Preditores do Ajustamento na Aposentadoria
Estudo Comparativo Entre Ocupações
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39512.enPalavras-chave:
Interesses profissionais, Ajustamento, Aposentadoria, PersonalidadeResumo
Esta pesquisa investigou diferenças no ajustamento à aposentadoria entre trabalhadores de ocupações classificadas na tipologia RIASEC. A literatura informa que esse ajustamento varia na dependência do acesso individual a recursos tais como saúde, finanças e atributos pessoais. Participaram 469 aposentados, 65% mulheres, idades entre 47 e 88 anos, que responderam ao Inventário de Recursos para Aposentadoria, a Escala de Domínio Pearlin e informaram dados demográficos. As análises revelaram que aposentados de ocupações sociais e investigativas possuem mais recursos e maior ajustamento na aposentadoria. Aposentados de ocupações realistas revelaram uma perspectiva desfavorável. Senso de domínio se revelou o preditor mais importante do ajustamento. Os resultados indicam que os recursos de ajustamento na aposentadoria variam entre trabalhadores em diferentes tipos de ocupação.
Downloads
Referências
Amorim, S. M., & França, L. H. D. F. P. (2019). Validity evidence of the Retirement Resources Inventory. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22(e23), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.23
Atchley, R. C. (1999).Continuity and adaptation in aging: Creating positive experiences Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801861222
Barbosa, L. M., Monteiro, B., & Murta, S. G. (2016). Retirement adjustment predictors: A systematic review. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw008
Brito, F. S., & Magalhães, M. O. (2017). Assessment of occupational environments: construction of the Occupational Classification Inventory. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 18, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.26707/1984-7270/2017v18n1p93
Cox, H. G. (2015). Later life: The realities of aging (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663715
Donaldson, T., Earl, J. K., & Muratore, A. M. (2010). Exploring the influence of mastery, planning and conditions of workforce exit on retirement adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.03.003
Drewelies, J., Wagner, J., Tesch-Römer, C., Heckhausen, J., & Gerstorf, D. (2017). Perceived control across the second half of life: The role of physical health and social integration.Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 76-92.https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000143
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-241. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304
Foutch, H., McHugh, E. R., Bertoch, S. C., & Reardon, R. C. (2014). Creating and using a database on Holland’s theory and practical tools. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(1), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713492947
França, L. H. F. P., & Hershey, D. (2018). Financial preparation for retirement in Brazil: A cross-cultural test for interdisciplinary financial planning model. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 33(2), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-018-9343-y
Gilbet, P. (2016). Depression: The evolution of powerlessness Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315564319
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments Psychological Assessment Resources.
Hudson, N. W., Roberts, B. W., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2012). Personality trait development and social investment in work. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.002
Infurna, F. J., & Mayer, A. (2015). The effects of constraints and mastery on mental and physical health: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Psychology and Aging, 30, 432-448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039050
Kajitani, S., Sakata, K., & McKenzie, C. (2017). Occupation, retirement and cognitive functioning. Ageing & Society, 37(8), 1568-1596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000465
Knafo, A., & Sagiv, L. (2004). Values and work environment: Mapping 32 occupations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(3), 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173223
Le, K., Donnellan, M. B., & Conger, R. (2014). Personality development at work: Workplace conditions, personality changes, and the corresponsive principle. Journal of Personality, 82(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12032
Lee, W. J., Chen, L. K., Peng, L. N., Chiou, S. T., & Chou, P. (2016). Personal mastery attenuates the adverse effect of frailty on declines in physical function of older people: A 6-year population-based cohort study. Medicine, 95(34), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004661
Lee, W. J., Liang, C. K., Peng, L. N., Chiou, S. T., & Chen, L. K. (2017). Protective factors against cognitive decline among community-dwelling middle-aged and older people in Taiwan: A 6-year national population-based study. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 17, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13041
Leung, C. S. Y., & Earl, J. K. (2012). Retirement Resources Inventory: Construction, factor structure and psychometric properties. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.06.005
Magalhães, M. O. (2012). Relations between occupational interests’ types and psychological basis of organizational commitment. Psico-USF, 17, 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712012000100012
National Center for O*NET Development. (n.d.). O*NET OnLine. U.S. Department of Labor. Retrieved October 4, 2021, from Retrieved October 4, 2021, fromhttps://www.onetonline.org/
Nye, D., & Rounds, J. (2019). Vocational interests in the workplace: Rethinking behavior at work Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678924
Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136319
Sackett, P. R., Lievens, F., Van Iddekinge, C. H., & Kuncel, N. R. (2017). Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 254-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000151
Sagiv, L. (2002). Vocational interests and basic values. Journal of Career Assessment, 10(2), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072702010002007
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
Soh, S., & Leong, F. T. L. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of Holland's theory in Singapore: Beyond structural validity of RIASEC. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907270100900202
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Venz, L., & Wang, M. (2019). The importance of interests for understanding retirement. In C. D. Nye, & J. Rounds (Eds.), Vocational interests in the workplace: Rethinking behavior at work (pp. 165-188). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678924-9
Wang, M., & Shultz, K. S. (2010). Employee retirement: A review and recommendations for future investigation. Journal of Management, 36, 172-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309347957
Wang, M., & Wanberg, C. R. (2017). 100 years of applied psychology research on individual careers: From career management to retirement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 546-563. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/apl0000143
Wells, Y., De Vaus, D., Kendig, H., Quine, S., & Petralia, W. (2006). Healthy retirement project[Technical Paper]. Lincoln Centre for Ageing and Community Care Research.
Woods, S. A., Edmonds, G. W., Hampson, S. E., & Lievens, F. (2020). How our work influences who we are: Testing a theory of vocational and personality development over fifty years. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103930
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Mauro de Oliveira Magalhães
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
