Property limits
debates on the body, nature na culture in Melanesia
Palavras-chave:
AntropologiaResumo
A aplicação do conceito anglo-americano de propriedade está se expandindo exponencialmente. Novas formas de propriedade têm sido propostas pelas ciências da vida para a informação genética, por governos e Organizações Não Governamentais (ONGs) para o direito de poluir, e por organizações multilaterais para a cultura. Entretanto, essas demandas novas por propriedade precipitaram debates sobre os limites apropriados para regimes de propriedade. Uma conseqüência não intencional desses debates, contudo, tem sido a promoção dos conceitos anglo-americanos de corpo, natureza e cultura. São acionados exemplos da Melanésia, onde a língua das transações desafia as pressuposições que dão suporte aos modelos euroamericanos de propriedade. O artigo examina debates sobre uma patente para uma linha de célula humana, o gerenciamento da poluição de uma mina de cobre e ouro, e se a cultura pode ser apropriada.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
ALPERS, M. P. 1996. Perspectives from Papua New Guinea. In: FRIEDLAENDER, Robert. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property: furor erupts over genetic research on indigenous groups. Cultural. Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 32.
ALTMAN, D. 2002. Just how far can trading o f emissions be extended? The New York Times, 31 May 2002, Business Day. C l. 13.
ANDERSON, W. 2000. The possession o f kuru: medical science and biocolonial exchange. Comparative Studies o f Society and History, n .42: 713-744.
AOKI, K. 1998. Biocolonialism, anticommons property, and biopiracy in the (Not- So-Brave). New World Order o f International Intellectual Property Protection, Indiana Journal o f Global Legal Studies, n. 6:11-58. In: APPADURAI, A. (Ed.). 1986. The social life o f things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BANKS, G.; BALLARD, B. (Eds.). 1997. The ok tedi settlement: Issues, outcomes and implications. National Centre for Development Studies, Pacific Policy Paper 27, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Canberra: The Australian National University, and Resource
Management in Asia-Pacific, Research school o f pacific and asian studies, Canberra: The Australian National University.
BARRON, A. 1998. No other law? Authority, property and aboriginal art. In: BENTLEY L.;
MARIATIS, S. (Eds.). Intellectual property and ethics. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
BECK, U. 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
BELEJACK, B. 2001. The professor and the plants: prospecting for problems in Chiapas. Texas observer (Austin), 22 June 2001, p. 8-13, n. 29. Available at: <www.texasobserver.org>.
BHATS, A. 1996. The National Institutes of Health and the Papua New Guinea Cell Line. In: FRIEDLAENDER, R. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 29-31.
BIAGIOLI, M. 1998. The instability o f authorship: credit and responsibility in contemporaryn Biomedicine, FASEB, n. 12: 3-16.
BOYD, D. J. 1996. A tale o f “First Contact” : the Hagahai o f Papua New Guinea. Research in Melanesia, n. 20: 103-140.
BROWN, M. 1998. Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology, n. 39(2): 193-222.
______ . 2003. Who owns native culture? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BROWNE, N.; COOKE, T. et al. 1983. Ok tedi 24:00. Brisbane: Thomas Cooke and associates for ok tedi mining limited.
BRUSH, S. B. 1996. Indigenous knowledge o f biological resources and intellectual property rights: the role of anthropology. American Anthropologist, n. 95(2): 653-686.
_________. 1 9 9 9 . Bioprospecting the public domain. Cultural Anthropology, n. 14(4): 535-555.
BUSSE, M.; WHIMP, K. 2000. Introduction. In: WHIMP, K.; BUSSE, M. (Eds.). Protection o f intellectual, biological and cultural property in Papua New Guinea. Canberra and Port Moresby: Asia Pacific Press and Conservation Melanesia Inc.
BYRNE, J. 1995. Rex Dagi et al. The broken hill proprietary company limited, n. 5782 of 1994 and others. Victorian Supreme Court of Melbourne, 10 November, 1995.
CHAPMAN, P.; BURCHETT, M.; CAMPBELL, P.; DIETRICH, W.; HART, B. 2000. Ok Tedi Mining, Ltd. (OTML). Environment Peer Review Group (PRG): Comments on key issues and review comments on the final human and ecological risk assessment documents. April 2000. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
CROOK, T. 2004. Transactions in perpetual motion. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus of melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn.
CUNNINGHAM, H. 1998. Colonial encounters in postcolonial contexts: patenting indigenous DNA and the human genome diversity project. Critique o f Anthropology, n. 18(2): 205-233.
DIVECHA, S. 2001. Private Power. Originally published on ZNET (www.zmag.org). Available at: <www.mpi.org.au/oktedi/private_power.html>.
DOMINGUEZ, V. 1992. Invoking culture: the messy side of cultural politics. South Atlantic Quarterly, n. 91(1): 19-42.
______ . 2001. Reply to Stuart Kirsch, Lost worlds: environmental disaster, culture loss, and the Law. Current Anthropology, n. 42(2): 182-183.
DOVE, M. R. 1994. Marketing the rain forest: Green Panacea or Red Herring? Asia Pacific Issues, n. 13: 1-8. Honolulu: East-West Center.
_______Ӣ 1996. Center, periphery, and Biodiversity: a paradox o f governance and a developmental challenge. In: BRUSH, S. B.; STAB INSKY, D. (Eds.). Valuing local knowledge: indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Washington, DC: Island Press.
ENVIRONMENTAL Defense. 2002. Farmers and Electric Company Strike a Unique Deal to Slow Global Warming. Available at:
<www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?contentid=1669>.
ESCOBAR, A. 2001. Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, n. 20(2): 139-174.
EVANS, G.2002. Dealing with the Hardest Issues. Mining Monitor, n. 7(1): 11.
FEENY, D.; BIRKES, F.; McCAY, B. J.; ACHESON, J. M. 1990. The tragedy o f the commons: twenty-two years later. Human ecology, n. 18(1): 1-19. In: FILER, C. 1997. Compensation,
rent and power in Papua New Guinea. In: TOFT, S. (Ed.). Compensation fo r resource development in papua New Guinea. Port Moresby and Canberra: Law Reform Commission o f Papua New Guinea, Monograph n. 6, and National Centre for Development Studies,
Pacific Policy Paper 24.
FILER, C. 1997. Compensation, rent and power in Papua New Guinea. In: TOFT, S. (Ed.). Compensation fo r resource development in Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby and Canberra: Law Reform Commission of Papua New Guinea, Monograph n. 6, and National Centre for Development Studies, Pacific Policy Paper 24.
FISHLOCK, T. 1993. Brawling over Souls in God’s Last Battlefield: Lost-Tribe Missionaries
Damned as Unchristian. The Sunday Telegraph, 22 August, p. 20. NEXIS Library, News.
FRIEDLAENDER, J. 1996. Introduction. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, Peoples, and Property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 22-25.
GOLDMAN, M. (Ed.). 1998. Privatising nature: political struggles for the global commons. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
GORDON, J. 1997. The ok tedi lawsuit in retrospect. In: BANKS, G.; BALLARD, C. (Eds.). The ok tedi settlement: issues, outcomes and implications. Canberra: National Centre for Development Studies and Resource Management in the Asia-Pacific.
GREELY, H. T. 1998. Legal, ethical, and social issues in human genome research. Annual Review o f Anthropology, n. 27: 473-502.
HARDIN, G. 1968. The tragedy o f the commons. Science, n. 162(3859): 1243-1248.
HARRISON, S. 1993. The commerce o f cultures in Melanesia. Man (n.s.), n. 28: 139-158.
______ . 2000. From Prestige goods to legacies: property and the objectification o f culture in melanesia. Comparative studies in society and history, n. 42: 662-679.
HAYDEN, C. 1998. A biodiversity sampler for the millennium. In: FRANKLIN, S.; RAGONÉ, H. (Eds.). Reproducing reproduction: kinship, power, and technological innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
HIGGINS, R. J. 2002. Ok tedi: creating community partnerships for sustainable development. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
HIRSCH, E. 2004. Boundaries o f Creation: the work o f credibility in science and ceremony. In:
HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). Trmisactiom and creations: property and the stimulus of melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). 2004. Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus o f melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn. Ibeji, Y. and K. Gane 1996. The Hagahai Patent Controversy. Their Own Words. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 33.
JACKSON, J. E. 1995. Culture, genuine and spurious: the politics o f indianness in the Vaupés, Colombia. American Ethnologist, n. 22(1): 3-27.
JENKINS, C. L. 1987. Medical anthropology in the western schrader range, Papua New Guinea. National Geographic Research, n. 3: 412-30.
KALINOE, L. 2004. Legal options for the regulation of intellectual and cultural property in Papua New Guinea. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus o f melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn. Kalinoe, L. and J. Simet. 1999. “Cultural Policy to Oversee Management of Cultures, Cultural Material” , The Independent, 23 September 1999, p. 13. Keesing, R. 1989. Creating the Past: Custom and identity in the contemporary pacific. The contemporary pacific, n. 1-2: 19-42.
KIMBRELL, A. 1996. Biocolonization: the patenting of life and the global market in Body Parts. In: MANDER, J.; GOLDSMITH, E. (Eds.). The case against the global economy and fo r a turn toward the local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.
KIRSCH, S. 1997. Lost tribes: indigenous people and the social imaginary. Anthropological Quarterly, n. 70(2): 58-67.
______ . 2001a. Property effects: social networks and compensation claims in Melanesia. Social Anthropology, n. 9(2): 147-163.
______ . 2001b. Lost worlds: environmental disaster, “Culture Loss” and the Law. Current Anthropology, n. 42(2): 67-98.
______ . 2002. Anthropology and advocacy: a case study o f the campaign against the ok tedi mine. Critique o f Anthropology, n. 22(2): 175-200.
KOPYTOFF, I. 1996. The cultural biography o f things: commoditization as process. In:
APPADURAI, A. (Ed.). The social life o f things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: University o f Cambridge.
LILOQULA, R. 1996. Value o f life: saving genes versus saving indigenous peoples. In:
FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 42-45.
LOCK, M. 1994. Interrogating the Human Diversity Genome Project. Social Science and Medicine, n. 39(5): 603-606. In: LOCKE, J. 1960[1698]. Two treatises o f government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MACPHERSON, C. B. 1962. The political theory o f possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MANGI, J. 1988. On the question o f the “Lost Tribes” : a report on a field trip o f 24-20 April
1985. University o f Papua New Guinea Schrader Mountains Report n. 4. Research in Melanesia, n. 9: 37-65.
MARKS, J. 1995. The human genome diversity project AAA Newsletter n. 36(4): 72. In:
MAURER, B. 1999. Forget Locke? From Proprietor to Risk-Bearer in New Logics o f Finance. Public Culture, n. 11(2): 365-385.
VAN MEIJL, T.; VON BEND A-B ECKMANN, F.L. (Eds.). 1999. Property rights and economic development. Land and natural resources in southeast Asia and Oceania. London: Kegan Paul International.
MILTON, K. 1996. Environmentalism and cultural theory: exploring the role of anthropological in environmental discourse. New York: Routledge.
MUEHLEBACH, A. 2001. Making place at the United Nations: indigenous cultural politics at the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations. Cultural Anthropology, n. 16(3): 415-448.
NELSON, R. D.; MAZZOLEN1, R. 1997. Economic theories about the costs and benefits of patents. Intellectual property rights and the dissemination o f research tools in molecular biology: summary o f a workshop help at the national academy. National Academy Press. Available at <www.nap.edu/openbook/0309057485/html/17.html>.
OK TEDI, Mining. 2003. Corporate website. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
PÁLSSON, G.; HARDARDÓTTIR, K. E. 2002. For Whom the Cell Tolls: Debates about Biomedicine. Current Anthropology, n. 43(2): 271-301.
PARAMETR1X, Inc.; URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. 1999. Draft Executive Summary: assessment o f human health and ecological risks for proposed mine waste mitigation options at the ok tedi mine, Papua New Guinea. Detailed Level Risk Assessment. Prepared for Ok Tedi Mining, Ltd., p. 1-15,6 August. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
PERKS, R.; G. WETSTONE, G. 2003. Rewriting the Rules, Year-End Report, 2002: The Bush Administration’s Assault on the Environment Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.
PIETZ, W. 1999. The fetish o f civilization: sacrificial blood and monetary debt. In: PELS,
P.; SALEMINK, O. (Eds.). Colonial subjects: essays on the practical history o f anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI: University o f Michigan Press.
POVINELLI, E.A. 2001. Radical worlds: the anthropology o f incommensurability and inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology, n. 30: 319-334.
______ . 2002. The cunning o f recognition: indigenous alterities and the making of australian multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
PURI, K. 2001. Draft model law for the pacific. Draft published as model law fo r the protection o f traditional knowledge and expressions o f culture. Working and information Papers, 2nd Working group for Legal Experts on the Protection o f Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Culture, Noumea, New Caledonia, 2003.
RABINOW, P. 1996. Severing the ties: fragmentation and dignity in Late Modernity. In:
RABINOW, P. (Ed.). Essays on the Anthropology o f Reason. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
______ . 2002. Midst anthropology’s problems. The 2001 David M. Schneider Distinguished Lecture. Cultural Anthropology, n. 17(2): 135-149.
RAMOS, A. R. 2000. The commodification of the Indian. Série Antropologia. Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de Brasília, n. 281: 1-17.
RIORDAN, T. 1995. A recent patent on a Papua New Guinea Tribe’s cell line prompts outrage and charges of “Biopiracy”. The New York Times, 27 November: D2.
ROSE, C. M. 1994. Property and persuasion: essays on the history, theory, and rhetoric of ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
______ . 2000. Expanding the choices for the global commons: comparing newfangled tradable emission allowance schemes to old-fashioned common property regimes. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Review, n. 10: 45-72.
ROSEN, L. 1997. The right to be different: indigenous peoples and the quest for a unified theory. The Yale Law Journal, n. 107(1): 227-259.
SAHLINS, M. 1999. What is anthropological enlightenment? Some lessons of the twentieth century. Annual Review o f Anthropology, n. 28: I-XXIII.
SANTOS, R. V. 2002. Indigenous peoples, postcolonial contexts and genomic research in the late 20th century: a view from Amazonia 1960-2000. Critique o f Anthropology, n. 22(1): 81-104.
SCOTT, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
SENGI, D. 1996. The Challenge o f the Hagahai Blood Saga. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 40. Excerpted from Viewpoint. Uni Tavur (student newspaper o f University o f Papua New Guinea), 4 August, 1995.
SHIVA, V.; HOLLA-BHAR, R. 1996. Piracy by patent: the case o f the neem tree. In:
GOLDSMITH, E.; MANDER, J. (Eds.). The case against the global economy and fo r a turn towards Localization. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.
SILLITOE, P. 1998. The development of indigenous knowledge. Current Anthropology, n. 39(2): 223-252.
SOTO, H. de. 2000. The mystery o f capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.
STRATHERN, M. 1996. Cutting the Network. Journal o f the Royal Anthropological Institute, n, 2: 517-535.
______ . 1999. Property, substance and effect. Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press.
______ . 2001. Global and Local Contexts. In: KALINOE, L.; LEACH, J. (Eds.). Rationales o f ownership: ethnographic studies of transactions and claims to ownership in contemporary Papua New Guinea. New Delhi: UBS Publishers Distributors Ltd.
STRATHERN, M.; LEACH, E. 2004. Introduction. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATH CRN, M. (Eds.). Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus of Melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn Press.
SYKES, K. 2001. Introduction: A case study approach to cultural property in the New Guinea Islands region. In: SYKES, K. et al. Culture and cultural property in the New Guinea Islands Region: seven case studies. New Dehli: UBS Publishers Distributors Ltd.
TAUBES, G. 1995. Scientists Attacked for “Patenting” Pacific Tribe. Science, n. 270(17): 1112.
TAULI-CORPUZ, V. 1999. TRIPS and its potential impacts on indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples and intellectual property rights (IPR ). Tebtebba Briefing Paper 5, Baguio City, Philippines: Tebtebba Foundation. Available at: <www.tebtebba.org/about_us/publications/bp/bp.htm>.
TIERNEY, P. 2000. Darkness in El Dorado: how scientists and journalists devastated the Amazon. New York. In: NORTON, W. W.; VAIL, J. 1993. The impact of the Mt. Kare Goldrush on the people of the Tari District. In: TAUFA, T.; BASS, C. (Eds.). Population, family, health and development. Port Moresby: University of Papua New Guinea.
WEISS, K. M. 1996. Biological diversity is inherent in humanity. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 26-28.
WIPO. 1997. 1967, 1982, 1984: Attempts to provide international protection for folklore by Intellectual Property Rights. UNESCO-WIPO World Forum on the Protection o f Folklore. Phucket, Thailand, 8-10 April 1997. WIPO <www.wipo.int>.
ALTMAN, D. 2002. Just how far can trading o f emissions be extended? The New York Times, 31 May 2002, Business Day. C l. 13.
ANDERSON, W. 2000. The possession o f kuru: medical science and biocolonial exchange. Comparative Studies o f Society and History, n .42: 713-744.
AOKI, K. 1998. Biocolonialism, anticommons property, and biopiracy in the (Not- So-Brave). New World Order o f International Intellectual Property Protection, Indiana Journal o f Global Legal Studies, n. 6:11-58. In: APPADURAI, A. (Ed.). 1986. The social life o f things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BANKS, G.; BALLARD, B. (Eds.). 1997. The ok tedi settlement: Issues, outcomes and implications. National Centre for Development Studies, Pacific Policy Paper 27, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Canberra: The Australian National University, and Resource
Management in Asia-Pacific, Research school o f pacific and asian studies, Canberra: The Australian National University.
BARRON, A. 1998. No other law? Authority, property and aboriginal art. In: BENTLEY L.;
MARIATIS, S. (Eds.). Intellectual property and ethics. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
BECK, U. 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
BELEJACK, B. 2001. The professor and the plants: prospecting for problems in Chiapas. Texas observer (Austin), 22 June 2001, p. 8-13, n. 29. Available at: <www.texasobserver.org>.
BHATS, A. 1996. The National Institutes of Health and the Papua New Guinea Cell Line. In: FRIEDLAENDER, R. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 29-31.
BIAGIOLI, M. 1998. The instability o f authorship: credit and responsibility in contemporaryn Biomedicine, FASEB, n. 12: 3-16.
BOYD, D. J. 1996. A tale o f “First Contact” : the Hagahai o f Papua New Guinea. Research in Melanesia, n. 20: 103-140.
BROWN, M. 1998. Can culture be copyrighted? Current Anthropology, n. 39(2): 193-222.
______ . 2003. Who owns native culture? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BROWNE, N.; COOKE, T. et al. 1983. Ok tedi 24:00. Brisbane: Thomas Cooke and associates for ok tedi mining limited.
BRUSH, S. B. 1996. Indigenous knowledge o f biological resources and intellectual property rights: the role of anthropology. American Anthropologist, n. 95(2): 653-686.
_________. 1 9 9 9 . Bioprospecting the public domain. Cultural Anthropology, n. 14(4): 535-555.
BUSSE, M.; WHIMP, K. 2000. Introduction. In: WHIMP, K.; BUSSE, M. (Eds.). Protection o f intellectual, biological and cultural property in Papua New Guinea. Canberra and Port Moresby: Asia Pacific Press and Conservation Melanesia Inc.
BYRNE, J. 1995. Rex Dagi et al. The broken hill proprietary company limited, n. 5782 of 1994 and others. Victorian Supreme Court of Melbourne, 10 November, 1995.
CHAPMAN, P.; BURCHETT, M.; CAMPBELL, P.; DIETRICH, W.; HART, B. 2000. Ok Tedi Mining, Ltd. (OTML). Environment Peer Review Group (PRG): Comments on key issues and review comments on the final human and ecological risk assessment documents. April 2000. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
CROOK, T. 2004. Transactions in perpetual motion. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus of melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn.
CUNNINGHAM, H. 1998. Colonial encounters in postcolonial contexts: patenting indigenous DNA and the human genome diversity project. Critique o f Anthropology, n. 18(2): 205-233.
DIVECHA, S. 2001. Private Power. Originally published on ZNET (www.zmag.org). Available at: <www.mpi.org.au/oktedi/private_power.html>.
DOMINGUEZ, V. 1992. Invoking culture: the messy side of cultural politics. South Atlantic Quarterly, n. 91(1): 19-42.
______ . 2001. Reply to Stuart Kirsch, Lost worlds: environmental disaster, culture loss, and the Law. Current Anthropology, n. 42(2): 182-183.
DOVE, M. R. 1994. Marketing the rain forest: Green Panacea or Red Herring? Asia Pacific Issues, n. 13: 1-8. Honolulu: East-West Center.
_______Ӣ 1996. Center, periphery, and Biodiversity: a paradox o f governance and a developmental challenge. In: BRUSH, S. B.; STAB INSKY, D. (Eds.). Valuing local knowledge: indigenous people and intellectual property rights. Washington, DC: Island Press.
ENVIRONMENTAL Defense. 2002. Farmers and Electric Company Strike a Unique Deal to Slow Global Warming. Available at:
<www.environmentaldefense.org/article.cfm?contentid=1669>.
ESCOBAR, A. 2001. Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, n. 20(2): 139-174.
EVANS, G.2002. Dealing with the Hardest Issues. Mining Monitor, n. 7(1): 11.
FEENY, D.; BIRKES, F.; McCAY, B. J.; ACHESON, J. M. 1990. The tragedy o f the commons: twenty-two years later. Human ecology, n. 18(1): 1-19. In: FILER, C. 1997. Compensation,
rent and power in Papua New Guinea. In: TOFT, S. (Ed.). Compensation fo r resource development in papua New Guinea. Port Moresby and Canberra: Law Reform Commission o f Papua New Guinea, Monograph n. 6, and National Centre for Development Studies,
Pacific Policy Paper 24.
FILER, C. 1997. Compensation, rent and power in Papua New Guinea. In: TOFT, S. (Ed.). Compensation fo r resource development in Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby and Canberra: Law Reform Commission of Papua New Guinea, Monograph n. 6, and National Centre for Development Studies, Pacific Policy Paper 24.
FISHLOCK, T. 1993. Brawling over Souls in God’s Last Battlefield: Lost-Tribe Missionaries
Damned as Unchristian. The Sunday Telegraph, 22 August, p. 20. NEXIS Library, News.
FRIEDLAENDER, J. 1996. Introduction. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, Peoples, and Property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 22-25.
GOLDMAN, M. (Ed.). 1998. Privatising nature: political struggles for the global commons. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
GORDON, J. 1997. The ok tedi lawsuit in retrospect. In: BANKS, G.; BALLARD, C. (Eds.). The ok tedi settlement: issues, outcomes and implications. Canberra: National Centre for Development Studies and Resource Management in the Asia-Pacific.
GREELY, H. T. 1998. Legal, ethical, and social issues in human genome research. Annual Review o f Anthropology, n. 27: 473-502.
HARDIN, G. 1968. The tragedy o f the commons. Science, n. 162(3859): 1243-1248.
HARRISON, S. 1993. The commerce o f cultures in Melanesia. Man (n.s.), n. 28: 139-158.
______ . 2000. From Prestige goods to legacies: property and the objectification o f culture in melanesia. Comparative studies in society and history, n. 42: 662-679.
HAYDEN, C. 1998. A biodiversity sampler for the millennium. In: FRANKLIN, S.; RAGONÉ, H. (Eds.). Reproducing reproduction: kinship, power, and technological innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
HIGGINS, R. J. 2002. Ok tedi: creating community partnerships for sustainable development. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
HIRSCH, E. 2004. Boundaries o f Creation: the work o f credibility in science and ceremony. In:
HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). Trmisactiom and creations: property and the stimulus of melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). 2004. Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus o f melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn. Ibeji, Y. and K. Gane 1996. The Hagahai Patent Controversy. Their Own Words. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 33.
JACKSON, J. E. 1995. Culture, genuine and spurious: the politics o f indianness in the Vaupés, Colombia. American Ethnologist, n. 22(1): 3-27.
JENKINS, C. L. 1987. Medical anthropology in the western schrader range, Papua New Guinea. National Geographic Research, n. 3: 412-30.
KALINOE, L. 2004. Legal options for the regulation of intellectual and cultural property in Papua New Guinea. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATHERN, M. (Eds.). Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus o f melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn. Kalinoe, L. and J. Simet. 1999. “Cultural Policy to Oversee Management of Cultures, Cultural Material” , The Independent, 23 September 1999, p. 13. Keesing, R. 1989. Creating the Past: Custom and identity in the contemporary pacific. The contemporary pacific, n. 1-2: 19-42.
KIMBRELL, A. 1996. Biocolonization: the patenting of life and the global market in Body Parts. In: MANDER, J.; GOLDSMITH, E. (Eds.). The case against the global economy and fo r a turn toward the local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.
KIRSCH, S. 1997. Lost tribes: indigenous people and the social imaginary. Anthropological Quarterly, n. 70(2): 58-67.
______ . 2001a. Property effects: social networks and compensation claims in Melanesia. Social Anthropology, n. 9(2): 147-163.
______ . 2001b. Lost worlds: environmental disaster, “Culture Loss” and the Law. Current Anthropology, n. 42(2): 67-98.
______ . 2002. Anthropology and advocacy: a case study o f the campaign against the ok tedi mine. Critique o f Anthropology, n. 22(2): 175-200.
KOPYTOFF, I. 1996. The cultural biography o f things: commoditization as process. In:
APPADURAI, A. (Ed.). The social life o f things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: University o f Cambridge.
LILOQULA, R. 1996. Value o f life: saving genes versus saving indigenous peoples. In:
FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 42-45.
LOCK, M. 1994. Interrogating the Human Diversity Genome Project. Social Science and Medicine, n. 39(5): 603-606. In: LOCKE, J. 1960[1698]. Two treatises o f government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MACPHERSON, C. B. 1962. The political theory o f possessive individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MANGI, J. 1988. On the question o f the “Lost Tribes” : a report on a field trip o f 24-20 April
1985. University o f Papua New Guinea Schrader Mountains Report n. 4. Research in Melanesia, n. 9: 37-65.
MARKS, J. 1995. The human genome diversity project AAA Newsletter n. 36(4): 72. In:
MAURER, B. 1999. Forget Locke? From Proprietor to Risk-Bearer in New Logics o f Finance. Public Culture, n. 11(2): 365-385.
VAN MEIJL, T.; VON BEND A-B ECKMANN, F.L. (Eds.). 1999. Property rights and economic development. Land and natural resources in southeast Asia and Oceania. London: Kegan Paul International.
MILTON, K. 1996. Environmentalism and cultural theory: exploring the role of anthropological in environmental discourse. New York: Routledge.
MUEHLEBACH, A. 2001. Making place at the United Nations: indigenous cultural politics at the UN Working Group on Indigenous Populations. Cultural Anthropology, n. 16(3): 415-448.
NELSON, R. D.; MAZZOLEN1, R. 1997. Economic theories about the costs and benefits of patents. Intellectual property rights and the dissemination o f research tools in molecular biology: summary o f a workshop help at the national academy. National Academy Press. Available at <www.nap.edu/openbook/0309057485/html/17.html>.
OK TEDI, Mining. 2003. Corporate website. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
PÁLSSON, G.; HARDARDÓTTIR, K. E. 2002. For Whom the Cell Tolls: Debates about Biomedicine. Current Anthropology, n. 43(2): 271-301.
PARAMETR1X, Inc.; URS Greiner Woodward Clyde. 1999. Draft Executive Summary: assessment o f human health and ecological risks for proposed mine waste mitigation options at the ok tedi mine, Papua New Guinea. Detailed Level Risk Assessment. Prepared for Ok Tedi Mining, Ltd., p. 1-15,6 August. Available at: <www.oktedi.com>.
PERKS, R.; G. WETSTONE, G. 2003. Rewriting the Rules, Year-End Report, 2002: The Bush Administration’s Assault on the Environment Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.
PIETZ, W. 1999. The fetish o f civilization: sacrificial blood and monetary debt. In: PELS,
P.; SALEMINK, O. (Eds.). Colonial subjects: essays on the practical history o f anthropology. Ann Arbor, MI: University o f Michigan Press.
POVINELLI, E.A. 2001. Radical worlds: the anthropology o f incommensurability and inconceivability. Annual Review of Anthropology, n. 30: 319-334.
______ . 2002. The cunning o f recognition: indigenous alterities and the making of australian multiculturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
PURI, K. 2001. Draft model law for the pacific. Draft published as model law fo r the protection o f traditional knowledge and expressions o f culture. Working and information Papers, 2nd Working group for Legal Experts on the Protection o f Traditional Knowledge and Expressions of Culture, Noumea, New Caledonia, 2003.
RABINOW, P. 1996. Severing the ties: fragmentation and dignity in Late Modernity. In:
RABINOW, P. (Ed.). Essays on the Anthropology o f Reason. Princeton, NJ: University of Princeton Press.
______ . 2002. Midst anthropology’s problems. The 2001 David M. Schneider Distinguished Lecture. Cultural Anthropology, n. 17(2): 135-149.
RAMOS, A. R. 2000. The commodification of the Indian. Série Antropologia. Departamento de Antropologia, Universidade de Brasília, n. 281: 1-17.
RIORDAN, T. 1995. A recent patent on a Papua New Guinea Tribe’s cell line prompts outrage and charges of “Biopiracy”. The New York Times, 27 November: D2.
ROSE, C. M. 1994. Property and persuasion: essays on the history, theory, and rhetoric of ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
______ . 2000. Expanding the choices for the global commons: comparing newfangled tradable emission allowance schemes to old-fashioned common property regimes. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Review, n. 10: 45-72.
ROSEN, L. 1997. The right to be different: indigenous peoples and the quest for a unified theory. The Yale Law Journal, n. 107(1): 227-259.
SAHLINS, M. 1999. What is anthropological enlightenment? Some lessons of the twentieth century. Annual Review o f Anthropology, n. 28: I-XXIII.
SANTOS, R. V. 2002. Indigenous peoples, postcolonial contexts and genomic research in the late 20th century: a view from Amazonia 1960-2000. Critique o f Anthropology, n. 22(1): 81-104.
SCOTT, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
SENGI, D. 1996. The Challenge o f the Hagahai Blood Saga. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 40. Excerpted from Viewpoint. Uni Tavur (student newspaper o f University o f Papua New Guinea), 4 August, 1995.
SHIVA, V.; HOLLA-BHAR, R. 1996. Piracy by patent: the case o f the neem tree. In:
GOLDSMITH, E.; MANDER, J. (Eds.). The case against the global economy and fo r a turn towards Localization. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club.
SILLITOE, P. 1998. The development of indigenous knowledge. Current Anthropology, n. 39(2): 223-252.
SOTO, H. de. 2000. The mystery o f capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and Fails Everywhere Else. New York: Basic Books.
STRATHERN, M. 1996. Cutting the Network. Journal o f the Royal Anthropological Institute, n, 2: 517-535.
______ . 1999. Property, substance and effect. Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press.
______ . 2001. Global and Local Contexts. In: KALINOE, L.; LEACH, J. (Eds.). Rationales o f ownership: ethnographic studies of transactions and claims to ownership in contemporary Papua New Guinea. New Delhi: UBS Publishers Distributors Ltd.
STRATHERN, M.; LEACH, E. 2004. Introduction. In: HIRSCH, E.; STRATH CRN, M. (Eds.). Transactions and creations: property and the stimulus of Melanesia. Oxford: Berghahn Press.
SYKES, K. 2001. Introduction: A case study approach to cultural property in the New Guinea Islands region. In: SYKES, K. et al. Culture and cultural property in the New Guinea Islands Region: seven case studies. New Dehli: UBS Publishers Distributors Ltd.
TAUBES, G. 1995. Scientists Attacked for “Patenting” Pacific Tribe. Science, n. 270(17): 1112.
TAULI-CORPUZ, V. 1999. TRIPS and its potential impacts on indigenous peoples. Indigenous peoples and intellectual property rights (IPR ). Tebtebba Briefing Paper 5, Baguio City, Philippines: Tebtebba Foundation. Available at: <www.tebtebba.org/about_us/publications/bp/bp.htm>.
TIERNEY, P. 2000. Darkness in El Dorado: how scientists and journalists devastated the Amazon. New York. In: NORTON, W. W.; VAIL, J. 1993. The impact of the Mt. Kare Goldrush on the people of the Tari District. In: TAUFA, T.; BASS, C. (Eds.). Population, family, health and development. Port Moresby: University of Papua New Guinea.
WEISS, K. M. 1996. Biological diversity is inherent in humanity. In: FRIEDLAENDER, J. (Ed.). Genes, people, and property. Cultural Survival Quarterly, n. 20(2): 26-28.
WIPO. 1997. 1967, 1982, 1984: Attempts to provide international protection for folklore by Intellectual Property Rights. UNESCO-WIPO World Forum on the Protection o f Folklore. Phucket, Thailand, 8-10 April 1997. WIPO <www.wipo.int>.
Downloads
Publicado
2018-02-19
Como Citar
Kirsch, Stuart. 2018. “Property Limits: Debates on the Body, Nature Na Culture in Melanesia”. Anuário Antropológico 28 (1):193-224. https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/6839.
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Licença
Copyright (c) 2003 Anuário Antropológico
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons - Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
