Biografia como método nas Relações Internacionais
uma abordagem voltada para o ensino
Palavras-chave:
Biografia, Pedagogia, Relações InternacionaisResumo
A pedagogia do ensino de Relações Internacionais no Brasil está em um estágio incipiente. Este artigo busca dar uma contribuição a esse campo ao apresentar o método biográfico como uma forma oportuna de apresentar aos estudantes de graduação os conceitos centrais da disciplina.
Downloads
Referências
ARCHER, Renato. Renato Archer: diálogo com o tempo. Rio de Janeiro: CPDOC/FGV, 2007.
AVELAR, Alexandre de Sá. Traçando destinos: desafios narrativos e éticos da biografia histórica. Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, v.176, n. 466, p. 87-120. 2015.
BAENA SOARES, João Clemente. João Clemente Baena Soares: sem medo da diplomacia. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2006.
BARBOZA, Mario Gibson. Na diplomacia, o traço todo da vida (2a edição, revista e ampliada). Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 2002.
BERTAUX, Daniel. Introduction. In: Bertaux, Daniel. Biography and society. The life history approach in the social sciences. Los Angeles: SAGE, 1981. p. 5-15.
BESSNER, Daniel; GUILLHOT, Nicolas. How realism Waltzed Off: liberalism and decisionmaking in Kenneth Waltz’s neorealism. International Security, v.40, n. 2, p. 87-118. 2015.
BREITENBAUCH, H. O. e Wivel, A. Understanding national IR disciplines outside the United States: political culture and the construction of International Relations in Denmark. Journal of International Relations and Development, v.7, n. 4, p. 414-43. 2004.
CAMPOS, Roberto de Oliveira. A lanterna na popa: memórias. 2a edição revista. Rio de Janeiro: Topbooks, 1994.
CARR, Edward Hallett. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939; an introduction to the study of international relations. London,: Macmillan & co. ltd, 1946.
CHAMBERLAYNE, Prue, Bornat, Joanna, et al. Introduction: the biographical turn. In: CHAMBERLAYNE,
Prue, BORNAT, Joanna, et al. The turn to biographical methods in social science: comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge, 2000. p. 1-30.
CUNHA, Vasco Leitão da. Diplomacia em alto-mar: depoimento ao CPDOC. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2003.
DUROSELLE, Jean-Baptiste. Todo império perecerá. Brasília: Editora da Universidade de Brasília, 2000.
ELDER-VASS, Dave. The causal power of social structures: emergence, structure and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
FEBVRE, Lucien Paul Victor. Combats pour l’histoire. Paris: A. Colin, 1992 [1953].
FREYBERG-INAN, Annette. What moves man: the realist theory of international relations and its judgment of human nature. Albany: SUNY Press, 2004.
FRIEDRICHS, Jorg (Ed.). European approaches to international relations theory: a house with many mansions. New York: Routledge. 2004.
GEORGE, Alexander L.; GEORGE, Juliette L.; Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: a personality study: Courier Corporation, 1964.
GUENIFFEY, Patrice. Bonaparte: 1769-1802. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2015.
HERMANN, Margaret G; PRESTON, Thomas, et al. Who leads matters: the effects of powerful individuals. International Studies Review, v.3, n. 2, Summer, p. 83-131. 2001.
HOFFMANN, S. An American social science: international relations. v.106, n. 3, p. 41-60. 1977.
HUANG, X. The invisible hand: modern studies of international relations in Japan, China, and Korea. Journal of International Relations and Development, v.10, n. 2, p. 168-203. 2007.
HUDSON, Valerie M. Foreign policy analysis: classic and contemporary theory. Lanhan: Rowman & Littlefield
Publishers, 2007.
KOCHUYT, Thierry. Biographical and empiricistic illusions: a reply to recent criticism. In: MILLER, Robert. Biographical research methods. Volume IV. London: Sage, 2005. p. 126-9.
KOHLI, Martin. Biography: account, text, method. In: Miller, Robert. Biographical research methods. Volume IV. London: Sage, 2005. p. 59-71.
KRIPPNDORF, Ekkehart. The dominance of American approaches in international relations. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, v.16, n. 2, p. 207-14. 1987.
LAMPREIA, Luiz Felipe. O Brasil e os ventos do mundo. Rio de Janeiro: Objetiva, 2010.
LECKIE, Shirley A. Biography matters: why historians need well-crafted biographies more than ever. In: AMBROSIUS, Lloyd E. Writing biography: historians and their craft. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2004. p. 1-26.
LIMA, Oliveira. Dom João VI no Brasil. 3a. Rio de Janeiro: Topbooks, 1996.
LOBELL, Steven E., Ripsman, Norrin M., et al. Neoclassical realism, the state and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
MAIA, Emilio Joaquim da Silva. Elogio historico de José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva. Revista do Instituto Histórico e Geográfico Brasileiro, n. VIII, p. 116-43. 1846.
MEIZOZ, Jérôme. Avant-propos. In: Kaenel, Philippe, Meizoz, Jérôme, et al. La vie et l’ouvre? Recherches sur le biographique. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne, 2008. p. 3-8.
MERRILL, Barbara; WEST, Linden. Using biographical methods in social research. Los Angeles: Sage, 2009.
MORGENTHAU, Hans J. Politics among nations; the struggle for power and peace. 1st. New York: A. A. Knopf, 1948.
O’NEILL, Maggie, Roberts, Brian, et al. Introduction. In: O’neill, Maggie, Roberts, Brian, et al. Advances in biographical methods: creative applications. New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 1-7.
PEDREIRA, Jorge e Costa, Fernando Dores. D. João VI, o clemente. Lisboa: Temas e Debates, 2009.
PIKETTY, Guillaume. La biographie comme genre historique? Étude de cas. Vingtième Siècle, revue d’histoire, v.63, n. 1, p. 119-26. 1999.
PILLORGET, René. La biographie comme genre historique. Revue d’histoire diplomatique, v.96, n. 1, p. 5-42. 1982.
ROBERTS, Brian. Biographical research: past, present, future. In: O’NEILL, Maggie, ROBERTS, Brian, et al. Advances in biographical methods: creative applications. New York: Routledge, 2015. p. 11-29.
ROSE, Gideon. Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, v.51, n. 1, p. 144-72.1998.
ROSENAU, Pauline. Once again into the fray: international relations confronts the humanities. Millenium: Journal of International Studies, v.19, n. 1, p. 83-110. 1990.
ROSSET, François. La biographie a l’epreuve de l’ecriture. In: KAENEL, Philippe, MEIZOZ, Jérôme, et al. La vie et l’ouvre? Recherches sur le biographique. Lausanne: Université de Lausanne, 2008. p. 9-26.
RUSKIN, Michael. Reflections on the biographical turn in social science. In: CHAMBERLAYNE, Prue, BORNAT, Joanna, et al. The turn to biographical methods in social science: comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge, 2000. p. 33-52.
SCHROEDER, Paul W. The transformation of European politics: 1763-1848. Oxford: Carendon Press, 1994.
SPEKTOR, Matias (Ed.) Azeredo da Silveira: um depoimento. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV. 2010.
TEL´`O, Mario. International relations: a European perspective. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
VILLATTE, Laurent. La biographie en histoire des relations internationales. Revue d’histoire diplomatique, v.117, n. 4, p. 289-303. 2003.
WAEVERR, Ole. The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization, v.52, n. 04, p. 687-727. 1998.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1979.
WALTZ, Kenneth Neal. Man, the state and war: a theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001 [1959].
WENDT, Alexander. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, v.41, n. 3, p. 335-70. 1987.
WENGRAF, Tom, Chamberlayne, Prue, et al. A biographical turn in the social sciences? A British- European view. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, v.2, n. 2, p. 245-69. 2002.
