Instrumentos para Avaliação da Capacidade Parental e Familiar em Situações de Risco
Palavras-chave:
Psicologia; Serviço Social; Avaliação Familiar; Avaliação Multidisciplinar, Avaliação familiar, Avaliação do risco, Crianças em risco, Capacidade parental, Proteção da criançaResumo
O Modelo de Avaliação e de Intervenção Familiar Integrada (MAIFI) incorpora um processo de avaliação que visa informar a tomada de decisão em situações de risco psicossocial ou de perigo, para a criança, bem como a elaboração de projetos de apoio à família.
As Grelhas de Síntese da Avaliação Compreensiva no MAIFI (GRESAC) foram construídas para apoiar a organização e síntese desse processo de avaliação. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar as suas propriedades psicométricas no que diz respeito à validade de constructo, validade concorrente e fidelidade por avaliação da consistência interna das subescalas e acordo entre-cotadores. As GRESAC revelaram propriedades psicométricas bastante satisfatórias que permitem recomendar a sua utilização na organização e síntese de avaliações compreensivas.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
Abbad, G. S., Queiroga, F., & Zerbini, T. (2012). Fundamentos
teóricos e metodológicos em análise de instrumentos. In G. S.,
Abbad, L. Mourão, P. P. M. Meneses, T. Zerbini, J. E. Borges-
Andrade & R. Vilas-Boas (Eds.), Métodos para avaliação em
treinamento, desenvolvimento e educação: Ferramentas para
gestão de pessoas (pp. 64-76). Porto Alegre: Art med.
Azar, S. T., Lauretti, A. F., & Loding, B. V. (1998). The
evaluation of parental fitnesss in termination of parental
rights cases: A functional-contextual perspective. Clinical
Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(2),77- 100. doi:
10.1023/A:1021883611965
Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration.
American Psychologist, 35(4), 320-335. doi: 10.1037/0003-
066X.35.4.320
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting. A process model.
Child Development, 55(1), 83-96.
Budd, K. S. (2001). Assessing parenting competence in child
protection cases: A clinical practice model. Clinical
Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(1), 1-18. doi:
10.1023/A:1009548509598
Ciccheti D., & Valentino, K. (2006). An ecological-transactional
perspective on child maltreatment: Failure of the average
expectable environmental and its influence in child
development. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.),
Developmental sychopathology, Vol. 3 (2nd ed.) (pp. 129-199).
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cicchetti, D., & Lynch, M. (1995). Failures in the expectable
environment and their impact on individual development:
The case of child maltreatment. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen
(Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology. Vol. 2 Risk, disorder
and adaptation (pp. 32-71). New York : John Wiley and Sons.
Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.) (2006). Developmental
psychopathology, Vol. 3 (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1997). Transactional ecological
systems in developmental psychopathology. In S. S. Luthar, J.
A. Barack, D. Cicchetti & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental
psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk and
disorder (pp. 317-349). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens em
Risco [CNPCJR] (2009). Relatório anual de avaliação das
actividades das comissões de protecção de crianças e jovens.
Lisboa: Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens
em Risco.
Corcoran, J., & Nichols-Casebolt, A. (2004). Risk and resilience
ecological framework for assessment. Child and Adolescent
Social Work Journal, 21(3), 211-235. doi: 10.1023/B:CA
SW.0000028453.79719.65
Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Campbell, S. B. (2000).
Developmental psychopathology and family process. Theory,
research, and clinical implications. New York: The Guilford
Press.
Darlington, Y., Healy, K., & Feeney, J. A. (2010). Approaches to
assessment and intervention across four types of child and
family welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review,
32(3), 356-364. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.005
DePanfilis, D. (1996). Implementing child mistreatment risk
assessment systems: Lesson from theory. Administration in
Social Work, 20(2), 41-59. doi: 10.1300/J147v20n02_04
Department of Health (2000). Framework for the assessment of
children in need and their families. London: Stationery Office.
Farnfield, S. (2008). A theoretical model for the comprehensive
assessment of parenting. British Journal of Social Work, 38(6),
1076-1099. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl395
Fowler, J. (2003). A practitioner’s tool for child protection and the
assessment of parents. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jack, G. (2001). Ecological perspectives in assessing children and
families. In J. Horwath (Ed.), The child’s world. Assessing
children in need (pp. 53-74). London: Jessica Kingsley
Publishers.
Johnson, K. & Wagner, D. (2003). California Structured Decision
Making TM. Risk Assessment revalidation: A prospective study.
Children’s Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.nccdcrc.
org/crc/crc/pubs/CACPS2003RiskValidationReport.pdf
Johnson, M. A., Stone, S., Lou, C., Vu, C., Ling, J., Mizhari, P.,
& Austin, M. J. (2006). Family assessment in child welfare
services: Instrument comparisons. Retrieved from http://www.
childwelfare.gov/famcentered/casework/assessment.cfm
Johnson, W. L. (2011). The validity and utility of the California
Family Risk Assessment under practice conditions in the field:
A prospective study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(1), 18-28. doi:
10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.08.002
Jones, D. (2001). The assessment of parental capacity. In J. Horwath
(Ed.), The child’s world. Assessing children in need (pp. 255-
272). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer
agreement for categorical data. Biometric, 33, 159-174.
Laros, J. A. (2005). O uso da análise fatorial: Algumas diretrizes
para pesquisadores. In Pasquali. L. (Ed.), Análise fatorial
para pesquisadores (pp. 141-160). Brasília: LabPAM Saber
e Tecnologia.
Léveillé, S., & Chamberland, C. (2010). Toward a general model
for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation
of international experiences regarding the adoption of the
Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their
Families (FACNF). Children and Youth Services Review, 32,
929-944.
Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems:
Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development
and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921-930. doi: 10.1017/
S0954579407000442
Melo, A. T., & Alarcão, M. (2008). Manual de preenchimento dos
Instrumentos de Síntese da Avaliação Compreensiva no MAIFI.
Disponível com os autores.
Reder, P., & Lucey, C. (Eds.). (1995). Assessment of parenting.
Psychiatric and psychological contributions. Hove: Brunner-
Routledge.
Rose, W. (2001). Assessing children in need and their families. In
J. Horwath (Ed.), The child’s world. Assessing children in need
(pp. 35-49). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Schene, P. (2005). Comprehensive family assessment guidelines for
child welfare. National child welfare resource center for familycentered
practice. Retrieved from http://www.childwelfare.
gov/famcentered/casework/assessment.cfm
Spratt, T., & Devaney, J. (2009). Identifying families with multiple
problems: Perspectives of practitioners and managers in three
nations. British Journal of Social Work, 39(3), 418-434. doi:
10.1093/bjsw/bcm150
Torres, A. (Coord.) (2008). Estudo de diagnóstico e de avaliação das
comissões de protecção de crianças e jovens. Lisboa: Centro
de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Instituto Superior de
Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa.
Wagner, D. & Johnson, K. (1999). 13th national rountable on CPS
risk assessment. Using actuarial risk assessment to target
service interventions in pilot California counties. Madison,
Wisconsin: Children’s Research Center. Retrieved from http://
www.nccd-crc.org/crc/crc/pubs/13th_roundtable_ca_risk.pdf
Wald, M. S., & Woolverton, M. (1990). Risk assessment: The
emperor’s new clothes? Child Welfare, LXIX, 6, 483-511.
Walsh, F. (2002). A family resilience framework: Innovative
practice applications. Family Relations, 51(2), 130-137. doi:
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00130.x
Wise, S. (2003). The child in family services. Expanding child
abuse prevention. Australian Social Work, 56(3),183-195. doi:
10.1046/j.0312-407x.2003.00081.x
teóricos e metodológicos em análise de instrumentos. In G. S.,
Abbad, L. Mourão, P. P. M. Meneses, T. Zerbini, J. E. Borges-
Andrade & R. Vilas-Boas (Eds.), Métodos para avaliação em
treinamento, desenvolvimento e educação: Ferramentas para
gestão de pessoas (pp. 64-76). Porto Alegre: Art med.
Azar, S. T., Lauretti, A. F., & Loding, B. V. (1998). The
evaluation of parental fitnesss in termination of parental
rights cases: A functional-contextual perspective. Clinical
Child and Family Psychology Review, 1(2),77- 100. doi:
10.1023/A:1021883611965
Belsky, J. (1980). Child maltreatment: An ecological integration.
American Psychologist, 35(4), 320-335. doi: 10.1037/0003-
066X.35.4.320
Belsky, J. (1984). The determinants of parenting. A process model.
Child Development, 55(1), 83-96.
Budd, K. S. (2001). Assessing parenting competence in child
protection cases: A clinical practice model. Clinical
Child and Family Psychology Review, 4(1), 1-18. doi:
10.1023/A:1009548509598
Ciccheti D., & Valentino, K. (2006). An ecological-transactional
perspective on child maltreatment: Failure of the average
expectable environmental and its influence in child
development. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.),
Developmental sychopathology, Vol. 3 (2nd ed.) (pp. 129-199).
New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cicchetti, D., & Lynch, M. (1995). Failures in the expectable
environment and their impact on individual development:
The case of child maltreatment. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen
(Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology. Vol. 2 Risk, disorder
and adaptation (pp. 32-71). New York : John Wiley and Sons.
Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds.) (2006). Developmental
psychopathology, Vol. 3 (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley
& Sons.
Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. L. (1997). Transactional ecological
systems in developmental psychopathology. In S. S. Luthar, J.
A. Barack, D. Cicchetti & J. R. Weisz (Eds.), Developmental
psychopathology: Perspectives on adjustment, risk and
disorder (pp. 317-349). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens em
Risco [CNPCJR] (2009). Relatório anual de avaliação das
actividades das comissões de protecção de crianças e jovens.
Lisboa: Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Crianças e Jovens
em Risco.
Corcoran, J., & Nichols-Casebolt, A. (2004). Risk and resilience
ecological framework for assessment. Child and Adolescent
Social Work Journal, 21(3), 211-235. doi: 10.1023/B:CA
SW.0000028453.79719.65
Cummings, E. M., Davies, P. T., & Campbell, S. B. (2000).
Developmental psychopathology and family process. Theory,
research, and clinical implications. New York: The Guilford
Press.
Darlington, Y., Healy, K., & Feeney, J. A. (2010). Approaches to
assessment and intervention across four types of child and
family welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review,
32(3), 356-364. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.005
DePanfilis, D. (1996). Implementing child mistreatment risk
assessment systems: Lesson from theory. Administration in
Social Work, 20(2), 41-59. doi: 10.1300/J147v20n02_04
Department of Health (2000). Framework for the assessment of
children in need and their families. London: Stationery Office.
Farnfield, S. (2008). A theoretical model for the comprehensive
assessment of parenting. British Journal of Social Work, 38(6),
1076-1099. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcl395
Fowler, J. (2003). A practitioner’s tool for child protection and the
assessment of parents. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jack, G. (2001). Ecological perspectives in assessing children and
families. In J. Horwath (Ed.), The child’s world. Assessing
children in need (pp. 53-74). London: Jessica Kingsley
Publishers.
Johnson, K. & Wagner, D. (2003). California Structured Decision
Making TM. Risk Assessment revalidation: A prospective study.
Children’s Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.nccdcrc.
org/crc/crc/pubs/CACPS2003RiskValidationReport.pdf
Johnson, M. A., Stone, S., Lou, C., Vu, C., Ling, J., Mizhari, P.,
& Austin, M. J. (2006). Family assessment in child welfare
services: Instrument comparisons. Retrieved from http://www.
childwelfare.gov/famcentered/casework/assessment.cfm
Johnson, W. L. (2011). The validity and utility of the California
Family Risk Assessment under practice conditions in the field:
A prospective study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(1), 18-28. doi:
10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.08.002
Jones, D. (2001). The assessment of parental capacity. In J. Horwath
(Ed.), The child’s world. Assessing children in need (pp. 255-
272). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer
agreement for categorical data. Biometric, 33, 159-174.
Laros, J. A. (2005). O uso da análise fatorial: Algumas diretrizes
para pesquisadores. In Pasquali. L. (Ed.), Análise fatorial
para pesquisadores (pp. 141-160). Brasília: LabPAM Saber
e Tecnologia.
Léveillé, S., & Chamberland, C. (2010). Toward a general model
for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation
of international experiences regarding the adoption of the
Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their
Families (FACNF). Children and Youth Services Review, 32,
929-944.
Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems:
Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development
and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921-930. doi: 10.1017/
S0954579407000442
Melo, A. T., & Alarcão, M. (2008). Manual de preenchimento dos
Instrumentos de Síntese da Avaliação Compreensiva no MAIFI.
Disponível com os autores.
Reder, P., & Lucey, C. (Eds.). (1995). Assessment of parenting.
Psychiatric and psychological contributions. Hove: Brunner-
Routledge.
Rose, W. (2001). Assessing children in need and their families. In
J. Horwath (Ed.), The child’s world. Assessing children in need
(pp. 35-49). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Schene, P. (2005). Comprehensive family assessment guidelines for
child welfare. National child welfare resource center for familycentered
practice. Retrieved from http://www.childwelfare.
gov/famcentered/casework/assessment.cfm
Spratt, T., & Devaney, J. (2009). Identifying families with multiple
problems: Perspectives of practitioners and managers in three
nations. British Journal of Social Work, 39(3), 418-434. doi:
10.1093/bjsw/bcm150
Torres, A. (Coord.) (2008). Estudo de diagnóstico e de avaliação das
comissões de protecção de crianças e jovens. Lisboa: Centro
de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia, Instituto Superior de
Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa.
Wagner, D. & Johnson, K. (1999). 13th national rountable on CPS
risk assessment. Using actuarial risk assessment to target
service interventions in pilot California counties. Madison,
Wisconsin: Children’s Research Center. Retrieved from http://
www.nccd-crc.org/crc/crc/pubs/13th_roundtable_ca_risk.pdf
Wald, M. S., & Woolverton, M. (1990). Risk assessment: The
emperor’s new clothes? Child Welfare, LXIX, 6, 483-511.
Walsh, F. (2002). A family resilience framework: Innovative
practice applications. Family Relations, 51(2), 130-137. doi:
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2002.00130.x
Wise, S. (2003). The child in family services. Expanding child
abuse prevention. Australian Social Work, 56(3),183-195. doi:
10.1046/j.0312-407x.2003.00081.x
Downloads
Publicado
2015-09-03
Como Citar
Teixeira de Melo, A., & Alarcão, M. (2015). Instrumentos para Avaliação da Capacidade Parental e Familiar em Situações de Risco. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 31(1). Recuperado de https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18140
Edição
Seção
Estudos Empíricos
