Sequencialidadade: por uma ecologia do texto

Authors

  • Jacob L. Mey University of Southern Denmark

Keywords:

Text; dynamicity; spatiotemporality; sequentiality; ecology.

Abstract

An ecological view of text production and consumption involves placing the text in a total world context. Context should not be seen as a static collocation of features or parameters; rather, it is a constantly evolving conglomerate of ever-changing conditions, both human and worldly. In particular, a context is never fixed in time; and the way we act in a context involves a constant adjustment of our activities, both verbal and nonverbal. This point of view has consequences for our understanding of both world and text: what I call ‘sequentiality’ is therefore a main constituent of our ecological text activities and a necessary precondition for our understanding and handling of a text, either written or spoken. Moreover, this way of conceptualizing and realizing context has not only theoretical importance: I will also try to show that applying this line of thought to ordinary human conversational interaction may have fruitful effects, and in particular enables us to do away with a mechanistic interpretation and analysis of conversation as it is currently practiced in CA and related enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jacob L. Mey, University of Southern Denmark

Professor de linguística , especializado em pragmática . Atualmente, é professor emérito do Instituto de Linguagem e Comunicação da Universidade do Sul da Dinamarca , do qual se aposentou em 1996.

References

ARUNDALE, R. B. ‘Pragmatics, conversational implicature, and conversation’. In: Fitch, K. & Sanders, R. (eds.) Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 2005, p. 41-63.

_______; GOOD, G. ‘Boundaries and sequences in studying conversation’. In: FETZER, A.; MEIERKORD, C. (orgs). Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets Conversation Analysis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2002, p. 121-150.

BAUMAN, R.; SHERZER, J. (orgs.). Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.

GU, Yueguo. The activity type as interface between language and parole, and between individual and society: An argument for trichotomy in pragmatics. Pragmaticsand Society v. 1 n. 1, 2010, p. 74-101.

GUMPERZ, J.; LEVINSON, S. C. (orgs.). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1996.

HAUGH, M.. The constitution of politeness implicature in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 2007, p. 84-110.

KECSKES, I. A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 2000, p. 605-625.

LEVINSON, S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

_______. Interactional biases in human thinking. In: GOODY, Esther (org.). Social intelligence in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 221-260.

_______. 2000. Presumptive meanings. Cambridge: MIT Press.

MAYLE, P. Chasing Cézanne. New York: Vintage Books,1997.

MEY, J. L. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford & Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 2001 [1993].

SEARLE, J. R. 1975. Indirect Speech Acts. In: COLE, Peter; MORGAN, Jerry (orgs.). Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press, 1975, p. 59-82.

Published

2016-09-11

How to Cite

Mey, J. L. (2016). Sequencialidadade: por uma ecologia do texto. Ecolinguística: Revista Brasileira De Ecologia E Linguagem (ECO-REBEL), 2(2), 06–18. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9686

Issue

Section

Articles