O envolvimento como estratégia para assegurar a compreensão

Autores

  • Isaltina Mello Gomes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v5i0.6516

Palavras-chave:

Interactional involvement. Scientific discourse in the press. Journalistic interviews.

Resumo

The main purpose of this study is to examine the function of ‘involvement’ in journalistic interviews with scientists that object to scientific vulgarization made by the daily press. We have used as our main theoretical foundation the studies by Chafe (1984, 1985). The Jornal do Commercio was chosen as the vehicle-target for this investigation because of its Ciência/Meio Ambiente section, published since 1989, with a specialized staff on environment, science and technology. We used four interviews for the analysis, which have allowed us to identify some characteristics of linguistic behaviour of the participants (scientists and journalists). Our analysis shows that, in this kind of interaction, more than a characteristic trace inherent to verbal interactions, ‘involvement’ is a strategy which aims to guarantee the comprehension of what is uttered.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Chafe, W. L. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oralliterature. In: Tannen, D. (ed.) Spoken and written language: Advances in discourseprocesses. Norwood: Ablex, 1984, p. 35-53.

Chafe, W. L. Linguistic differences produced by differences betweenspeaking and writing. In: Olson, D.; Torrance, N. e Hildyard, A. (eds.)Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, p. 105-123.

Dascal, M. Dez maneiras de ser incompreendido (e algumas sugestõespara evitá-las). Mímeo, s.d.

Dascal, M. e Weizman, E. Contextual explotation of interpretation cluesin text understanding: an integrating model. In: Vershueren, J. e Bertucceli-Papi, M. (eds.) The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 1987,p. 31-46.

Gumperz, J. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1982.

Marcuschi, L. A. O processo inferencial na compreensão de textos. Relatório apresentado ao CNPq: Recife, mímeo, 1989.

Taylor, T. J. Do you understand? Criteria of understanding in verbalinteraction. Language & Communication, 6 (3): 171-180, 1986.

Downloads

Publicado

2010-11-24

Como Citar

Gomes, I. M. (2010). O envolvimento como estratégia para assegurar a compreensão. Cadernos De Linguagem E Sociedade, 5, 76. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v5i0.6516

Edição

Seção

Artigos de pesquisa

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)