Return, restitution and scientific dissemination (anthropology inside and outside home)
Keywords:
Antropologia, Etnografia, Devolução, Restituição, Divulgação científicaAbstract
This conference-essay reflects on anthropological practice through the personal and academic journey of the author, a light-skinned Black woman, exploring themes such as return, restitution, and scientific dissemination. The narrative is built in three scenes: (1) her undergraduate experience at the University of Brasília (UnB), where she confronted issues of class, race, gender, and belonging; (2) her master's studies at the Federal University of Goiás (UFG), during which she returned to her family's hometown to conduct research and developed a public visual field diary on Instagram; and (3) her doctoral work at UnB, where she created the podcast “Antropologia, como faz?” to democratize anthropological knowledge. The author discusses the importance of rethinking traditional anthropological methods by proposing more accessible and affective ways of sharing research through returns (letters, podcasts, photographs) that engage with research participants. She also distinguishes between return (a relational and affective gesture), restitution (a political-institutional act of reparation), and scientific dissemination (the public translation of knowledge). This reflection highlights anthropology as a practice in constant reinvention, one that must transcend academic boundaries and remain committed to the communities that make it possible.
Downloads
References
ANZALDÚA, Gloria. Falando em línguas: uma carta para as mulheres escritoras do terceiro mundo. Revista Estudos Feministas, Florianópolis (online), v. 8, n. 1, p. 229-236, 2000. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/9880. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2025.
ASAD, Talal. Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter. London: Ithaca Press, 1973.
FLEISCHER, Soraya. Autoria, subjetividade e poder: devolução de dados em um centro de saúde na Guariroba (Ceilândia/DF). Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 20, n. 9, p. 2649-2658, 2015.
GONZALEZ, Lélia. Por um feminismo afro-latino-americano: ensaios, intervenções e diálogos. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2020.
HARAWAY, Donna. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, v. 14, n. 3, p. 575-599, out. 1988.
HENARE, Amiria; HOLBRAAD, Martin; WASTELL, Sari (Org.). Thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically. London: Routledge, 2006.
INGOLD, Tim. Sobre levar os outros a sério; Repensando o social; Antropologia para o futuro. In: INGOLD, Tim. Antropologia: para que serve? Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2019. cap. 1; 4-5.
MANICA, Daniela Tonelli; PERES, Milena; FLEISCHER, Soraya (Org.). No Ar: Antropologia – histórias em podcast. São Paulo: Pontes Editores, 2022.
MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. Um diário no sentido estrito do termo. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 1967.
MAUSS, Marcel. Ensaio sobre a dádiva: forma e razão da troca nas sociedades arcaicas. In: _____. Sociologia e antropologia. v. II. São Paulo: Edusp, 1974 [1923-1924].
PEIRANO, Mariza. Etnografia não é método. Horizontes Antropológicos, Porto Alegre, v. 20, n. 42, p. 377–391, jul. 2014.
SAID, Edward. Orientalismo: o Oriente como invenção do Ocidente. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007.
Published
Versions
- 2025-12-22 (3)
- 2025-12-15 (2)
- 2025-12-15 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Clara Sousa Damásio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.











