Phi-features and neuter pronouns: the case of isso in Brazilian Portuguese

Autores

  • Renato Miguel Basso UFSCar

Palavras-chave:

phi-features, demonstratives, agreement, semantics, indexicals

Resumo

In this squib we propose a semantic analysis of anaphoric isso in Brazilian Portuguese in contrast with its deictic use, since isso has a different range of possible antecedents/referents for each use. Our analysis claims that isso lacks phi-feature and can have as antecedent only linguistic structures which also lack phi-features. We claim that this analysis also explains the fact that isso does not appear in descriptions, cannot be interpretated as a bound variable, and shows a “fact reading” in some contexts. Since most abstract entities reference are achieve via non-DP and non-NP structure, isso is a natural choice of anaphor in these cases, but as we show its uses are restricted by linguistic constraints.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BASSO, R. M. A semântica das relações anafóricas entre eventos. Tese (Doutorado) – UNICAMP, 2009.

HARBOUR, D. et al. (ed.). Phi features: Phi-features across Modules and Interfaces. Oxford: OUP, 2008.

HEIM, I. Features on Bound Pronouns. In: HARBOUR, D. et al. (ed.). Phi features: Phi-features across Modules and Interfaces. Oxford: OUP, 2008. p. 35-56.

NUNBERG, G. The non-uniqueness of semantic solutions: Polysemy. Linguistics and Philosophy, v. 3, p. 143-184, 1979.

NUNBERG, G. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, v. 12, p. 109-132, 1995.

NUNBERG, G. The pragmatics of deferred interpretation. In: HORN, L.; WARD, G. (ed.). Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford, England: Blackwell, 2004. p. 344-364.

REZAC, M. Phi-features and the Modular Architecture of Language. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.

SAUERLAND, U. On the Semantic Markedness of Phi-Features. In: HARBOUR, D. et al. (ed.). Phi features: Phi-features across Modules and Interfaces. Oxford: OUP, 2008. p. 57-82.

SUDO, Y. On the semantics of phi-features on pronouns. Ph.D., MIT, 2012.

WEBBER, B. L. Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis. Natural Language and Cognitive Processes, v. 6, p. 107-135, 1991.

Downloads

Publicado

02.11.2021