Fazendo pesquisa em psicologia sistêmica na América Latina: Uma revisão integrativa com triangulação de métodos e dados

Autores

  • Victor Rafael Rezende Celestino Universidade de Brasília
  • Julia Sursis Nobre Ferro Bucher-Maluschke Universidade de Brasília

Palavras-chave:

psicologia sistêmica; triangulação; meta-modelo estrutural; revisão integrativa

Resumo

Esta revisão integrativa sintetiza dados qualitativos e quantitativos convergentes sobre a pesquisa em psicologia sistêmica na América Latina, em populações sem morbidade diagnosticada. Os critérios de eligibilidade seguiram os protocolos PRISMA e PICO. A qualidade dos estudos foi avaliada com o CASP, e o método de síntese foi a triangulação de métodos e dados. Como resultados, a partir da análise de conteúdo dos artigos por meio da nuvem de palavras, foi possível contrastar palavras-chave com categorias emergentes e desenvolver uma meta-síntese, incluindo um meta-modelo da pesquisa em psicologia sistêmica. A busca restringiu-se às bases Pepsic e Web of Science, com foco estreito no tema. Como o tema é inerentemente interdisciplinar, estudos potencialmente

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Apostolidis, T. (2006). Representations sociales et triangulation: Une application en psychologie sociale de la sante. [Social representation and triangulation: An application in health social psychology]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 22, 211-226. [ Links ]

Azevedo, F. F. d. S. (Ed.). (2010) Dicionário analógico da língua portuguesa: Ideias afins / thesaurus [Portuguese language analogic dictionary: related ideas / thesaurus] (2 ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Lexikon. [ Links ]

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [ Links ]

Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage Publications Limited. [ Links ]

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Abingdon: Routledge. [ Links ]

Boeije, H., van Wesel, F., & Slagt, M. (2014). Guidance for deciding upon use of primary mixed methods studies in research synthesis: lessons learned in childhood trauma. Quality & Quantity, 48(2), 1075-1088. doi:10.1007/s11135-012-9825-x [ Links ]

Bourdieu, P. (1967). Estrutura, habitus e prática [Structure, habitus and practice]. In Bourdieu, P. (Ed.), A economia das trocas simbólicas [The economy of symbolic exchanges] (pp. 203-229). São Paulo: Perspectiva. [ Links ]

Cadenas, H., & Arnold, M. (2015). The autopoiesis of social systems and its criticisms. Constructivist Foundations, 10(2), 169-176. [ Links ]

Capra, F., & Luigi, P. (2014). A visão sistêmica da vida. Uma concepção unificada e suas implicações filosóficas, políticas, sociais e econômicas [Life systemic view. An unified concept and its philosophical implications]. São Paulo: Cultrix. [ Links ]

Carroll, C., Booth, A., Leaviss, J., & Rick, J. (2013). "Best fit" framework synthesis: Refining the method. Bmc Medical Research Methodology, 13, 16. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-37 [ Links ]

Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Lloyd-Jones, M. (2012). Should we exclude inadequately reported studies from qualitative systematic reviews? An evaluation of sensitivity analyses in two case study reviews. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1425-1434. doi:10.1177/1049732312452937 [ Links ]

Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547. doi:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547 [ Links ]

Celestino, V. R. R., & Bucher-Maluschke, J. S. N. F. (2015). Um novo olhar para a abordagem sistêmica na psicologia. [A new look to the systemic approach in psychology]. FACEF Pesquisa - Desenvolvimento e Gestão, 18(3), 318-329. [ Links ]

Costa, L. F. (2010). A perspectiva sistêmica para a Clínica da Família. [The systemic perspective for family clinics]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa , 26, 95-104. [ Links ]

Farmer, T., Robinson, K., Elliott, S. J., & Eyles, J. (2006). Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qualitative Health Research , 16(3), 377-394. doi:10.1177/1049732305285708 [ Links ]

Ferreira, A. B. d. H. (Ed.). (1988) Dicionário Aurélio Básico da Língua Portuguesa [Portuguese language basic Aurelio dictionary]. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira. [ Links ]

Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175-197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x [ Links ]

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5 ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE. [ Links ]

Fuchs, C., & Hofkirchner, W. (2009). Autopoiesis and critical social systems theory. In Magalhaes, R. & Sanchez, R. (Eds.), Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice(pp. 111-129). [ Links ]

Gallegos, M., Berra, M., Benito, E., & López López, W. (2014). Las nuevas dinámicas del conocimiento científico y su impacto en la psicología latinoamericana. [The new scientific knowledge dynamics and its impact on psychology in Latin America]. Psicoperspectivas, 13(3), 106-117. doi:10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol13-Issue3-fulltext-377 [ Links ]

García-Martínez, A. T., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. d. (2012). World scientific production in Psychology. Universitas Psychologica, 11(3), 699-717. [ Links ]

Giddens, A. (1976). Classical social theory and origins of modern sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 703-729. doi:10.1086/226140 [ Links ]

Giddens, A. (1977). Habermas's social and political theory: toward a rational society. American Journal of Sociology , 83(1), 198-212. doi:10.1086/226517 [ Links ]

Gomes, L. B., Bolze, S. D. A., Bueno, R. K., & Crepaldi, M. A. (2014). As origens do pensamento sistêmico: Das partes para o todo. [The origins of systemic thinking: from the parts to the whole]. Pensando familias, 18(2), 3-16. [ Links ]

Günther, H. (2006). Pesquisa qualitativa versus pesquisa quantitativa: Esta é a questão? [Qualitative research versus quantitative research: this is the question?]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa , 22, 201-209. [ Links ]

Gurman, A. S., Kniskern, D. P., & Pinsof, W. M. (1986). Research on the process and outcome of marital and family therapy. Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 3, 565-624. [ Links ]

Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Mixed methods research synthesis: Definition, framework, and potential. Quality & Quantity , 47(2), 659-676. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9538-6 [ Links ]

Knafl, K. (2015). Family synthesis research: Possibilities and challenges. Journal of Family Nursing, 21(1), 3-10. doi:10.1177/1074840714568740 [ Links ]

Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(4), 557-584. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557 [ Links ]

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., . . . Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), W65-W94. [ Links ]

Luvizotto, C. K. (2013). The rationalization of traditions in modernity: The dialogue between Anthony Giddens and Jurgen Habermas. Trans-Form-Acao, 36, 245-258. [ Links ]

Maturana, H. (2015). What Is Sociology? Constructivist Foundations , 10(2), 176-179. [ Links ]

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. [ Links ]

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (2001). A árvore do conhecimento: as bases biológicas da compreensão humana. [The tree of knowledge: the biological basis of human understanding.]. São Paulo: Palas Athena. [ Links ]

Melo, V. d. A. A., & Ribeiro, M. A. (2016). Epistemologias sistêmicas e suas repercussões para a clínica da terapia familiar. [Systemic epistemologies and its repercussions for family therapy clinics]. Pensando familias, 20, 149-161. [ Links ]

Mingers, J. (2014). Systems thinking, critical realism and philosophy: A confluence of ideas. Abingdon: Routledge . [ Links ]

Pitre, N. Y., & Kushner, K. E. (2015). Theoretical triangulation as an extension of feminist intersectionality in qualitative family research. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(3), 284-298. doi:10.1111/jftr.12084 [ Links ]

Pocock, D. (2015). A philosophy of practice for systemic psychotherapy: The case for critical realism. Journal of Family Therapy, 37(2), 167-183. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12027 [ Links ]

Pote, H., Stratton, P., Cottrell, D., Shapiro, D., & Boston, P. (2003). Systemic family therapy can be manualized: Research process and findings. Journal of Family Therapy , 25(3), 236-262. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00247 [ Links ]

Rajagopalan, R., & Midgley, G. (2015). Knowing differently in systemic intervention. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(5), 546-561. doi:10.1002/sres.2352 [ Links ]

Sandberg, J. G., Johnson, L. N., Dermer, S. B., GfellerStrouts, L. L., Seibold, J. M., StringerSeibold, T. A., . . . Miller, R. B. (1997). Demonstrated efficacy of models of marriage and family therapy: An update of Gurman, Kniskern, and Pinsof's chart. AmericanJournal of Family Therapy , 25(2), 121-137. doi:10.1080/01926189708251061 [ Links ]

Sandelowski, M. (2014). Unmixing mixed-methods research. Research in Nursing & Health, 37(1), 3-8. doi:10.1002/nur.21570 [ Links ]

Sexton, T., Gordon, K. C., Gurman, A., Lebow, J., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Johnson, S. (2011). Guidelines for Classifying Evidence-Based Treatments in Couple and Family Therapy. Family process, 50(3), 377-392. [ Links ]

Singh, R. (2014). Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: reasons for optimism. Journal of Family Therapy , 36(2), 105-106. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.12039 [ Links ]

Small, M. L. (2011). How to conduct a mixed methods study: recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 57-86. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657 [ Links ]

Soares, C. B., Hoga, L. A. K., Peduzzi, M., Sangaleti, C., Yonekura, T., & Silva, D. R. A. D. (2014). Integrative review: concepts and methods used in nursing. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(2), 335-345. doi:10.1590/S0080-6234201400002000020 [ Links ]

Spink, M. J. P., Reigota, M. A. d. S., & Martins, M. H. d. M. (2014). Linguistic repertoires of interdisciplinarity in brazilian journals in the area of psychology. Repertorios lingüísticos de interdisciplinaridad en revistas brasileñas de psicología. Repertórios linguísticos de interdisciplinaridade em revistas brasileiras da área de psicologia. Paidéia, 24(59), 371-378. doi:10.1590/1982-43272459201411 [ Links ]

Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M. F. (2012). The systems approach in developmental psychology: fundamental concepts and principles fundamentais. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa , 28(4), 457-465. doi:10.1590/S0102-37722012000400011 [ Links ]

Tonkin-Crine, S., Anthierens, S., Hood, K., Yardley, L., Cals, J. W., Francis, N. A., . . . G. I. C consortium, . (2016). Discrepancies between qualitative and quantitative evaluation of randomised controlled trial results: achieving clarity through mixed methods triangulation. Implement Sci, 11, 66. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0436-0 [ Links ]

Varela, F. J., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. B. (1974). Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Curr Mod Biol, 5(4), 187-196. [ Links ]

Vasconcellos, M. J. E. (2003). Pensando o pensamento sistêmico novo paradigmático e suas implicações. [Thinking systemic thinking new paradigm and its implications]. Eisforia, 1(2). [ Links ]

Vasconcellos, M. J. E. (2004). Implicações do pensamento sistêmico novo-paradigmático: A questão da dicotomia “terapia familiar sistêmica”/“terapia familiar narrativista”. [Implications of systemic thinking new paradigm: the question of the dichotomy systemic family therapy / narrative family therapy]. Nova Perspectiva Sistêmica, 12(24), 7-13. [ Links ]

Vaughan, D. (2002). Signals and interpretive work: The role of culture in a theory of practical action. In Cerullo, K. A. (Ed.), Culture in mind: Toward a sociology of culture and cognition(pp. 28-54). New York: Routledge. [ Links ]

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1967). General theory of systems: Application to psychology. Information (International Social Science Council), 6(6), 125-136. [ Links ]

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Brazilier. [ Links ]

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 407-426. [ Links ]

Whittemore, R., Chao, A., Jang, M., Minges, K. E., & Park, C. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43(5), 453-461. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014 [ Links ]

Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics. Scientific American, 179(5), 14-18. [ Links ]

Yan, E. (2014). Finding Knowledge Paths Among Scientific Disciplines. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2331-2347. doi:10.1002/asi.23106 [ Links ]

Zoltowski, A. P. C., Costa, A. B., Teixeira, M. A. P., & Koller, S. H. (2014). Qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileiros. [Methodological quality of systematic reviews in Brazilian psychology journals]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa , 30(1), 97-104. doi:10.1590/s0102-37722014000100012 [ Links ]

Downloads

Publicado

2019-10-24

Como Citar

Rezende Celestino, V. R. ., & Sursis Nobre Ferro Bucher-Maluschke, J. . (2019). Fazendo pesquisa em psicologia sistêmica na América Latina: Uma revisão integrativa com triangulação de métodos e dados. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 34. Recuperado de https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/27914

Edição

Seção

Artigos