Psychosurgery: integrative review from a neuroethical perspective

Authors

  • Rilva Muñoz Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • Ezemir Júnior Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • Normando Neto Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • Artur Rocha Universidade Federal da Paraíba

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rbb.v8i1-4.8195

Keywords:

Psychosurgery. Lobotomy. Bioethics. Neurosciences. Review literature as subject.

Abstract

Performing psychosurgery is still surrounded by ethical issues, especially with the recent development of neuroethics. The aim of this study was to present a review on psychosurgery, taking into consideration the bioethical aspects of its evolution over the course of history. The technique of integrative review of the literature was used. A survey was conducted through searching for scientific articles indexed in the Medline, Scielo and Lilacs databases, with the following English-language descriptors (and their equivalents in Portuguese and Spanish): psychosurgery and neuroethics; damage and psychosurgery; functional neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders; lobotomy and outcomes; patient outcomes and psychosurgery; and psychosurgery and history of medicine. Between 1942 and 1954, more than 28,000 psychosurgical procedures were performed in England and the United States, but disagreements arose regarding ethics. Thus, in the United States, the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research was created. The field of neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders has developed, and there is a need to establish precise indications for this. In Brazil, psychosurgery is dealt with by the Federal Medical Council and, recently, the Brazilian Association of Psychiatry established guidelines for performing this. Standards for ethical conduct in neurosurgical trials within psychiatry, applied worldwide, are needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rilva Muñoz, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil.

Ezemir Júnior, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil.

Normando Neto, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil.

Artur Rocha, Universidade Federal da Paraíba

João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil.

References

Fuchs T. Ethical issues in neuroscience. CurrOpinPsychiatry. 2006;19(6):600-7.

Bezerra Junior, BC. Ética antes e depois. Neurociências. 2005;2(5):277-9.

Illes J, Bird SJ. Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics neuroscience. Trends Neuroscience. 2006;29:511-517.

Lipsman N, Zener R, Besrstein M. Personal identity, enhancement and neurosurgery: a qualitative study in applied neuroethics. Bioethics. 2009;23(6):375-83.

World Health Organization. Health Aspects of Human Rights. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1976.

Masiero AL. A lobotomia e a leucotomia nos manicômios brasileiros. Hist. cienc.saude-Manguinhos. 2003;10(2):549-72.

Nahra C. Neuroscience of ethics: the state of art and the promises for the future. Ethic@. 2011;10(1):109-132.

Vilela Filho O. Tratamento cirúrgico das desordens psiquiátricas. J BrasNeurocirurg. 2009;20(3):362-364.

Mashour GA, Walker EE, Martuza RL. Psychosurgery: past, present, and future. Brain Res Rev. 2005;48:409-19.

Diering SL, Bell WO. Functional neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders: a historical perspective. StereotactFunctNeurosurg. 1991;57(4):175-94.

Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Textocontexto - enferm. 2008;17(4):758-64.

AndrushkoVA, Verano JW. Prehistoric trepanation in the Cuzco region of Peru: a view into an ancient Andean practice. Am J PhysAnthropol. 2008;137(1):4-13.

Jiménez-Ponce F, et al. Introducción a la neurocirugíapsiquiátrica. Salud Mental. 2006;29(1):3-12.14. Finger S, Clower WT. Victor Horsley on “trephining in pre-historic times”. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(4):911-17.

GostinLO. Ethical considerations of psychosurgery: The unhappy legacy of the prefrontal lobotomy. J Med Ethics. 1980;6(3):149-154.

Gross D, Schafer G. Egas Moniz (1874-1955) and the “invention” of modern psychosurgery: a historical and ethical reanalysis under special consideration of Portuguese original sources. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30(2):E8.

Cascais AF. De Egas Moniz à engenharia biomédica: Um questionamento bioético. Sociologia: Problemas e Práticas. 1991;9:57-9.

Cosgrove GR. Cirurgia para Transtornos Psiquiátricos. Psiquiatria Geral [Internet]. 2003 [Acesso em 22 mai 2011]. Disponível em: http://www.psiquiatriageral.com.br/cerebro/cirurgia.htm.

Kotowicz Z. Psychosurgery in Italy, 1936-39. HistPsychiatry. 2008;19(4):476-89.

Shorter E. Uma História da Psiquiatria: da era do manicómio à idade do Prozac. Lisboa: Climepsi; 2001.

Pedrosa-Sánchez M, Sola RG. La moderna psicocirugía: unnuevo enfoque de laneurocirugíaenlaenfermedad psiquiátrica. Rev Neurol. 2003; 36(9):887-97.

Fins JJ. From psychosurgery to neuromodulation and palliation: history’s lessons for the ethical conduct and regulation of neuropsychiatric research. NeurosurgClin Am. 2003;14(2):303-19, ix-x.

Feldman RP, Goodrich JT. Psychosurgery: a historical overview. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(3):647-57.

Shelton RC, Osuntokun O, Heinloth AN, Corya SA. Therapeutic options for treatment-resistant depression.CNS Drugs. 2010;24(2):131-61.

KrackP, Hariz MI, Baunez C, Guridi J, Obeso JA. Deep brain stimulation: from neurology to psychiatry? Trends Neurosci. 2010;33(10):474-84.

Mian MK, Campos M, Sheth SA, Eskandar EN. Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: past, present, and future. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(2):E10.

Grounds A. Reforming the mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry.2001;179:387-389.28. Clotet J. O consentimento informado nos comitês de ética em pesquisa e na prática médica: conceituação, origens e atualidade. Bioética. 1995;3(1):51-59.

Menegon VM. Consentindo ambiguidades: uma análise documental dos termos de consentimento informado, utilizados em clínicas de reprodução humana assistida. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2004;20(3):845-54.

Dupuy JP. Os desafios éticos da nanotecnologia. Revista Interfaces [Internet]. 2003 [Acesso em 24 mai 2011]. Disponível em: http://www.iiep.org.br/pdfs/doc023.pdf.

Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297(5580):353-356.

Fortes PAC. O consentimento informado na atividade médica e a resposta dos tribunais. Rev Justiça Democracia. 1996;1(2):185-97.

Muñoz DR, Fortes PAC. O Princípio da autonomia e o consentimento livre e esclarecido. In: Costa GO, Garrafa V. (org). Iniciação à Bioética. Brasília: Conselho. Federal de Medicina, 1998.

Soares JCRS, Camargo Jr KR. A autonomia do paciente no processo terapêutico como valor para a saúde. Interface (Botucatu) 2007;11(21):65-78.

Abdalla-Filho E. Ética e psiquiatria. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2007;29(4):387.

Bombarda JM, Alves LCA, Bacheschi LA. Psicocirurgia: a busca de um equilíbrio. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2004; 26(1):6-7.

Bertolote JM. Legislação relativa à saúde mental: revisão de algumas experiências internacionais. Rev. Saúde Pública. 1995;29(2):152-6.

Miguel EC, Lopes AC, Guertzenstein EZ, et al. Diretrizes para a neurocirurgia dos transtornos psiquiátricos graves no Brasil: uma proposta preliminar. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2004;26(1):8-9.

Sachdev PS, Chen X. Neurosurgical treatment of mood disorders: traditional psychosurgery and the advent of deep brain stimulation. CurrOpin Psychiatry. 2009;22(1):25-31.

How to Cite

Muñoz, R., Júnior, E., Neto, N., & Rocha, A. (2012). Psychosurgery: integrative review from a neuroethical perspective. Revista Brasileira De Bioética, 8(1-4), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.26512/rbb.v8i1-4.8195

Issue

Section

Artigos de Atualização