The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach

Authors

  • Alessandra Silveira University of Minho
  • Pedro Miguel Freitas University of Minho

Keywords:

conservation of data, electronic communications, fundamental rights, European Union law

Abstract

Purpose ”“ The text deals with the recent case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the directive on the retention of data (metadata) by providers of electronic communications services for the purposes of investigation, detection and prosecution of serious crimes. The authors seek to clarify the implications of the declaration of invalidity of this European directive for the EU Member States, towards the protection of legal equality of European citizens.

Methodology/approach/design ”“ The text was drafted while there was a pending ECJ’s response to the questions referred by two national courts (one Swedish and one British) on the effects of that invalidity decision on the domestic legislation that transposed it. Thus, the authors sought to anticipate the Court's decision in the light of its settled case law and the reaction of the Member States’ authorities’ after the declaration of invalidity of the referred directive.

Findings ”“ In the light of the particularities of the protection of fundamental rights in the EU and the legal model of integration, the authors draw some guidelines as to the procedure to be followed in future cases in order to safeguard the effectiveness of the Union law, namely when it comes to the legal equality of European citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alessandra Silveira, University of Minho

Coordinator of the Research Center on European Union Law at the University of Minho.

Pedro Miguel Freitas, University of Minho

Professor at the University of Minho School of Law.

References

BOEHM, F.; COLE, M. Data Retention after the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.janalbrecht.eu/fileadmin/material/Dokumente/Boehm_Cole_-_Data_Retention_Study_-_June_2014.pdf
BOEHM, F.; COLE, M. Data Retention after the Judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.janalbrecht.eu/fileadmin/material/Dokumente/Boehm_Cole_-_Data_Retention_Study_-_June_2014.pdf
GABINETE CIBERCRIME DO MINISTÉRIO PÚBLICO. Nota Prática n.o 7 sobre retenção de dados de tráfego e Lei n.o 32/2008, 2015. Disponível em: http://cibercrime.ministeriopublico.pt/sites/default/files/documentos/pdf/nota_pratica_7_retencao_de_dados.pdf
GUERRA, C.; CALVÃO, F. Anotação ao Acórdão do Tribunal de Justiça (Grande Secção) de 8 de abril de 2014, Forum de proteção de dados, Comissão Nacional de Proteção de Dados, 1, p. 79”“82, jul. 2015.
GUILD, E.; CARRERA, S. The political and judicial life of metadata: Digital Rights Ireland and the trail of the data retention directive. CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europe, 65, 2014.
PEERS, S. The data retention judgment: the CJEU prohibits mass surveillance, 2014. Disponível em: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.pt/2014/04/the-data-retention-judgment-cjeu.html
VAINIO, N.; MIETTINEN, S. Telecommunications data retention after Digital Rights Ireland”¯: legislative and judicial reactions in the Member States. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, v. 23, n. 3, p. 290”“309, set. 2015.
WHITE, M. The new Opinion on data retention: does it protect the right to privacy?, 2016. Disponível em: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.pt/2016/07/the-new-opinion-on-data-retention-does.html

Published

2017-05-15

How to Cite

SILVEIRA, Alessandra; FREITAS, Pedro Miguel. The Directive 2006/24 declaration of invalidity and the consequences of metadata retention in the EU Member States: A Fundamental Rights Standards Approach. Journal of Law and Regulation, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 281–302, 2017. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rdsr/article/view/19208. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.