Archaeology in environmental licensing:
an ethnography of scientists and their bureaucracies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.3515Keywords:
Ethnography of archaeological practice, environmental licensing, anthropology of scienceAbstract
This paper have the objective of mapping the sociotechnical networks that compose and are composed through the processes of environmental licensing, on what regards the archaeological practices and the bureaucratic procedures related to them. Following scientists and their practices, bureaucrats and their documents, one can see how the constitution of the archaeological heritage is a phenomenon entangled by political disputes as much as by scientific theories and methods. This research is the result of a master's thesis, during which twenty-one archaeologists of different generations and with different experiences and positions were interviewed, as well as the analysis of sixty archaeological processes in environmental licensing for different enterprises in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Downloads
References
AUTOR. 2018. Título da Dissertação. Dissertação [Mestrado em Antropologia Social]. Cidade: Universidade.
AUTOR, CO-AUTOR. 2017. “Título do artigo”. Nome da revista, Vol, No: pp-pp.
BRONZ, Deborah. 2011. Empreendimentos e empreendedores: formas de gestão, classificações e conflitos a partir do licenciamento ambiental, Brasil, século XXI. Tese [Doutorado em Antropologia Social]. Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional
________. 2013. “‘O Estado não sou eu’. Estratégias empresariais no licenciamento ambiental de grandes empreendimentos industriais”. CAMPOS-Revista de Antropologia Social, Dossiê Antropologia e Desenvolvimento, 14, 1/2: 37-55.
BRONZ, Deborah; FRAIMAN, Ricardo. 2009. “Grupos de Interés: análisis crítico sobre el establecimiento del método en la gestión empresarial de los Grandes Proyectos Industriales del Brasil”. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, 1: 10-31.
BUENO, Lucas de Melo Reis. 2011. “Arqueologia, patrimônio e sociedade: quem define a agenda?”. Revista Esboços, 18, 26: 55-72.
CASTAÑEDA, Quetzil E. 2014. “Situating Activism in Archaeology: The mission of science, the activist, and the archaeological record”. In: Sonya Atalay; Lee Rains Clauss; Randall McGuire; John R. Welch (ed.), Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press, pp. 61-90.
EDGEWORTH, Matt. 2003. Acts of Discovery: an Ethnography of Archaeological Practice. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
________. 2006. “Preface”. In: Matt Edgeworth (org.), Ethnographies of Archaeological Practice: cultural encounters, material transformation. Oxford: Alta Mira Press, pp. xi-xvi.
________. 2010. “On the boundary: new perspectives from ethnography of archaeology”. In: Duncan Garrow, Thomas Yarrow (ed.), Archaeology and Anthropology: understanding similarity, exploring difference. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 54-68.
FERREIRA, Lúcio Menezes. 2010. Território Primitivo: a institucionalização da arqueologia no Brasil (1870-1917). 1 Ed. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
HULL, Matthew. 2012. “Documents and bureaucracy”. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41: 251-267.
JASANOFF, Sheila. 2006. “The idiom of co-production”. In: Sheila Jasanoff. States of Knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge, pp. 1-12.
REIS, José Alberione dos. 2010. “Não pensa muito que dói”: um palimpsesto sobre teoria na arqueologia brasileira. 1 Ed. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
RIBEIRO, Loredana. 2015. “Empreendimentos econômicos, violação de direitos humanos e o silêncio da arqueologia no Brasil”. Revista de Arqueologia, 28, 2: 172-186.
LATOUR, Bruno. 2004. “Por uma antropologia do centro”. Mana, 10, 2: 397- 414.
________. 2011. Ciência em Ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. 2 Ed. São Paulo: Unesp.
________. 2014. “Para distinguir amigos e inimigos no tempo do Antropoceno”. Revista de Antropologia, 57, 1: 11-31.
LOWENKRON, Laura, FERREIRA, Letícia. 2014. “Anthropological perspectives on documents: Ethnographic dialogues on the trail of police papers”. Vibrant, 11, 2: 75-111.
PELLINI, José Roberto. 2014. “Os sacerdotes da verdade: ética e o conceito de registro arqueológico”. Habitus, 12, 2: 291-306.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Anuário Antropológico
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en
Creative Commons - Atribución- 4.0 Internacional - CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en
