“Mother-researcher”: articulations and practicalities in a research on care

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.10619

Keywords:

care, mother-researcher, feminist studies, tentacular thinking

Abstract

This article proposes to reflect on practices of doing research on care, from the place of a “mother-researcher”, based on an ethnographic experience in a rural Commune located in a settlement in the rural area of Rio Grande do Sul (BR). Inspired by María Puig de la Bellacasa, we consider that ethics of doing research does not live in a “subjective” and difficult-to-access place, but it’s located in daily care practices, crossed by the possibilities of being “touched”, both in the material as well as affective sense. From scenes experienced in the fieldwork, in which being a researcher and a mother provoke a privileged situation, the concepts of “kin” and “touching visions” are rescued in order to perceive the boundaries between “me” and “other” as blurred, enabling relationships, creating reciprocal connections and articulations between being, whether human or not

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniela Dalbosco Dell’Aglio, Faculdade do Desenvolvimento do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutora em Psicologia Social e Institucional pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul – UFRGS (2021) e docente do curso de Psicologia da Faculdade do Desenvolvimento do Rio Grande do Sul – FADERGS, em Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.

References

Carneiro, Rosamaria Giatti. 2020. “Como fica a prática de pesquisa, escrita e ensino das antropólogas depois da maternidade?” Anais da 32RBA: Reunião Brasileira de Antropologia, Rio de Janeiro.

Cassel, Joan. 1987. Children in the field: Anthropological experiences. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Cupples, Julie, e Sara Kindon. 2003. “Far from being ‘Home Alone’: The dynamics of accompanied fieldwork”. Journal of Tropical Geography 24, nº 2: 211–28.

DOI : 10.1111/1467-9493.00153

Haraway, Donna. 2009. “Manifesto ciborgue: Ciência, tecnologia e feminismo-socialista no final do século XX”. In Antropologia do ciborgue: As vertigens do pós-humano, editado por Hari Kunzru, Donna Haraway, e Thomaz Tadeu, 33–118. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham; London: Duke University Press.

Korpela, Mari, Laura Hirvi, e Sanna Tawah. 2016. “Not alone: Doing fieldwork in the company of family members”. Suomen Antropologi 41, nº 3: 3–20.

Latimer, Joanna, e Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2013. “Re-thinking the ethical: Everyday shifts of care in biogerontology”. In Ethics, Law and Society, editado por N. Priaulx, e A. Wrigley, 153–74. Farnham: Ashgate.

Machado, Letícia, Marcelo Perlin, Rossana Soletti, Livia Kmetzch Rosa e Silva, Ida Vanessa Schwartz, Adriana Seixas, Felipe Ricachenevsky, Alessandra Tamajusuku, e Fernanda Stanisçuaski. 2019. “Parent in Science: The impact of parenthood on the scientific career in Brazil”. IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Gender Equality in Software Engineering (GE), 37–40. Montreal, QC, Canada.

Metzger, Jonathan. 2014. “Spatial planning and/as caring for more-than-human place”. Environment and Planning A 46, nº 5: 1001–11.

DOI : 10.1068/a140086c

Mol, Annemarie. 2008. The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Puig de la Bellacasa, María. 2017. Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Verani, Alana Pacheco dos Reis. 2022. “Tornando-se mães e antropólogas: Uma etnografia sobre experiências que desafiam ideais de maternidade e ciência”. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Published

2023-04-28

How to Cite

Dell’Aglio, Daniela Dalbosco. 2023. “‘Mother-researcher’: Articulations and Practicalities in a Research on Care”. Anuário Antropológico 48 (1):189-204. https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.10619.