
of Portuguese women in London. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics
Department, Lancaster University, 2001.
Kress, G. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1989.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. Multimodal discourse. London: Edward
Arnold, 2001.
Lemke, J. Textual politics. London: Taylor & Francis, 1995.
Magalhães, I. “Práticas discursivas de letramento: a construção da
identidade em relatos de mulheres”. In A. Kleiman (org.) Os significados do
letramento: uma nova perspectiva sobre a prática social da escrita. Campinas,
S.P: Mercado de Letras, 201-235, 1995.
Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge,
1922.
Martin, J. “Analysing genre: functional parameters.” In F. Christie & J.
Martin (ed.) Genre and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and
school. London: Cassell, 3-39, 1997.
Pitt, K. The discourse of family literacy. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics
Department, Lancaster University, 2001.
RIOS, G. Literacy discourses: a sociocultural critique in Brazilian communities.
Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr Müller, 2009.
Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S. Language, bureaucracy and social
control. London: Longman, 1996.
STREET, B. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1984.
(ed). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
. Social literacies. London: Routledge, 1995.
Tusting, K. Written intertextuality and the construction of catholic identity
in parish community: an ethnographic study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis,
Linguistics Department, Lancaster University, 2000.
Van Leeuwen, T. “Representing social action”. Discourse & Society 6 (1),
81-106, 1995.
Van Leeuwen, T. “The representation of social actors”. In: Carmen R.
Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard. Eds.. Texts and Practices. London/
New York: Routledge, 32-70, 1996.
Wilson, A. Reading a library-writing a book: the significance of literacies
for the prison community. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics Department,
Lancaster University, 1998.
Oxford,
U.K. and Cambridge, U.S.A.: Blackwell, 1994.
Barton, D. & Hamilton, M. Local literacies. London: Routledge, 1998.
. “Literacy practices”. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic
(eds.) Situated Literacies. London: Routledge, 7-15, 2000.
Baynham, M. “Code switching and mode switching: community interpreters
and mediators of literacy”. In: B. Street. Cross-cultural approaches to literacy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 294-314, 1993.
. Literacy practices. London: Longman, 1995.
. “Narrative as evidence in literacy research”. Linguistics andEducation
11 (2), 99-117, 2000.
BROWN, G. & YULE, G. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1983.
Chouliaraki, L. & Fairclough, N. Discourse in late modernity.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
Fairclough, N. Language and power. London: Longman, 1989.
Fairclough, N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press,
1992.
. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman, 1995.
Fairclough, N. “Multiliteracies and language”. In B. Cope & M.
Kalantzis. Multiliteracies. London: Routledge, 2000.
Fairclough, N. Language, Ideology and Power Research Group Seminar
on Text Analysis. Manuscript, 2001.
GEE, J. Social linguistics and literacies: ideologies in discourses. Basingstoke:
The Falmer Press, Taylor and Francis Inc., 1990.
Halliday, m.a.k. “Categories of the theory of grammar”. Word 17, 1961.
Halliday, M.A.K. Introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn, London:
Edward Arnold, 1994.
Halliday, M.a.k. & hasan, R. Language, context and text. Aspects of anguage in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1985.
Hamilton, m. “Expanding the new literacy studies: using photographs to
explore literacy as social practice”. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic
(eds.) Situated Literacies. London: Routledge, 16-34, 2000.
Heath, S. B. Ways with words: language, life and work in communities and
classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Keating, M.C. Routes through literacy: The lived experiences with literacy
of Portuguese women in London. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics
Department, Lancaster University, 2001.
Kress, G. Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford
University Press, 1989.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. Multimodal discourse. London: Edward
Arnold, 2001.
Lemke, J. Textual politics. London: Taylor & Francis, 1995.
Magalhães, I. “Práticas discursivas de letramento: a construção da
identidade em relatos de mulheres”. In A. Kleiman (org.) Os significados do
letramento: uma nova perspectiva sobre a prática social da escrita. Campinas,
S.P: Mercado de Letras, 201-235, 1995.
Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge,
1922.
Martin, J. “Analysing genre: functional parameters.” In F. Christie & J.
Martin (ed.) Genre and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and
school. London: Cassell, 3-39, 1997.
Pitt, K. The discourse of family literacy. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics
Department, Lancaster University, 2001.
RIOS, G. Literacy discourses: a sociocultural critique in Brazilian communities.
Saarbrücken: Verlag Dr Müller, 2009.
Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S. Language, bureaucracy and social
control. London: Longman, 1996.
STREET, B. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1984.
(ed). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
. Social literacies. London: Routledge, 1995.
Tusting, K. Written intertextuality and the construction of catholic identity
in parish community: an ethnographic study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis,
Linguistics Department, Lancaster University, 2000.
Van Leeuwen, T. “Representing social action”. Discourse & Society 6 (1),
81-106, 1995.
Van Leeuwen, T. “The representation of social actors”. In: Carmen R.
Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard. Eds.. Texts and Practices. London/
New York: Routledge, 32-70, 1996.
Wilson, A. Reading a library-writing a book: the significance of literacies
for the prison community. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics Department,
Lancaster University, 1998.
Downloads
Published
2011-02-07
How to Cite
Rios, G. (2011). Letramento, discurso e gramática funcional. Papers of Language and Society, 11(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v11i2.10466
Issue
Section
Ensaios
