Eventos científicos: da Pirâmide Reputacional aos círculos persuasivos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202035020004Palavras-chave:
Eventos científicos, comunicação científica, comunidade científica, hierarquia, espacializaçãoResumo
O artigo aborda o tema dos eventos científicos. Argumenta que os eventos científicos constituem uma estratégia de comunicação que afeta a comunidade científica de forma social, espacial e cognitiva. O texto operacionaliza conceitos e teorias sociológicas como forma de analisar os eventos científicos. Para isso, baseia-se em pesquisa bibliográfica e histórica. Está dividido em cinco partes principais: i. uma introdução com a problematização sociológica dos eventos científicos; ii. uma análise do processo de formação e desenvolvimento dos eventos científicos; iii. uma revisão crítica da abordagem sociológica do Programa Normativo de análise da atividade científica; iv. uma revisão do Programa Discursivo dos eventos científicos; v. uma conclusão, que oferece subsídios para desenvolvimento da abordagem sociológica dos eventos científicos. O artigo conclui que os eventos científicos podem ser vistos como espaços que refletem a estratificação da comunidade científica, mas também como arenas de persuasão que são mobilizadas no processo de construção do conhecimento.
Downloads
Referências
ALEIXANDRE-BENAVENT, Rafael; GONZÁLEZ-ALCAIDE, Gregorio; MIGUEL-DASIT, Alberto; NAVARRO-MOLINA, Carolina; VALDERRAMA-ZURIÁN, Juan C. Full-text publications in peer-reviewed journals derived from presentations at three ISSI conferences. Scientometrics, v. 80, p. 407, 2009. [ Links ]
BEN-DAVID, Joseph. O papel do cientista na sociedade: um estudo comparativo. São Paulo: Editora Universidade de São Paulo, 1974. [ Links ]
BLOOR, David. Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 1976. [ Links ]
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Homo academicus. Florianópolis: Editora UFSC, 2011. [ Links ]
_____. Les usages sociaux de la science: pour une sociologie clinique du champ cientifique. Paris: Inra Editions, 2009. [ Links ]
_____. Science de la science et reflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’Agir Éditions, 2001. [ Links ]
_____. Le champ scientific. Actes de La recherché en Sciences Sociales, v. 2, n. 3, p. 88-104, 1976. [ Links ]
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. The First International Malaria Congress, v. 2, n. 3386, p. 970-971, 1925. [ Links ]
_____. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: LAW, J. (Org.). Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge?, p. 196-223. London: Routledge, 1986. [ Links ]
_____. Défense et illustration des recherches sur la science. In: JURDANT, B. (Org.). Impostures scientifiques, p. 253-267. Paris: La Découverte, 1998. [ Links ]
CALLON, Michel. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. in LAW, John (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986. [ Links ]
CARPI, Anthony; EGGER, Anne. The process of science. New Canaan (CT): Visionlearning, 2009. [ Links ]
CARTHER-THOMAS, Shirley; ROWLEY-JOVILET, Elizabeth. Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP), a methodological overview of multimodal genre. Asp La Revue du Groupe d’Études et de Recherches en Anglais de Spécialité (Geras), v. 39, p. 59-72, 2003. [ Links ]
COLE, Stephen. Merton’s contribution to the sociology of science. Social Studies of Science, v. 34, n. 6, p. 829-844, 2004. [ Links ]
COLLINS, Harry M.; PINCH, Trevor J. O Golem: o que você deveria saber sobre ciência. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2003. [ Links ]
DROTT, M. Carl. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 46, n. 4, p. 299-305, 1995. [ Links ]
EVERTS, Sarah. When science went international. Chemical & Engineering News, 2010. Disponível em: <https://pubs.acs.org/cen/science/88/8836sci1.html>. Consultado em: 08 Maio 2017. [ Links ]
FIXDAL, Jon. Consensus conferences as “extended peer groups”. Science and Public Policy, v. 24, n. 6, p. 366-376, 1997. [ Links ]
GARFIELD, Eugene. What is the primordial reference for the phrase “publish or perish”? The Scientist, v. 10, n. 12, p. 11, 1996. [ Links ]
GLÄNZEL, Wolfgang; DEBACKERE, Koenraad; THIJS, Bart; SCHUBERT, András. A concise review on the role of author self-citations in information science, bibliometrics and science policy. Scientometrics, v. 67, n. 2, p. 263-277, 2006. [ Links ]
GRIBBIN, John. The fellowship: Gilbert, Bacon, Wren, Newton, and the story of a scientific revolution. London: Penguin Books, 2007. [ Links ]
HAGSTROM, Warren. The scientific community. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1965. [ Links ]
HAYASHI, Maria C. P. I.; GUIMARÃES, Vera A. L. A comunicação da ciência em eventos científicos na visão de pesquisadores. Em Questão, v. 22, n. 3, p. 161-183, 2016. [ Links ]
HESSELS, Laurens K.; van LENTE, Harro. Re-thinking new knowledge production: a literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 4, p. 740-760, 2008. [ Links ]
HERMENEGILDO, Manuel V. Conferences vs. journals in CS, what to do? Evolutionary ways forward and the ICLP/TPLP Model. Position paper for Dagstuhl meeting 12452. Dagstuhl (DE): Publication Culture in Computing Research, 2012. [ Links ]
IHDE, Aaron. The Karlsruhe Congress: a centennial retrospect. Journal of Chemical Education, v. 38, n. 2, p. 83-86, 1961. [ Links ]
KELLY, Julia A. Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, v. 86, n. 1, p. 68-76, 1998. [ Links ]
KNORR-CETINA, Karen. The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press, 1981. [ Links ]
LATOUR, Bruno. Changer de societé, refaire de la sociologie. Paris: La Découverte, 2006. [ Links ]
_____. Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2000. [ Links ]
_____. The “pedofil” of Boa Vista: a photo-philosophical montage. Common Knowledge, v. 4, p.144-187, 1995. [ Links ]
LATOUR, Bruno; WOOLGAR, Steve. A vida de laboratório: a produção dos fatos científicos. Rio de Janeiro: Relume Dumará, 1997. [ Links ]
LAW, John. Actor network theory and material semiotics. In: TURNER, B. (Ed.). The New Blackwell companion to social theory. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing, 2009. [ Links ]
LISÉE, Cynthia; LARIVIÈRE, Vincent; ARCHAMBAULT, Éric. Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 11, p. 1776-1784, 2008. [ Links ]
LYNCH, Michael. Art and artifact in laboratory science: a study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London; Boston (MA): Routledge; Kegan Paul, 1985. [ Links ]
MARTINS, Waister S.; GONÇALES, Marcos A.; LAENDER, Alberto H .F.; ZIVIANI, Nivio. Assessing the quality of scientific conferences based on bibliographic citations, Scientometrics, v. 83, n. 1, p. 133-155, 2010. [ Links ]
MATTEDI, Marcos A. Dilemas da simetria entre contexto social e conhecimento: a redefinição das modalidades de abordagem sociológica do problema do conhecimento. Política & Sociedade, v. 3, n. 4, p. 41-79, 2004. [ Links ]
MATTEDI, Marcos A.; SPIESS, Maiko R. A avaliação da produtividade científica. História, Ciência, Saúde - Manguinhos, v. 24, n. 3, p. 623-643, 2017. [ Links ]
_____. Modalidades de regulação da comunidade científica: uma comparação entre as interpretações normativa, cognitiva e transacional dos processos de integração da comunidade científica. Educação & Sociedade, v. 31, n. 110, p. 73-111, 2010. [ Links ]
MEADOWS, A. J. A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet Lemos Livros, 1999. [ Links ]
MERTON, Robert K. A ambivalência sociológica e outros ensaios. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1979. [ Links ]
_____. Sociologia: teoria e estrutura. São Paulo: Mestre Jou, 1970. [ Links ]
_____. The Matthew effect in science. Science, v. 159, n. 3810, p. 56-63, 1968. [ Links ]
_____. Priority in scientific discovery. American Sociological Review, v. 22, n. 6, p. 635-659, 1957. [ Links ]
MICHELS, Carolin; FU, Jun-Ying. Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of science. Scientometrics, v. 100, n. 2, p. 307-327, 2014. [ Links ]
MOMM, Christiane F. Conhecimento científico e território: as dimensões espaciais do Enanpur (Anpur) no Brasil, 1986-2013. Tese (Doutorado em Desenvolvimento Regional) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento Regional, Universidade Regional de Blumenau, 2017. [ Links ]
NYE, Mary. Introduction. In: NYE, M. J. (Org.). The question of the atom: from the Karlsruhe Congress to the First Solvay Conference, 1860-1911. Los Angeles (CA): Tomash Publishers, 1984. [ Links ]
POWELL, Walter W. Getting into Print: the decision making process in scholarly publishing. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 1985. [ Links ]
PRICE, Derek John de Solla. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963. [ Links ]
ROWLEY-JOLIVET, Elizabeth. ROWLY-JOLIVET, Elizabeth. The pivotal role of conference papers in the network of scientific communication. ASp [Online], v. 23, p. 179-196, 2011. [ Links ]
_____. The pivotal role of conference papers in the network of scientific communication. Asp La Revue du Groupe d’Études et de Recherches en Anglais de Spécialité (Geras), v. 23, p. 179-196, 1999. [ Links ]
SHAPIN, Steven. The politics of observation: cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes. The Sociological Review, V. 27, S1, p. 139-178, 1979. [ Links ]
SHAPIN, Steven; SCHAFFER, Simon. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 1985. [ Links ]
SILVEIRA, Murilo Artur Araújo da; BUFREM, Leilah Santiago; CAREGNATO, Sônia Elisa. Os eventos científicos, as relações de poder e as práticas dos pesquisadores. Transinformação, v. 27, n. 3, p. 199-208, 2015. [ Links ]
SÖDERQVIST, Thomas; SILVERSTEIN, Arthur M. Studying leadership and subdisciplinary structure of scientific disciplines. Scientometrics, v. 30, n. 1, p. 243-258, 1994. [ Links ]
STAFLEU, Frans. A century of botanical congresses. In: STARR, R. C. (Ed.). XI International Botanical Congress. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle, August 24-September 2, 1969. Proceedings, Washington (DC), XI International Botanical Congress, 1970. [ Links ]
TRAVIS, David; COLLINS, Harry M. New light on old boys: cognitive and institutional particularism in the peer review system. Science, Technology and Human Values, v. 16, n. 3, p. 322-341, 1991. [ Links ]
VARDI, Moshe Y. Conferences vs. journals in computing research. Communications of the ACM, v. 52, n. 5, p. 5, 2009. [ Links ]
VENTOLA, Eija; SHALOM, Celia; THOMPSON, Susan. The language of conferencing. New York: Peter Lang, 2002. [ Links ]
WEBSTER, Charles. New light on the invisible college the social relations of English science in the mid-seventeenth Century. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, v. 24, p. 19-42, 1974. [ Links ]
WILKINSON, Sarah E.; BASTO, Marnique Y.; PEROVIC, Greta; LAWRENTSCHUK, Nathan; MURPHY, Declan G. The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings. BJU International, v. 115, n. 5, p. 839-846, 2015. [ Links ]
ZIMAN, John. Real science: what it is and what it means. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2000. [ Links ]
_____. Postacademic science: constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Science Studies, v. 9, n. 1, p. 67-80, 1996. [ Links ]
ZUSMAN, Edie E. Restructuring of multidisciplinary scientific meetings improves valuable exchange of information. Neurosurgery, v. 69, n. 4, p. N16-N18, 2011. [ Links ]
.jpg)
