The Overflowed Liberal Norm: A Brazilian Contribution to the Anthropology of Law, by Luís Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.10159

Keywords:

Luís Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira, reply

Abstract

From an international perspective, the work of Professor Luís Roberto Cardoso de Oliveira is of first importance because of the object and the method. The text under discussion provides a synthetic view of his research which benefits the analysis of conflict management, the theme of the CAJU (Laboratory of Studies of Citizenship, Conflict Management and Justice) laboratory which he leads at the University of Brasilia, as well as of the vast network of InEAC (National Institute of Science and Technology of Comparative Studies in Conflict Management). These centers of research and collective learning demonstrate the strength of the anthropology of law developed in Brazil, that is widely open to other disciplines including, in addition to law, political and moral philosophy, political science and sociology. This anthropology does not only shed an outstanding light on the Brazilian situation; it also provides a general contribution to the anthropology of law, politics and morality from a comparative perspective covering North America, Europe and Brazil. Luís Roberto’s research clarifies an issue which, although share by the countries of the so-called global North and South, often divides them. I called it “The overflowed liberal norm” because of the various senses of the term “overflow”. It means extensions beyond the limits of what this normative order frames, the profusion of modes of normativity that this order cannot contain, and possibly – more clearly in the French term débordement – a violent attack. All of these three meanings are part of the topic, including the latter at a historical moment when democracies are once again revealing their vulnerability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Laurent Thévenot, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales

Honorary Professor (Directeur d’études) at the École des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris. Following his research on “social coding” and “investment in (conventional) forms” that contribute to the coordination of economic and social action, he co-authored with Luc Boltanski On Justification (2006 [1991]), which analyzes the most legitimate repertoires of evaluation governing political, economic and social relationships. The book has been influential in the new French social sciences (“Pragmatic sociology”) and in “Convention Theory”, a strand of Institutional Economics and Economic Sociology. In his further work (L’action au pluriel: Sociologie des régimes d'engagement, 2006), he offered an extension of the analytical framework of justification to deal with a plurality of ways people engage with the material environment and with others, from intimacy to the level of public conventions. This development has led to a critical approach to present day “governance by standards and objectives” and, in sustained cooperation with law scholars, of Modes of normativity and normative transformations (co-edited with Véronique Champeil-Desplats and Jérome Porta, Paris, L.G.D.J., 2020). This sociology of conventions and engagements has informed collaborative international programs comparing architectures of communities in Western Europe (European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, special issue on “Politics of Engagement in an Age of Differing Voices”, co-edited with Eeva Luhtakallio, 2018, 5(1-2)), Russia (Revue d’Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest, special issue on “Critiquer et agir en Russie”, co-edited with Françoise Daucé et Kathy Rousselet, 2017, 48(3-4)) and the United States (Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France, co-edited with Michèle Lamont, Cambridge University Press, 2000).

References

Berger, Peter. 1970. “On the Obsolescence of the Concept of Honour”. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie 11, nº 2: 339–347.

Boltanski, Luc, and Lauren Thévenot. 2020. “Críticas e justificações de a justificação”. In A justificação: sobre as economias da grandeza. Translated by Alexandre Werneck. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ.

Cardoso de Oliveira, Luís Roberto. 2022. “Ethical-Moral Rights and Conflict Management”. Anuário Antropológico.

Ferro, Marc. 2007. Le ressentiment dans l'histoire. Comprendre notre temps. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Thévenot, Laurent. 2019. “What engages. The sociology of justifications, conventions, and engagements, meeting norms”. La Revue des Droits de l’Homme, nº 16: 1–16. https://journals.openedition.org/revdh/7114

Thévenot, Laurent. Forthcoming. “Os passivos da humanidade comum”. In Questões de moral, moral em questão: Estudos de sociologia e antropologia das moralidades, edited by Alexandre Werneck and Letícia Ferreira. Rio de Janeiro: Mórula.

Published

2023-03-28

How to Cite

Thévenot, Laurent. 2023. “The Overflowed Liberal Norm: A Brazilian Contribution to the Anthropology of Law, by Luís Roberto Cardoso De Oliveira”. Anuário Antropológico 47 (3):76-81. https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.10159.