Ethics in E-Commerce
The Self-Regulation Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v17i1.54281Keywords:
E-commerce. Trust. Efficacy. Self-regulation. Safeguarding.Abstract
[Purpose] To explore the application and effectiveness of self-regulation tools in the e-commerce sector, focusing on their role in enhancing consumer protection in the digital world. The research seeks to evaluate how self-regulation mechanisms, such as codes of conduct, complement existing legal frameworks to protect consumer rights and build trust in online transactions.
[Methodology/approach/design] The study employs a comprehensive analysis of self-regulation concepts, examining their influence in various digital environments. It investigates the necessary conditions for effective self-regulation systems and the potential legal characteristics of these mechanisms. The research draws on theoretical and practical insights, comparing self-regulation tools with traditional contractual frameworks like adhesion contracts.
[Findings] The analysis reveals that self-regulation tools, particularly codes of conduct, play a significant role in filling gaps left by existing legal regulations. These tools enhance consumer protection by setting higher standards than those mandated by law. The study highlights the functional similarity between self-regulation instruments and adhesion contracts, noting that while they lack the coercive power of legal norms, they effectively standardize practices and build consumer trust.
[Practical implications] The findings suggest that businesses should adopt self-regulation tools to strengthen consumer trust and compliance with ethical standards. These tools can lead to improved consumer experiences and potentially reduce legal disputes by addressing issues that legal regulations may not cover comprehensively. The research underscores the need for businesses to publicize their adherence to these codes to maximize their impact on consumer trust and corporate reputation.
[Originality/value] This paper provides a detailed examination of self-regulation tools in e-commerce, offering new insights into their legal nature and practical applications. It is valuable for policymakers, e-commerce businesses, and consumer protection agencies interested in understanding how voluntary compliance mechanisms can enhance legal frameworks and improve consumer protection in the digital marketplace.
Downloads
References
CQUISTI, A.; BRANDIMARTE, L.; LOEWENSTEIN, G. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science, 347(6221), 509-514, 2015.
BINNS, R. Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 149-159, 2018.
BROWN, M. E.; TREVIÑO, L. K. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 1-16, 2014.
BYKOV, I.; CHERKASHCHENKO, T.; DORSKII, A.; KAVERINA, E. Government Regulation of Advertising in the Eurasian Economic Union: Contradictions of Public Policy and Advertising Ethics. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2S), 116-120, 2015.
CATH, C.; WACHTER, S.; MITTELSTADT, B.; TADDEO, M.; FLORIDI, L. Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505-528, 2018.
CUSUMANO, M. A.; GAWER, A.; YOFFIE, D. B. Can Self-Regulation Save Digital Platforms? Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(5), 1259-1285, 2021.
DICKINSON-DELAPORTE, S.; MORTIMER, K.; KERR, G.; WALLER, D. S.; KENDRICK, A. Power and responsibility: Advertising self‐regulation and consumer protection in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Affairs 54(2), 675-700, 2020.
FEENSTRA, R. A.; GONZÁLEZ ESTEBAN, E. Autocontrol: A Critical Study of Achievements and Challenges in the Pursuit of Ethical Advertising Through an Advertising Self-Regulation System. Journal Business Ethics 154(2), 341–354, 2019.
FISHMAN, J. A Comparison of Securities Law Violations in the UK and US. Corporate Law, (14), 160-170, 1993.
FLORIDI, L. The Right to Be Forgotten: a Philosophical View. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik - Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 23(1), 30-45, 2015.
FLORIDI, L.; COWLS, J.; BELTRAMETTI, M.; CHATILA, R.; CHAZERAND, P.; DIGNUM, V.; LUETGE, C.; MADELIN, R.; PAGALLO, U.; ROSSI, F.; SCHAFER, B.; VALCKE, P.; VAYENA, E. AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707, 2018.
FLORIDI, L. Soft ethics, the governance of the digital and the General Data Protection Regulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376(2133), 20180081, 2018.
FLORIDI, L. Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 185-193, 2019.
FLORIDI, L. The End of an Era: from Self-Regulation to Hard Law for the Digital Industry. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 619–622, 2021.
GAUTRAIS, V. La certificación de qualité des sites internet: un sésame voué á la securité du consommateur. Revue Ubiquité, (3), 91-92, 1999.
JOBIN, A.; IENCA, M.; VAYENA, E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389-399, 2019.
KAHAN, M. Some Problems with Stock Exchange-Based Securities Regulation. Virginia Law Review, 83(7), 1509-1519, 1997.
LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D.; DITTMAR, E. C; VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. Protecting minors in relation to interactive software. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, 13(1), 20-39, 2021a.
LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D.; DITTMAR, E. C; VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. Self-regulation of sustainability as a manifestation of corporate social responsibility. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27(3), 16-29, 2021b.
LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D.; DITTMAR, E. C; VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. The trusted third party or digital notary in Spain: effect on virtual transactions. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 36(3), 453-469, 2022.
LÓPEZ JIMÉNEZ, D.; DITTMAR, E. C; VARGAS PORTILLO, J. P. The Self-Regulating Jury in the Field of Interactive Advertising. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, 15(1), 1-30, 2023.
MITTELSTADT, B. D.; ALLO, P.; TADDEO, M.; WACHTER, S.; FLORIDI, L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2016.
PARSONS, A.; SCHUMACHER. C. Advertising Regulation and Market Drivers. European Journal of Marketing, 46 (11/12), 1539-1558, 2012.
PORTER, M. E.; KRAMER, M. R. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77, 2011.
PRESTON, I. Interaction of Law and Ethics in Matters of Advertisers’ Responsibility for Protecting Consumers. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(1), 259-264, 2010.
SMITH, A. Consumer trust in e-commerce: The role of transparency and responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(3), 475-489, 2020.
SPOSATO, M. Are leaders born or made? Asking the right question. Development and Learning in Organizations, 38(3), 1-3, 2024a.
SPOSATO, M. Leadership training and development in the age of artificial intelligence. Development and Learning in Organizations, 2024b.
SULLIVAN, R. S. Banking on compliance: The evolution of ethics in the financial sector. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26(3), 341-356, 2018.
TATO PLAZA, A. La autorregulación publicitaria, Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, Navarra, 2020.
WHITTLESTONE, J., NYRUP, R., ALEXANDROVA, A., DIHAL, K., & CAVE, S. The role and limits of principles in AI ethics: Towards a focus on tensions. Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 195-200, 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Law, State and Telecommunications Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,
I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
