Política de comunicações dos Estados Unidos pós-convergência

Autori

  • François Bar
  • Christian Sandvig

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v1i1.21735

Parole chiave:

política de comunicações, Estados Unidos, pós-convergência, direito de publicar, direito de intercâmbio privado, direito de conceber plataformas de comunicação

Abstract

Os sistemas de comunicações estão convergindo, mas a política de comunicação tem evoluído no sentido de submeter as diferentes mídias a diferentes doutrinas. Muitas das soluções para uma política de comunicação pós-convergência são ajustes às categorias regulatórias herdadas do passado. Em vez de seguir com essa tendência, este artigo revisita os objetivos subjacentes de formulação de políticas públicas de todas as mídias. Em primeiro lugar, este artigo apresenta um modelo conceitual para a política de comunicação como um processo de inércia marcado por crises. Em segundo lugar, ele aplica esse modelo a uma brevíssima história dessa política nos Estados Unidos, enfocando a imprensa, os correios, a telefonia, a radiodifusão e a internet. Em terceiro lugar, a partir dessa análise, o artigo propõe abordagens úteis num ambiente resultante do processo convergente, distinguindo-se três metas políticas subjacentes: o direito de publicar, o direito de intercâmbio privado, e o direito de conceber plataformas de comunicação.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Biografie autore

François Bar

Professor Associado na Annenberg School for Communication, da University of Southern California, em Los Angeles. Ex-diretor e membro da Annenberg Research Network on International Communications (ARNIC).

Christian Sandvig

Professor Assistente e Professor Assistente Pesquisador no Coordinated Science Laboratory da University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Associate Fellow de Socio-Legal Studies da Oxford University.

Riferimenti bibliografici

BAR, F. (1990) Configuring the Telecommunications Infrastructure for the Computer Age: The Economics of Network Control, BRIE Working Paper 43. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.
BAR, F., S. Cohen, P. Cowhey, B. DeLong, M. Kleeman and J. Zysman (2000) ‘Access and Innovation Policy for the Third-Generation Internet’, Telecommunications Policy 24(6”“7): 489”“518.
BENIGER, J.R. (1986) The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BENIGER, J.R. (1987) ‘Personalization of Mass Media and the Growth of Pseudo-community’, Communication Research 14(3): 352”“71.
CABINET COMMITTEE ON CABLE COMMUNICATIONS (1974) Cable ”“ Report to the President (‘The Whitehead Report’). Washington, DC: GPO.
CHANDLER, A.D. (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
ESBIN, B. (1998) Internet Over Cable: Defining the Future in Terms of the Past, OPP Working Paper Series 30. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.
FCC (1969a) ‘Memorandum of Opinion and Order’, Docket 18397, 23 FCC 2d 825. Washington, DC: FCC.
FCC (1969b) ‘First Report and Order’, Docket 18397, 23 FCC 2d 825. Washington, DC: FCC.
FISCHER, C. (1987) ‘“Touch Someone”: The Telephone Industry Discovers Sociability’, Technology and Culture 29(1): 32”“61.
HILL, R.S. and G.B.N. Hill (1880) The Life of Sir Rowland Hill and the History of Penny Postage. London: T. De La Rue and Co.
HORWITZ, R.B. (1989) The Irony of Regulatory Reform: The Deregulation of American Telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press.
INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE TASK FORCE (1994) Administration White Paper on Communications Act Reforms. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
LESSIG, L. (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
LUBRANO, A. (1997) The Telegraph: How Technology Innovation Caused Social Change. New York: Garland.
MCCHESNEY, R. (1993) Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy: The Battle for the Control of US Broadcasting, 1928”“1935. New York: Oxford University Press.
MELODY, W.H. (1996) ‘Toward a Framework for Designing Information Society Policies’, Telecommunications Policy 20(4): 243”“59.
MUELLER, M. (1997) Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
NEUMAN,W.R., L.W. McKnight and R.J. Solomon (1997) The Gordian Knot: Political Gridlock on the Information Highway. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
POOL, I. de Sola (1983) Technologies of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
POSTMASTER-GENERAL (1890) An Argument in Support of the Limited Post and Telegraph by the Postmaster-General Together with Certain Appendices Relating to Postal Telegraphy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
SAWHNEY, H. (1994) ‘Universal Service: Prosaic Motives and Great Ideals’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 38(4): 375”“95.
SMULYAN, S. (1994) Selling Radio: The Commercialization of American Broadcasting, 1920”“1934. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
STREETER, T. (1996) Selling the Air: A Critique of the Policy of Commercial Broadcasting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (1938) A Brief History of the United States Postal Service. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
VAN CUILENBURG, J. and P. Verhoest (1998) ‘Free and Equal Access: In Search of Policy Models for Converging Communication Systems’, Telecommunications Policy 22(3): 171”“81.
VIETOR, R.H.K. (1994) Contrived Competition: Regulation and Deregulation in America. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
VOGEL, S.K. (1996) Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
WILLIAMS, R. (1966) Communications. London: Chatto and Windus.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2009-05-11

Come citare

BAR, François; SANDVIG, Christian. Política de comunicações dos Estados Unidos pós-convergência. Law, State and Telecommunications Review, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 77–109, 2009. DOI: 10.26512/lstr.v1i1.21735. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/RDET/article/view/21735. Acesso em: 12 mag. 2024.