O pensamento disruptivo do cuidado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4000/aa.10539Palavras-chave:
Maria Puig de la Bellacasa, Antropologia dos cuidados, estudos da ciência e da tecnologia×Resumo
Cuidado, cuidando, cuidadora. Palavras carregadas, contestadas. Ainda assim, tão comuns na vida cotidiana, é como se o cuidado fosse natural, para além de alguma expertise ou conhecimento particular. A maioria de nós precisa do cuidado, sente o cuidado, é cuidada ou encontra o cuidado em uma ou outra forma. O cuidado é onipresente, inclusive através dos efeitos da sua ausência. Como um sentimento de falta que emana dos efeitos da negligência, ele passa dentro, através, por todas as coisas. Sua falta desfaz, permite que se desemaranhe. Cuidar pode nos fazer sentir bem; também pode nos fazer sentir péssimas. O cuidado pode fazer o bem; também pode oprimir. Seu caráter essencial para os seres humanos e os inúmeros seres vivos faz com que todas sejam suscetíveis a ceder a esse controle. Mas o que é o cuidado? É um afeto? Uma obrigação moral? Trabalho? Um fardo? Uma alegria? Algo que podemos aprender ou praticar? Algo que simplesmente fazemos? Cuidado significa todas essas coisas e coisas diferentes para pessoas diferentes, em situações diferentes. Assim, embora as formas de cuidado possam ser identificadas, pesquisadas e compreendidas concreta e empiricamente, o cuidado permanece ambivalente em seu significado e ontologia.
Downloads
Referências
Abbots, Emma-Jayne, Anna Lavis, e Luci Attala, eds. 2015. Careful Eating: Bodies, Food, and Care. London: Ashgate.
Atkinson-Graham, Melissa, Martha Kenney, Kelly Ladd, Cameron Michael Murray, e Emily Astra-Jean Simmonds. 2015. “Care in Context: Becoming an STS Researcher”. Social Studies of Science 45, nº 5: 738–48.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Barbagallo, Camille, e Silvia Federici, eds. 2012. Care Work and the Commons: The Commoner. A web journal for other values. https://thecommoner.org/back-issues/issue-15-winter-2012/
Beuret, Nicholas. 2015. “Organising against the End of the World: The Praxis of Ecological Catastrophe”. Tese de doutorado, University of Leicester, Leicester.
*Bispo dos Santos, Antônio. 2019. Colonização, quilombos. Modos e significações. Brasília: Ayó.
Boris, Eileen, e Rhacel Parrenas. 2010. Intimate Labors: Cultures, Technologies, and the Politics of Care. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. “Posthuman Humanities: Life beyond Theory”. In The Posthuman, 143–85. Cambridge: Polity.
Brown, Gareth, Emma Dowling, David Harvie, e Keir Milburn. 2012. “Careless Talk: Social Reproduction and Fault Lines of the Crisis in the United Kingdom”. Social Justice: A Journal of Crime, Conflict, and World Order 39, nº 1: 78–98.
Cohen, Rachel Lara. 2011. “Time, Space, and Touch at Work: Body Work and Labour Process (Re)Organisation”. Sociology of Health & Illness 33, nº 2: 189–205.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1986. “Learning from the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought”. Social Problems 33, nº 6: S14–S32.
DOI : 10.2307/800672
Curtin, Deane. 1993. “Towards an Ecological Ethic of Care”. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 6, nº 1: 60–74.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00209.x
*Descola, Philippe. 1986. La nature domestique. Symbolisme et praxis dans l´ecologie des achuar. Paris. Edition de la Maison de Sciences de l' Homme.
DOI : 10.4000/books.editionsmsh.25673
Despret, Vincianne. 2004. “The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-zoogenesis”. Body & Society 10, nº 2-3: 111–34.
Dewey, John. 1958. Art as Experience. New York: Capricorn Books.
Donovan, Josephine, e Carol J. Adams, eds. 2010. Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals. New York: Continuum.
Engster, Daniel. 2009. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI : 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199214358.001.0001
Gatzia, Dimitria. 2011. “The Ethics of Care and Economic Theory: A Happy Marriage?” In Applying Care Ethics to Business, editado por M. Hammington e M. Sander-Staudt. Issues in Business Ethics 34. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
DOI : 10.4159/9780674037618
* Gilligan, Carol. 1982. Uma Voz Diferente: Psicologia da Diferença entre Homens e Mulheres da Infância à Idade Adulta. Tradução por Nathanael C. Caixeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos.
* Gilligan, Carol. 2021. Uma voz diferente. Tradução por Renan Marques Birro. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes.
Goodman, Michael K. 2013. “iCare capitalism? The Biopolitics of Choice in a Neoliberal Economy of Hope”. International Political Sociology 7, nº 1: 103–5.
DOI : 10.1111/ips.12011_6
Goodman, Michael K., e Emily Boyd. 2011. “A Social Life for Carbon? Commodification, Markets, and Care”. Geographical Journal 177, nº 2: 102–9.
Hankivsky, Olena. 2004. Social Policy and the Ethic of Care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Haraway, Donna. 2011. “Speculative Fabulations for Technoculture’s Generations: Taking Care of Unexpected Country”. Australian Humanities Review, nº 50: 95–118.
Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
DOI : 10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. “The Feminist Standpoint: Toward a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism”. In Money, Sex, and Power: Toward a Feminist Historical Materialism, editado por Nancy Hartsock, 231–51. New York: Longman.
Hess, David J. 2007. “Crosscurrents: Social Movements and the Anthropology of Science and Technology”. American Anthropologist 109, nº 3: 463–72.
DOI : 10.1525/aa.2007.109.3.463
Hoagland, Sarah L. 1991. “Some Thoughts about Caring”. In Feminist Ethics: New Essays, editado por Claudia Card, 246–63. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Jerak-Zuiderent, Sonja. 2015. “Accountability from Somewhere and for Someone: Relating with Care”. Science as Culture 24, nº 4: 412–35.
Kershaw, Paul. 2005. Carefair: Rethinking the Responsibilities and Rights of Citizenship. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press
King, Katie. 2012. Networked Reenactments: Stories Transdisciplinary Knowledges Tell. Durham: Duke University Press.
DOI : 10.2307/j.ctv1198wfj
Kirksey, S. Eben. 2015. Emergent Ecologies. Durham: Duke University Press.
DOI : 10.2307/j.ctv11cvzzq
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kittay, Eva Feder, e Ellen K. Feder. 2002. The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
*Kopenawa, Davi, e Bruce Albert. 2016. A queda do céu. Palavras de um xamã yanomami. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Kortright, Chris. 2013. “On Labor and Creative Transformations in the Experimental Fields of the Philippines”. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, nº 7: 557–78.
DOI : 10.1215/18752160-2392710
*Krenak, Ailton. O amanhã não está à venda. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020.
Kröger, Teppo. 2009. “Care Research and Disability Studies: Nothing in Common?” Critical Social Policy 29, nº 3: 398–420.
DOI : 10.1177/0261018309105177
Lappé, Martine. 2014. “Taking Care: Anticipation, Extraction, and the Politics of Temporality in Autism Science”. Biosocieties 9, nº 3: 304–28.
DOI : 10.1057/biosoc.2014.14
Latimer, Joanna. 2000. The Conduct of Care: Understanding Nursing Practice. London: Blackwell.
Latimer, Joanna, e Mara Miele, eds. 2013. “Naturecultures? Science, Affect, and the Non-Human”. Special Issue of Theory, Culture and Society 30: 7–8.
DOI : 10.1177/0263276413502088
Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”. Critical Inquiry, nº 30: 225-48.
DOI : 10.1086/421123
Lezaun, Javier, e Steve Woolgar, eds. 2013. “A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies?”. Special issue of Social Studies of Science 43, nº 3: 321–40.
Martin, Brian. 1993. “The Critique of Science Becomes Academic”. Science, Technology & Human Values 18, nº 2: 247–59.
DOI : 10.1177/016224399301800208
Martin, Aryn, Natasha Myers, e Ana Viseu, eds. 2015. “The Politics of Care in Technoscience”. Special Issue of Social Studies of Science 45, nº 5: 625–41.
Mayberry, Maralee, Banu Subramaniam, e Lisa Weasel, eds. 2001. Feminist Science Studies: A New Generation. New York: Routledge.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203614266
Metzger, Jonathan. 2013. “Placing the Stakes: The Enactment of Territorial Stakeholders in Planning Processes”. Environment and Planning A 45, nº 4: 781–96.
DOI : 10.1068/a45116
Metzger, Jonathan. 2014. “Spatial Planning and/as Caring for More-Than-Human Place”. Environment and Planning A 46, nº 5: 1001–11.
Mol, Anne Marie. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. New York: Routledge.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203927076
Mol, Anne Marie, Ingunn Moser, e Jeannette Pols, eds. 2010. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes, and Farms. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Muller, Ruth. 2012. On Becoming a ‘Distinguished’ Scientist: Careers, Individuality, and Collectivity in Postdoctoral Researchers’ Accounts on Living and Working in the Life Sciences. Sociology/Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna.
Murphy, M. 2015. “Unsettling Care: Troubling Transnational Itineraries of Care in Feminist Health Practices”. Social Studies of Science 45, nº 5: 717–37.
DOI : 10.1177/0306312715589136
Nair, Indira. 2001. “Science and Technology with Care: Structuring Science in the Framework of Care, Multiplicity, and Integrity”. Journal of College Science Teaching 30, nº 4: 274–77.
Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
DOI : 10.4159/harvard.9780674061194
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
DOI : 10.1525/9780520957343
Perez-Bustos, Tania. 2014. “Of Caring Practices in the Public Communication of Science: Seeing through Trans Women Scientists’ Experiences”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 39, nº 4: 857–66.
Papadopoulos, Dimitris. 2010. “Insurgent Posthumanism”. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 10, nº 2: 134–51.
Precarias a la Deriva. 2004. A la deriva, por los circuitos de la precariedad femenina. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2013. Politiques féministes et construction des savoirs : Penser nous devons! Paris: L’Harmattan.
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2014. “Encountering Bioinfrastructure: Ecological Struggles and the Sciences of Soil”. Social Epistemology 28, nº 1: 26–40.
Rose, Hilary. 1983. “Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences”. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 9, nº 1: 73–90.
Rose, Hilary. 1994. Love, Power, and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rose, Hilary, e Steven Rose. 1976. The Radicalisation of Science: Ideology Of/In the Natural Sciences. London: Macmillan.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-349-86145-3
Sánchez Criado, Tomás, Israel Rodríguez-Giralt, e Arianna Mencaroni. 2016. “Care in the (Critical) Making: Open Prototyping, or the Radicalization of Independent-Living Politics”. ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research 10, nº 1: 24–39.
Savransky, Martin. 2014. “Wondering about What Matters: The Adventure of Relevance and a Social Science to Come”. Paper presented at “Beyond Matter, Beyond Concerns?”, organized by the STS-Barcelona group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, June 25.
Sevenhuijsen, Selma. 1998. Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality, and Politics. New York: Routledge.
DOI : 10.4324/9780203169384
*Shiva, Vandana. “Resources”. 1992. In The Development Dictionary: a Guide to Knowledge As Power, edited by Wolfgang Sachs. Zed Books: London & New York.
Singleton, Vicky, e John Law. 2013. “Devices as Rituals: Notes on Enacting Resistance”. Journal of Cultural Economy 6, nº 3: 259–77.
Sismondo, Sergio. 2008. “Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program”. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, editado por Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, e Judy Wajcman, 13–32. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sismondo, Sergio. 2010. Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. “Power, Technologies, and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions”. In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination, editado por John Law, 26–56. New York: Routledge.
Star, Susan Leigh, ed. 1995. Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2004. “Devenir philosophe: Un goût pour l’aventure?” In La vocation philosophique, editado por Bayard-Centre Pompidou, 37–68. Paris: Centre Pompidou-Bayard.
Suchman, Lucy. 2007a. “Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial”. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, editado por Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, e Judy Wajcman, 3ª ed., 139–163. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Suchman, Lucy. 2007b. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2ª ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ticktin, Miriam. 2011. Casualties of Care. Berkeley: University of California Press.
DOI : 10.1525/9780520950535
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
DOI : 10.4324/9781003070672
Van Dooren, Thom. 2005. “‘I would rather be a god/dess than a cyborg’: A Pagan Encounter with Donna Haraway”. Pomegranate 7, nº 1: 42–58.
*Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2002. “Perspectivismo e multinaturalismo na América Indigena”. In A inconstância da alma selvagem, Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, 345–99. São Paulo: Cosac & Naify.
*Vilaça, Aparecida. 2000. “O que significa tornar-se outro? Xamanismo e contato interétnico na Amazônia”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 15, nº 44: 56–72.
Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
DOI : 10.7208/chicago/9780226692685.001.0001
Woolf, Virginia. 1996. A Room of One’s Own and Three Guineas. London: Vintage.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário Antropológico
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en
Creative Commons - Atribución- 4.0 Internacional - CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en
