Fonologia Ecossistêmica
Keywords:
linguistic endoecology, ecosystemic linguistics, dynamic systems theory, articulatory gesture.Abstract
Studies on language sounds have traditionally approached human speech and its patterning from two distinct views: that of a biomechanical and physical activity, with the articulators moving continually through time provoking acoustic results that are perceived by the human ear (phonetics); and that of a mental and cognitive activity, in which a sequence of sounds limited by the language inventory is chosen to produce meaning (phonology). However, with the premise that language is an ecosystem whose behavior emerges from the interaction of its various elements in a holistic fashion, it is impossible to dissociate these two apparently distinct fields, since they both compose a single system. This paper explores the theoretical assumptions of Ecosystemic Linguistics and of Dynamic Systems Theory to argue in favor of an Ecosystemic Phonology in which traditional phonetics and phonology are viewed as two descriptive dimensions, microscopic and macroscopic, of a single system. In order to do so, this paper aims to demonstrate that the Articulatory Gesture plays the role of smallest phonological unit more effectively than the phoneme, for it incorporates both dimensions in a single unit as it bears a dynamic, emergent, holistic, non-linear and implementational nature.
Downloads
References
ALBANO, E. C. O gesto e suas bordas: esboço de fonologia acústico-articulatória do português brasileiro. Campinas: Mercado das Letras, 2001.
BARBOSA, P. A. Incursões em torno do ritmo da fala. Pontes, 2006.
BECKNER, C.; BLYTHE, R.; BYBEE, J.; et al. Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, v. 59, n. s1, p. 1”“26, 2009. Wiley Online Library.
BEST, C. T. The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words, v. 167, p. 167”“224, 1994.
BOT, K. DE; LOWIE, W.; VERSPOOR, M. A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism language and cognition, v. 10, n. 1, p. 7, 2007.
BROWMAN, C. P.; GOLDSTEIN, L. Gestural structures and phonological patterns. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, p. 1”“23, 1989.
_______. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, p. 341”“376, 1990.
_______. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, v. 49, n. 3-4, p. 155”“180, 1992.
_______. Dynamics and articulatory phonology. Mind as motion, p. 175”“193, 1995.
_______ M. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology, v. 3, n. 01, p. 219”“252, 1986. Cambridge Univ Press.
BYBEE, J. Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, v. 24, n. 02, p. 215”“221, 2002. Cambridge Univ Press.
BYBEE, J. Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
CHOMSKY, N.; HALLE, M. The sound pattern of English. , 1968.
COUTO, H. H. Linguística Ecossistêmica. Ecolinguística: Revista brasileira de ecologia e linguagem, v. 1, n. 1, p. 39”“62, 2015.
_______, H. H. DO. Ecolinguística: estudo das relações entre língua e meio ambiente. Thesaurus Editora, 2007.
CRISTÓFARO SILVA, T. Descartando fonemas: a representação mental da fonologia de uso. In: D. Hora; G. Collischonn (Eds.); Teoria linguística: fonologia e outros temas, 2003. João Pessoa: Editora Universitária.
_______. Fonologia probabilística: estudos de caso do português brasileiro. Lingua (gem), v. 2, n. 2, p. 223”“248, 2005.
_______. Fonética e fonologia: perspectivas complementares. Estudos das Língua (gem), v. 3, p. 25”“40, 2006a.
_______. Modelos multirrepresentacionais em fonologia. Os fatos da linguagem, esse conjunto nheteróclito. Araraquara: Laboratório Editorial da FCL, p. 171”“185, 2006b.
_______.; GOMES, C. A. Aquisição fonológica na perspectiva multirepresentacional. Letras de Hoje [peri{ó}dico na internet], v. 42, n. 1, p. 179”“191, 2007.
_______.; LEITE, C. Padrões sonoros emergentes: (oclusiva alveolar+ sibilante) no português brasileiro. Caderno de Letras, , n. 24, p. 15”“36, 2015.
FLEGE, J. E. Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In: W. Strange (Ed.); Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. p.233”“277, 1995. Baltimore: York Press.
FLEGE, J. E. Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. Laboratory phonology, v. 9, p. 353”“382, 2007.
GARNER, M. Language ecology as linguistic theory. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, v. 17, n. 33, p. 91”“101, 2005.
GOLDSMITH, J. A. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Blackwell Oxford, 1990.
JANNEDY, S.; HAY, J.; BOD, R. Probabilistic linguistics. MIT Press, 2003.
JOHNSON, K. Acoustics and auditory phonetics. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1997.
KEATING, P. A. The phonology-phonetics interface. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, p. 45”“60, 1996.
KELSO, J. A. S.; SALTZMAN, E. L.; TULLER, B. The dynamical perspective on speech production: Data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 29”“59, 1986. DTIC Document.
KRAMSCH, C.; STEFFENSEN, S. V. Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. Encyclopedia of language and education. p.2595”“2606, 2008. Mew York: Springer US.
KUHL, P. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & psychophysics, v. 50, n. 2, p. 93”“107, 1991.
KUHL, P. K.; CONBOY, B. T.; COFFEY-CORINA, S.; et al. Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: new data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, v. 363, n. 1493, p. 979”“1000, 2008.
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, v. 18, n. 2, p. 141”“165, 1997.
LEATHER, J. Phonological issues in language learning. Blackwell, 1999.
PENNINGTON, M. C. Phonology in context. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
PIERREHUMBERT, J. Phonological and phonetic representation. Journal of phonetics, v. 18, n. 3, p. 375”“394, 1990.
_______. Stochastic phonology. Glot International, v. 5, n. 6, p. 195”“207, 2001a. Citeseer.
_______. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 137-57. , 2001b. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
_______. Word-specific phonetics. Mouton de Gruyter Berlin, 2002.
_______. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and speech, v. 46, n. 2-3, p. 115”“154, 2003. SAGE Publications.
SILVA, A. H. P. Pela incorporação de informação fonética aos modelos fonológicos. Revista Letras, v. 60, p. 319”“333, 2003.
STEVENS, K. N. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In: E. E. DAVID JR; P. B. DENES (Eds.); Human Communication: a unified view. p.51”“66, 1972. New York: McGraw-Hill.
VIEIRA, M. J. B.; CRISTÓFARO-SILVA, T. Redução Vocálica en postônica final. Revista da ABRALIN, v. 14, n. 1, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License allowing the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in institutional repositories or as book chapters), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can bring about productive revisions as well as increase impact.
Citation of published works (See The Effect of Free Access).