Normas de interação e de interpretação na atividade narrativa

implicações para o ensino/aprendizagem

Autores

  • Maria do Socorro Oliveira Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v5i0.6519

Palavras-chave:

Norms of interaction. Norms of interpretation. Narrative activities. Schooling.

Resumo

Based on ethomethodological analysis, this paper examines norms of speaking that guide narrative activities (norms of interaction) and the meaning that children can construct in these speech events, according to narrative experiences in which they have been involved (norms of interpretation). We demonstrate that the way in which these norms are established in the home/school contexts interferes in the schooling process, and the interactive and interpretative conventions can be identified as causes of success or failure in teaching/learning.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Maria do Socorro Oliveira, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Professora do Mestrado em Estudos da Linguagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte/UFRN. Cursou o Doutorado em Linguística na Unicamp, tendo defendido tese em 1994. Dedica-se, atualmente, ao estudo do gênero narrativo (oral e escrito), do letramento e da autoridade.

Referências

Bartlett, F. C. Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1932.

Bateson, G. Steps to an ecology of the mind. Nova York: Ballantine, 1972.

Chafe, W. Creativity in verbalization and its implications for the nature of stored knowledge. In: R. Freedle (ed.) Discourse production and comprehension.Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1977.

Frake, C. O. Playing frames can be dangerous: some reflections on methodology in cognitive anthropology. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Cognition, 1 : 1-7, 1977.

Fillmore, C. J. The need or a frame semantics within linguistics. Statistical Methods in Linguistics, 5 - 29. Stockholm: Skriptor, 1976.

Fillmore, C. J. An alternative to checklist of meaning. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123-132. Berkeley, CA:Linguistics Department, University of California, Berkeley, 1975.

Colby, B. Cultural patterns in narrative. Science, 151: 793 ”“ 798, 1966.

Goffman, E. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Nova York:Harper & Row, 1974.

Heath, S. B. Ways with words. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Heath, S. B. Separating “Things of the imagination” from life: learning to read and write. In: W. H. Teale & E. Sulzby (eds.). Emergent literacy: writingand reading. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex, 1986, p. 156-172.

Heath, S. B. e Branscombe, A. (Com C. Thomas). The book as narrative prop in language acquisition. In: B. B. Schieffelin and P. Gilmore (eds.).The acquisition of literacy: ethnographic perspectives. Vol. XXI. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex, 1986, p. 16-34.

Hymes, D. Models for the interaction of language and social life. In: J. J.Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.). Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography ofcommunication. Nova York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972, p. 35-71.

Hymes, D. Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Filadelfia:University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974.

Marcuschi, L. A. Análise da conversação. São Paulo: Ática, 1986.

Minsky, M. A frame for representing knowledge. In: P. H. Winston (ed.).The psychology of computer vision. Nova York: Mcgraw Hill, 1975.

Oliveira, M. S. Contar estórias: um evento de fala em análise ( umavisão etnometodológica do ato de narrar). Campinas, Unicamp, tese dedoutorado, 1994.

Schank, R. C. e Abelson, R. P. Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, N. J.: Laurence Erlbaum, 1977.

Tannen, D. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In: R. Freedle (ed.) New directions in discourse processing. Norwood,N. J.: Ablex, 1979, p. 137-181.

Tannen, D. The pragmatics of cross-cultural communication. AppliedLinguistics, 5 (3): 188-195, 1984.

Tannen, D. Frames and schemas in interaction. Quaderni di Semantica,4 (2): 326-335, 1985.

Tannen, D. That’s not what I meant! Nova York: William Morrow &Company, 1986.

Downloads

Publicado

2010-11-24

Como Citar

Oliveira, M. do S. (2010). Normas de interação e de interpretação na atividade narrativa: implicações para o ensino/aprendizagem. Cadernos De Linguagem E Sociedade, 5, 105. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v5i0.6519

Edição

Seção

Artigos de pesquisa