A cultura de museu e a ameaça à identidade nacional na era do GATT
Palavras-chave:
identidade nacional, museus, GATT, comércio, arte.Resumo
O artigo revela as conexões que pode haver entre termos aparentemente tão disparatados quanto “cultura de museu”, “identidade nacional” e “GATT” ao mostrar e analisar como funciona o mercado de arte internacional. O foco principal é sobre as diferenças entre Europa e Estados Unidos quanto as políticas de proteção à arte endógena como forma de representação e preservação da identidade nacional e argumenta que acordos comerciais como o GATT terão que colocar esta questão em pauta no futuro próximo
Downloads
Referências
Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism [revised edition] New York and London: Verso.
Bator, P. M. (1982) The International Trade in Art Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Baumol, W.J. e Bowen, W.G. (1978) Performing Arts— The Economic Dilemma Cambridge: M. I.T. Press.
Bell Jr., W.J. et al (1967) A Cabinet of Curiosities: Five Episodes in the Evolution of American museums. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
Bergsten, C.F. (1974) Completingthe GATT: Toward New International Rules to Govern Export Controls'N'AsXm'gton. DC: British-North American Committee.
Clifford, J. (1988) . The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, <7»iMr/_Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Couplant, D. (1994) “Rem Koolhaas, Post Nationalist Architect’’ in New York Times (Sunday, Sept. 11) Art & Leisure, p. 45.
Frodon, J.M. (1994), “Cinema/Festival de Venise: Un entretien avec Woody Allen” in Le Monde (8 Sept.) p. 10.
Guilbaut, S. (1983) How New York Stole the Idea ofModern Ari‘Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grampp, W.D. (1989) Pricing the Price is: Art, Artists, and Economics NcwNork'. Basic Books.
Low, P. (1993) Trading Free: The GATT and U. S. Trade Police_{A Twentieth Century Fund Press
Highwater, J. (1976) “Seeing Indian Works as Fine Art”. New York Tinies (nov. 21), p.76.
Kammen, M. (1970) People ofparadox: An Inquiry Concerning the Origins of American Civilization. New York: Vintage Books.
Moulin, R.(1992)7 'Arttiste, I ‘institution, etle marché. Paris: Flammarion.
Netzer, D. (1978) The Subsidized Muse. Cambridge University Press.
Persick, L.J. (1985) “The Continuing Development of United States Policy concerning the International Movement of Cultural Propoerty”, Dickinson Journal of International Law 4( 1): 89-12.
Schlesinger, P. (1987) “On National Identity: Some Conceptions and Misconceptions Criticized” in Social Science Information 26/2:219-64.
Schott, J.J., org. (1990) Completing the Uruguay Round: A Results-Oriented Approach to the GATT Trade Negotiations. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
_____(1994) “The Pixils and Perils of Getting Art On Line”. The New York Times (Agosto 7) p.l.
Simmel, G (1955) Conflitctand The Web ofGroup-AffiliationsGXcncoc. II: The Free Press.
Simons, M. (1993) “With an Eloquent Guide, Dutch Discover history” [Amsterdam Journal] The New York Times (Março 17), p A4.
United Nations (1978) Treaties and International Agreements Registered with the Secretariat of the UN, Vol. 823:232-252.
United States (1982) Code Congressional andAdministrative NewsNoX. 4,97ft Congress, Second Session, Washington, DC.; USGPO: 4098-4111.
United States Government. CongressionalRecord Vo. 118-PartH.
Van den Buick e Van Poecke. “National Language, Identity Formation and Broadcasting in the Modern-Postmodern Debate: The Case of the Flemish and Dutch Communities”. Artigo preparado para Taal en Omroeps para Belgian Fundamentele Menswetenschappen nr. 2.0070.92.
VanElteren, M. (1994) “Reflections on Cultural Identity and ‘Americanization’ in Relation to the Cultural Dimensions of the Recent GATT Agreement”. Working Paper.
Yapko, B. A. (1987) “The Evolution of American Attitudes and Laws Regarding Ethnic Art and Artifacts”. Loyola of Los Angeles, International and Comparative Law Journal 9/3; 6A9-65I.
Zolberg, V.L. (1990) Constructing a Sociology of the Arts. Cambridge University Press.
Zolberg, V.L. (1993) “Remaking Nations: Public Culture and Postcolonial Discourse”. In Judith H. Balfe (org.) Paying the Piper: Causes and Consequences of Art Patronage. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade e Estado
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
