Net Neutrality: Netflix vs. Comcast's Case and the Brazilian Internet Civil Mark
Palabras clave:
neutralidade de rede, Netflix, Comcast, Marco Civil da InternetResumen
Purpose ”“ The main goal of the article is to address how Brazil has progressed in favor of net neutrality. Comcast vs. Netflix case is used as an example to compare the actions took by the United States and Brazil concerning this theme.
Methodology/approach/design ”“ The text follows the problem-driven approach to infer some conclusions about the practices that has been adopted by the United States and Brazil.
Findings ”“ It has been verified that Brazil is on the vanguard of internet governance as far as net neutrality is concerned.
Practical implications ”“ The article can allow for a vast comprehension about net neutrality on par with the Brazilian Internet Civil Mark.
Descargas
Citas
_____. Marco Civil da Internet ”“ antecedentes, formulação colaborativa e resultados alcançados, 2014.
CROLEY, Steven P. Regulation and Public Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
HORWITZ, Robert Britt. The irony of regulatory reform: the deregulation of American telecommunications. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
FEINTUCK, Mike. Regulatory Rationales Beyond the Economic: In Search of the Public Interest. p. 39-63. In: BALDWIN, Robert; CAVE, Martin; LODGE, Martin (org.). The Oxford Handbook of Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Ӭ
FERREIRA, J. N. Building the Marco Civil: A Brief Review of Brazil’s Internet Regulation History. In: Stakes are High: Essays on Brazil and the Future of the Global Internet, 2014. Disponível em: http://globalnetpolicy.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/StakesAreHigh_BrazilNETmundial_final.pdf#juliananolasco: 30-34.
PAPP, Ana Carolina. Em nome da internet: os bastidores da construção coletiva do Marco Civil. Monografia de final de curso de graduação em Jornalismo. Escola de Comunicações e Artes. Universidade de São Paulo. 2014.
RAMOS. Marcelo de Matos. Neutralidade de Redes: o futuro da Internet e o mix institucional, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/central-de-documentos/documentos-de-trabalho/documentos-de-trabalho-2006/DT_41.pdf.
STIGLITZ, Joseph E. Government Failure vs. Market Failure: Principles of Regulation. In: BALLEISEN, Edward; MOSS, David (ed.). Government and Markets: Toward a New Theory of Regulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
WILSON, Ernst J. The Information Revolution and Developing Countries. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2006.
WU, Tim. Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination. Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 2, p. 141-179, 2005.
_______. A Proposal for Network Neutrality. Charlottesville: University of Virginia, 2002.
_______. Taking Innovation Seriously: Antitrust Enforcement If Innovation Mattered Most. 78(2) Antitrust Law Journal, 2012.
_______. The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires. New York: Atlantic Books, 2010.
YOO, C. and WU, T. Keeping the Internet neutral? Christopher S. Yoo and Timothy Wu debate [online]. Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper, p. 6-27, 2006. Disponível em: http://ssrn.com/abstract=953989.”¨
YOO, Christopher S. Network Neutrality and the Economics of Congestion. 94 Georgetown Law Journal, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper no. 05-28, 2006.
_______. Beyond Network Neutrality. 19 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 2005.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Al enviar este documento a la Revista de Derecho, Estado y Telecomunicaciones, declaro que estoy aceptando los términos de Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), disponible en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
