THE POSITION OF QUINE ON KANTIAN ANALYSIS AND THE SEARLE SOLUTION FOR THE OBSCURITY OF THE USE OF THE TERM "ANALYTICAL"

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/pl.v4i8.11699

Keywords:

Analycity. Logic Positivism. Semantic.

Abstract

The present article intend expose succintly the notion of analycity that proposed by German philosopher Imannuel Kant, for then to introduce of basic form the criticism of Quine the empiricism reading about the notion of analycity. And then , from these exhibts of analycity in Kant and Quine, I will develop the argument of John Searle in favor of utilitary use of “analytical” term in Philosophy.Although that concept be defective, in according Searle, contrary to what can be affirm, we could to do a great use it, since we used your canons adequaly.Thus,will developed the arguments of Searle presents in his work Speech Acts in favor of a new utilitary use of “analytical” term for Philosophy. Thereat ,we will be get to expose a favorable position about Kantian's analycity predicted before like obscure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Michelle Cardoso Montoya, Universidade Federal Fluminense

Graduanda em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal Fluminense.

References

BENNETT, Jonathan. Kants Analytic. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

CARNAP, Rudolph; Schlick, Moritz.Coletânea de textos.São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1988.

GIBSON, ROGER F. (organizador). The Cambridge Companion to Quine. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

GRICE, Herbert Paul ; Strawson, Peter Frederick. In Defense of a Dogma. The Philosophical Review, Durhem, volume. 65, número 2, 1956 .pp. 141-158.

KANT, Immanuel .Crítica da Razão Pura .São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1991.

________. Crítica da Razão Pura .Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 2012.

________. Crítica da Razão Pura. 7ª e d i ç ã o . L i s b o a : F u n d a ç ã o C a l o u s t e Gulbenkian, 2010.

________. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. 2ª edição. London: Macmillan, 1929.

________. Lógica. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1992.

________. Manual dos cursos de lógica geral.Campinas: IFCH-UNICAMP, 1998.

PROOPS, Ian . Kant's Conception of analytic judgment. P h i l o s o p h ya n d Phenomenological Research, United Kingdom, volume 70, 3ªedição,2005.pp. 588-612.

QUINE, Willard Van Orman .The roots of reference. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co., 1974.

________. (1960).Word and Object . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2015.

________. From a Logical Point of View.2ª edição.Cambridge/Harvard Press, 2003.

________. (1951). “Dois dogmas do empirismo”In: Relatividade ontológica e outros ensaios (col. Os Pensadores) 2ª edição. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1980.

________. Pursuit of truth. Cambridge, Massaschusetts: Harvard University Press, 1990.

SEARLE, John R .Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. L o n d o n : Cambridge University Press, 1977.

________. (1977).Os actos de fala ”“ U m e n s a i o d e F i l o s o f i a d a Linguagem. Coimbra: Livraria Almedina, 1984.

STRAWSON, Peter Frederick. An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason . London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1966.

Published

2016-12-06

How to Cite

Cardoso Montoya, M. . (2016). THE POSITION OF QUINE ON KANTIAN ANALYSIS AND THE SEARLE SOLUTION FOR THE OBSCURITY OF THE USE OF THE TERM "ANALYTICAL". PÓLEMOS – Revista De Estudantes De Filosofia Da Universidade De Brasília, 4(8), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.26512/pl.v4i8.11699

Issue

Section

Artigos