AI Systems in Brazilian Supreme Federal Court and the Colombian Constitutional Court Experiences
Prospective Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v13i1.35614Keywords:
AI Systems. Brazilian Supreme Federal Court’s Victor. Colombian Constitutional Court’s PretorIA. Ethical framework of AI. Justice and 4th Industrial Revolution.Abstract
Purpose - To carry out a prospective analysis of the experience of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) and the Colombian Constitutional Court (CCC) with Artificial Intelligence (AI).
Methodology - In terms of methodology, we use the qualitative approach, where the data analysis technique is discourse analysis and the unit of analysis are official documents and reports related to disruptive technologies for judicial use, emphasizing those dedicated to “experience” Colombian with the Pretoria AI.
Findings - In Latin America, AI Systems, such as Victor and PretorIA, are automation tools supporting synthesis and prediction tasks in the supreme courts in Brazil and Colombia. However, they are not magic solutions to solve judicial congestion, although the 4th Industrial Revolution bring progress for positive changes. The significant challenges, however, are also in law theory through an ethical framework for the development, design, and operational work of AI. Nevertheless, our comprehension of those systems remains limited. For this reason, supreme courts must observe positive law and ethics to avoid a tyranny of the code, avoiding their impact over law sources’, preventing an algorithm from “deciding” the criteria for applying the law. Thus, supreme courts need to calibrate and influence its design, preventing its obsolescence, but, above all, preventing human dignity obsolescence, human labor, and power of deliberation. All these are essential for shaping version 4.0 of the Social Rule of Law.
Practical implications - Promote the engagement of magistrates and citizenship in design and programming of AI Systems for supreme courts’ use, within an ethical framework that prevents human beings, their values”‹, ”‹and their rights’ obsolescence.
Originality ”“ This paper analyzes AI ”‹”‹Systems used to solve supreme courts’ problems in Brazil and Colombia, studying how they work, but also its additional features considering theories that allow affirming that programming and design are subject to the Rule of Law rules and a Human Rights oriented ethical framework.
Downloads
References
AMAT, Y. Corte ahora usa inteligencia artificial para manejar alud de tutelas. El Tiempo, jan. 2020.
ASAMBLEA NACIONAL CONSTITUYENTE. Constitución Política de Colombia -Gaceta Constitucional No. 116 de 20 de julio de 1991ColombiaAlcaldía de Bogotá, , 1991.
ASHLEY, K. D. Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics: new tools for law practice in the digital age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
ASSEMBLÉIA NACIONAL CONSTITUINTE. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988Brasil, 1988.
CALDERON-VALENCIA, F.; SANTOS DE MORAIS, F. Inteligencia artificial y justicia: Reflexiones a partir de los casos de Brasil y Colombia. In: RAMÃREZ CARVAJAL, D. M. (Ed.). . Justicia digital. Una mirada internacional en época de crisis. 1. ed. Medellín: Editorial Justicia y Proceso, 2020. p. 161”“200.
CEPEJ. European ethical Charter on the use of Artificial Intelligence in judicial systems and their environmen. Strasbourg: [s.n.].
CEVASCO, L.; CORVALÁN, J. G.; LE FEVRE CERVINI, E. M. Inteligencia Artificial y trabajo. Construyendo un nuevo paradigma de empleo. 1. ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Astrea SRL, 2019.
CONFERENCIA IBEROAMERICANA DE MINISTROS DE ADMINISTRACIÓN PÚBLICA Y REFORMA DEL ESTADO. Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Electrónico -Aprobada por la IX Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ministros de Administración Pública y Reforma del Estado Pucón, Chile, 31 de mayo y 1° de junio de 2007ChileCLAD -Centro Iberoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo, , 2007.
CONGRESSO NACIONAL DO BRASIL. Projeto de Lei 21 de 2020. Estabelece princípios, direitos e deveres para o uso de inteligência artificial no Brasil, e dá outras providências.Brasilia - DF, 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.camara.leg.br/proposicoesWeb/prop_mostrarintegra?codteor=1853928>. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2020
CONSEJERÃA PRESIDENCIAL PARA ASUNTOS ECONÓMICOS Y TRANSFORMACIÓN DIGITAL. Marco Ético para la Inteligencia Artificial en Colombia. Bogotá D.C.: [s.n.].
CONSEJO NACIONAL DE POLÃTICA ECONÓMICA Y SOCIAL. Documento CONPES 3920 de 20182018-Conpes 3920Bogotá D.C., 2018. Disponível em: <https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Económicos/3920.pdf>
CORRALES, M.; FENWICK, M.; HAAPIO, H. (EDS.). Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain. Singapore: Springer, 2019.
CORVALÁN, J. G. L’algorithme et les droits de l’Homme. In: DE BOISDEFFRE, M. (Ed.). . Étude annuelle 2017 Puissance publique et plateformes numériques : accompagner l’«ubérisation». Paris: Conseil d État français, 2017. p. 179”“188.
CORVALÁN, J. G. Efficient States Putting Public-Sector Productivity Under the Microscope. Integration and Trade Journal, v. 22, n. 44, p. 238”“247, 2018.
CORVALÁN, J. G. Prometea. Inteligencia artificial para transformar organizaciones públicas. 1. ed. Buenos Aires: Editoria Astrea SRL, 2019.
COTINO HUESO, L. Ética en el diseño para el desarrollo de una Inteligencia Artificial, robótica y Big Data confiables y su utilidad desde el Derecho. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic, n. 58, p. 29”“48, 2019.
CRUZ E TUCCI, J. R. Súmula 343 do STF viabiliza o caminho da ação rescisória.
DATA & SOCIETY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. Event Summary: The Social, Cultural, & Ethical Dimensions of “Big Data”New YorkData & Society Research Institute., , 2014.
DE SIQUEIRA, J. E. El principio Responsabilidad de Hans Jonas . Bioethikos, v. 3, n. 2, p. 171”“193, 2009.
EBERS, M. Regulating AI and Robotics: Ethical and Legal Challenges. In: EBERS, M.; NAVAS, S. (Eds.). . Algorithms and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 37”“98.
ESGUERRA PORTOCARRERO, J. C. La protección constitucional del ciudadano. Bogotá: Legis, 2004.
ESTEVEZ, E.; FILLOTRANI, P.; LINARES LEJARRAGA, S. PROMETEA: Transformando la administración de justicia con herramientas de inteligencia artificial. Washington D.C.: BID, 2020.
FREEMAN, J. The Tyranny of Structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, v. 17, p. 151”“164, 1972.
GÓMEZ MONT, C. et al. La inteligencia artificial al servicio del bien social en América Latina y el Caribe: Panorámica regional e instantáneas de doce países. Washington D.C.: fAIr LAC, 2020.
GUTIÉRREZ OSSA, J. A.; FLOREZ HERNANDEZ, I. C. Inteligencia Artificial (IA) aplicada a la Justicia. Derecho Y Realidad, v. 18, n. 35, p. 53”“80, 2020.
HOTTOIS, G. ¿El transhumanismo es un humanismo? Bogotá: Universidad del Bosque, 2016.
JONAS, H. El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. 1a Ed. 199 ed. [s.l.] Herder, 1995.
LATIL, A. En attendant la Déclaration de droits fondamentaux du numérique. Dalloz IP/IT, v. 11, p. 593”“598, 2020.
OECD. Going Digital in Colombia. Paris: [s.n.].
OECD. Recommendation of the Council on OECD Legal Instruments Artificial Intelligence -OECD/LEGAL/0449. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
ONU. Resolución E/HLPF/2016/6 -Foro político de alto nivel sobre el desarrollo sostenible, Convocado bajo los auspicios del Consejo Económico y Social 11 a 20 de julio de 2016ONU, , 2016.
ONU. Resolución A/RES/71/256 -Nueva Agenda Urbana, Resolución aprobada por la Asamblea Generalel 23 de diciembre de 2016ONU, , 2017.
PEIXOTO, F. H. Projeto Victor: relato do desenvolvimento da Inteligência Artificial na Repercussão Geral do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Revista Brasileira de Inteligência Artificial e Direito, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1”“20, 2020.
PEÑA VALENZUELA, D. Promete Prometea! Inteligencia Artificial en la Corte Constitucional. Blog de los Negocios, mar. 2019.
RIVADENEIRA, J. C. Prometea, inteligencia artificial para la revisión de tutelas en la Corte Constitucional. Ambito-Jurídico (ed. Electrónica), mar. 2019.
RIVEROS, C. et al. Políticas públicas, brechas y alfabetización digital de la persona mayor. La realidad chilena mirada desde las comunas de Talca y San Joaquín. Revista de Direito, Estado e Telecomunicações, v. 12, n. 1, p. 137”“158, 2020.
RUIZ-VELASCO SÁNCHEZ, E. Inteligencia artificial: una utopía realizada Perfiles. Perfiles Educativos, v. 74, 1996.
STRECK, L. L. Jurisdição constitucional e decisão jurídica. 3. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2013.
SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. Uso de algemas (RHC 102.962/MG).
SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL. Relatório das atividades 2019. Brasília: [s.n.].
TERRONES RODRÃGUEZ, A. L. Inteligencia artificial y ética de la responsabilidad. Cuestiones de Filosofía, v. 4, n. 22, p. 141”“170, 2018.
WYNER, A. An Ontology in OWL for legal case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, v. 16, n. 4, p. 361”“387, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Law, State and Telecommunications Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,
I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
