Responsiveness of the Brazilian broadcasting regulatory system of sanctions

Authors

  • Marcelo Barros da Cunha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v8i1.21527

Keywords:

broadcasting, regulation, sanction, responsiveness, enforcement

Abstract

Purpose ”“ The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the responsiveness of the system of sanctions applicable to broadcasting concessionaires in Brazil.

Methodology/approach/design ”“ The research considered the theory of responsive regulation proposed by Ayres and Braithwaite as parameter for the critical analysis of the Brazilian broadcasting regulatory system of sanctions.

Findings ”“ The research concluded that the system of sanctions does not encourage concessionaires to comply with its legal, contractual and regulatory obligations, as penalties do not promote dialogue between regulator and regulated firms. There are legal obstacles for the application of the maximum penalty of revocation of concession, and some fines imposed on concessionaires in the past could not be collected as they were barred by statute of limitations.

Practical implications ”“ The findings of this research may be considered by Brazilian regulators on the development of a more responsive and effective system of sanctions for broadcasting.

Originality/value (optional) ”“ The research introduces the discussion on responsiveness regarding the Brazilian broadcasting regulatory model.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marcelo Barros da Cunha

Possui graduação em Engenharia de Comunicações pelo Instituto Militar de Engenharia e graduação em Direito pelo Instituto de Educação Superior de Brasília. É especialista em Controle da Regulação de serviços públicos pelo Instituto Serzedello Corrêa/TCU. Atualmente é Auditor Federal de Controle Externo do Tribunal de Contas da União, exercendo a função de Secretário de Fiscalização de Infraestrutura de Aviação Civil e Comunicações.

References

AYRES, I.; BRAITHWAITE, J. Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

BRAITHWAITE, J. The essence of responsive regulation. UBC Law Review 44(3), 475-520, 2011.

CARLSSON, U. The Rise and Fall of NWICO: From a Vision of International Regulation to a Reality of Multilevel Governance. Nordicom Review, v. 2, p. 31-68, 2003.

CASTELLS, M. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

ONU ”“ ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos. 1948. Disponível em: http://www.dudh.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/dudh.pdf. Acesso em 6 nov. 2015.

RAMOS, Murilo César. Comunicação, direitos sociais e políticas públicas. In: PERUZZO, Cicília; BRITTES, Juçara (Orgs). Sociedade da informação e novas mídias: participação ou exclusão? São Paulo: INTERCOM, 2002, p. 123-130.

UNESCO ”“ ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO, A CIÊNCIA E A CULTURA. Many Voices, One World: Communication and Society Today and Tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO/London: Kogan Page. 1980.

The Law, State and Telecommunications Review Volume 8 Issue 1 2016

Downloads

Published

2016-05-16

How to Cite

CUNHA, Marcelo Barros da. Responsiveness of the Brazilian broadcasting regulatory system of sanctions. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. 61–80, 2016. DOI: 10.26512/lstr.v8i1.21527. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/21527. Acesso em: 28 jul. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2016): Law, State and Telecommunications Review / Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações

Section

Articles

License

By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,

I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).