The Wellfare State and neo-corporatism: suggestions for a research hypothesis
Keywords:
.]Abstract
This article faces the challenge of defining the welfare State on the basis
of the different mediations from which social protection emerges. A discussion of
the typology of corporatism developed by P. Schmitter and of his definition of
neo-corporatism helps to show the way towards a dynamic and dialectic approach
to the neo-corporatist model taken as a theoretical hypothesis. This
would permit research in this field to avoid the risk of pressuposing one exclusive
reference model - the european one.
Downloads
References
ALALUF, M. 1985, “Work and Working Class” in Social Democracy and after,
Socialist Register, p. 455-475.
ASHFORD, D. 1989, “L’Etat-providence à travers L’analyse comparative des
institutions”, in Revue Française de Science Politique, n9 3, juin, p.
-295.
BERGOUNIOUX, A,. MANIN, B,. 1989, Le régime social-democrate, Paris:
Presses Universitaires de France.
CAWSON, A,. 1985, “Varieties of corporatism: the importance of the meso-level
interest intermediation” in Cawson, A. (ed), Organized Interests and
the State, Londres: Sage, p. 1-21.
COLLIER, D, COLLIER, R„ 1977, “Who Does What, to Whom and How: Towards
a Comparative Analysis of Latin American Corporatism” in J. Mallou
(ed), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America, University
of Pittsburg, Press, p. 489-512.
CRISP, 1984, La Sécurité Sociale Genèse, Mutations, Réformes, dossier
n9 19.
DOGAN, M., PELASSY, D, 1982, Sociologie politique comparativa, Paris,
Economica.
EWALD, F., 1986, L’Etat-Providnce, Paris: Le Seuil.
GERMANI, G., 1965, Polftica y Sociedad en una epoca de transicion,
Buenos Aires: Paidos.
IANNI, O., 1968, O Colapso do Populismo no Brasil, Rio de Janeiro: Civilização
Brasileira.
IANNI, O., 1975, A Formação do Estado populista na América Latina,
Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
JESSOP, B., 1979, “Corporatism, Parliamentarism and social Democracy”, in
Ph. Schimitter, G. Lehmbruch (ed). Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation,
Sage, Londres, p.185-212.
LACLAU, E„ 1982, Politics and ideology in marxist theory, Capitalism,
fascism, populism, Londres: Verso.
LAUTIER, B., 1989, La genèse de L’Etat-providence en Europe et en
Amérique latine, mimitisme, parodie ou voie alternativa?. Comunicação
apresentada no colóquio “Etat et politiques publiques: une comparaison
Europe-Amérique latine”. Brasília.
LEHMBRUCH, G., 1979, “Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict and the
New Corporation” in Ph. Schimitter, G. Lehmbruch (ed), op. cit„ p.53-61.
LEHMBRUCH, G., 1979, “Liberal Corporatism and Party Government”, ibid.,
p.147-183.
LIEBMAN, M., 1986, “Reformism Yesterday and Social Democracy Today", in
Social Democracy and after, Socialist Register, p.1-22,
MARQUES-PEREIRA, B., 1989, Néo-corporatisme et comparaison historique
entre I'Europe et TAmérique latine, Comunicação apresentada
no colóquio “Etat et politiques publiques: une comparaison Europe-Amérique
latine”: Brasilia.
MARQUES-PEREIRA, B., 1990, “La Dynamique du compromis social-démocrate",
Sociologie du Travail.
MARQUES-PEREIRA, J., 1989, Politiques sociales, marché du travail et
légitimité au Brésil, comunicação no colóquio “Etat et politiques publiques:
une comparaison Europe-Amérique latine”: Brasilia.
MILIBAND, R., 1969, L’Etat dans société capitaliste, Paris: Maspéro.
NEDELMANN, B., MEIER, K„ 1979, “Theories of Contemporary Corporatism
Static or Dynamic?”, in Ph. Schimitter, G. Lehmbruch (ed), op.
cit. p.95-118.
O‘DONNEL, G., 1977, “Corporatism and the question of the State” in J. Malloy
(ed), op. cit, p. 47-88.
POULANTZAS, N, 1968, Pouvoir politique et classes sociales, Paris:
Maspéro.
PANITCH, L, 1979, “The Development of Corporatism in Liberal Democracies”,
in Ph. Schmitter, G. Lehmbruch (eds), op. cit, p.119-146.
RANGEON, F„ 1986, fidéologie de l'ntérét général, Paris: Economica.
RIVIERE D'ARC, H„ 1989, Plaidoyer pour des études de cas, comunicação
apresentada no colóquio “Etat et politiques publiques: une comparaison
Europe-Amérique latine": Brasilia.
ROUQUIE, A, 1987, Amérique latine Introduction à Extrême Occident
Paris: Seuil.
SCHMITTER, Ph., 1971, Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil,
Stanford: Standford University Press.
SHIMITTER, Ph., 1979, “Still the Century of Corporatism" in Ph. Schimitter, G.
Lehmbruch (eds), op. cit p. 7-51.
SCHMITTER, Ph., 1979, “Modes of Interes Intermediation. Models of Societal
Change in Western Europe”, ibid, p.63-93.
SERRANO, F, ARRIOLA, J., 1988, Estado y política Social en la Economia
Espanola, comunicação apresentada no colóquio “Etat et publiques:
une comparaison Europe-Amérique latine”: Brasilia.
TOURAINE, A., 1988, La Parole et le Sang: Politique et Société en Amérique
Latine, Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
Weffort, F„ 1973 “Classes sociales y desarrollo social (Contribucion al estudio
del polupismo)”, in A. Quijano, F. Weffort, Populism, marginalidad
y dependencia, Costa Rica.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade e Estado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
