The Antarctic Treaty System and the International Maritime Organization: institutional interplay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20889/M47e23005Keywords:
Antarctica, International Maritime Organization, Institutional interaction, Regimes complex, Marine pollutionAbstract
The work analyzes the process of institutional interaction between the ATS (Antarctic Treaty System) and the International Maritime Organization (IMO), regarding maritime transport and the prevention of pollution from ships in areas under the responsibility of the ATS, based on six elements: the recognition of competence; proficiency and risk dimension; the influence of State Parties; the environmental agenda; legislative convergence; and the suppression of sensitive topics.
Downloads
References
Böhmelt, Tobias, and Gabriele Spilker. 2016. “The Interaction of International Institutions from a Social Network Perspective.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16 (1): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9248-3.
Cabreraa, E. 2017. Japan’s Antarctic Whaling Policy, Time for Action for the Antarctic Treaty System. In. Antarctic Affairs, v IV, a. IV,.Editorial Agenda Antártica/ASOC, p.39-47.
Davis, RA. 2104 "The durability of the 'Antarctic Model' and Southern Ocean governance" (2014). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 1253. Disponível em:< https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/1253> Acesso em 12 maio 2021.
Dodds, k. 2011. Sovereignty watch: claimant states, resources, and territory in contemporary. Antarctica, Polar Record, Cambridge, v. 47 n. 242, p. 231-243, 2011.
Donehue, KJ. 2018. Shipping Governance in the Polar Regions: the Interaction of Global, Regional and National Regimes. The Arctic University of Norway Master Thesis Faculty of Law, JUR-3910, Master’s Thesis in Law of the Sea. Supervisor: Erik J. Molenaa.
Ferreira. FRG. 2009. O Sistema do Tratado da Antártica: Evolução do Regime e seu Impacto na Política Externa Brasileira. Brasília: Fundação Alexandre Gusmão, 248 p.
Gardiner, NB. 2020. Marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean: Is the Antarctic Treaty System ready to co-exist with a new United Nations instrument for areas beyond national jurisdiction? Maritime Policy, 122, 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104212
Gehring, Thomas, and Sebastian Oberthür. 2009. “The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (1): 125–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108100055.
Gerhardt, C; Almeida, J. 2005. A dialética dos campos sociais na interpretação da problemática ambiental. Ambiente & Sociedade, São Paulo, v. VIII, n. 2, p. 1-31, jul./dez.2005. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/asoc/v8n2/28605.pdf>. Acesso em: 23 maio. 2023.
Hemmings, AD. 2014. RE-justifying the Antarctic Treaty System for the 21st century: rights, expectations and global equity. In: POWELL RC.; DODDS K. Polar Geopolitics? Knowledges, Resources and Legal Regimes. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, p. 55-73.
LI Jingchang. 2018. New Relationship of the Antarctic Treaty System and the UNCLOS System: Coordination and Cooperation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 1814 th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018) A
McCreath, M. 2015. Protecting the Antarctic marine environment from the impacts of shipping Enhancing compliance with regulations for environmental protection and maritime safety. The Arctic University of Norway -Faculty of Law . Master thesis in Law of the Sea. Supervised by Erik Jaap Molenaar.
McGee, Jeffrey, and Marcus Haward. 2019. “Antarctic Governance in a Climate Changed World.” Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs 11 (2): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2019.1637679.
Nicckels, PP. 2020. Revisiting Bioprospecting in the Southern Ocean in the Context of the BBNJ Negotiations, Ocean Development & International Law, 51:3, 193-216, DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2020.1736773. Disponível em: < https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2020.1736773>. Acesso em 5 maio 2021.
Oberthur, Sebastian, and Olav Schram Stokke. 2011. Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. MIT Press.
Ovodenko, Alexander, and Robert O. Keohane. 2012. “Institutional Diffusion in International Environmental Affairs.” International Affairs 88 (3): 523–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01087.x.
Raustiala, Kal, and David G. Victor. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources.” International Organization 58 (2): 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036.
Sampaio, Daniela Portella. 2015. “O Sistema do Tratado Antártico: A consolidação de um regime internacional e o debate sobre seu déficit democrático.” Carta Internacional 10 (1): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v10n1.2015.186.
Santos, LEF. 2016. Cooperação e Conflito nas Regiões Polares: um cenário para o século XXI. 409 f. Tese (Doutorado) Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos Estratégicos Internacionais, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Orientador: Eduardo Ernesto Fillipi Porto Alegre.
Santos, LEF. 2017. As alterações dos Anexos do Protocolo ao Tratado da Antártica sobre Proteção ao Meio Ambiente: a constitucionalidade independentemente da não submissão ao Congresso Nacional. fls. 131. Dissertação de Mestrado em Direito. Centro de Ciências Jurídicas e Sociais da Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), orientador Sérgio Augustin. Caxias do Sul. Brasil.
Scott, KN. 2021. Southern Ocean Acidification and the Antarctic Treaty System. In David VanderZwaag, Nilüfer Oral and Tim Stephens (eds), Research Handbook on Ocean Acidification, Edward Elgar.
Stokke, Olav Schram. 2013. “Regime Interplay in Arctic Shipping Governance: Explaining Regional Niche Selection.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 13 (1): 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9202-1.
Triggs, G. 2006. Antarctic Treaty System: A model of Legal Creativity and Cooperation. In Science Diplomacy. p. 39- 49
Young, Oran R. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change – Fit, Interplay and Scale. Illustrated edição. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Meridiano 47 - Journal of Global Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
