COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPRIETARY AND FREE PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF FEM STATIC SIMULATION

Autores

  • Guilherme Celeghini Ferreira Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
  • Marilia Mansur Ferreira de Resende Chaves
  • Jánes Landre Junior

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/ripe.v2i23.21044

Palavras-chave:

Finite element. Free software. Proprietary software.

Resumo

Programs that utilize the finite element method (FEM) have as purpose the virtual analysis of real problems, and there is a search for those with better results reliability at lower cost. Hence, the comparison between free and proprietary FEM platforms was proposed, using data from an experimental test to feed the analysis and compare it with the numerical results. It has been noted that in the studied point the variations in relation to experimental data were below 15% and under 6% in comparison to analytical data. Consequently, as to the accuracy of static analysis results, it was possible to verify that free programs have similar reliability as proprietary ones.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ASM International, 2005. ASM Handbook Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys, Vol. 1, 1618 p.

Barkanov, E., 2001. Introduction to the Finite Element Method, Institute of materials and structures, Faculty of civil engineering, Riga, 70 p.

Beer, F. P., Johnston, E. R., & DeWolf, J. T., 2009. Pure bending. In: Beer F. P., Johnston E. R., DeWolf J. T. Mechanics of Materials. Ed. 5. London: McGraw-Hill, pp. 208-306.

Brito, Antônio Carlos de Sousa, 2011. O software livre gráfico na arquitetura: uma experiencia de avaliação. Dissertation, Universidade Federal da Bahia.

CSC - IT Center for Science, 2016 Elmer, Available at , Accessed in 11 July 2016.

Dhondt, G. & Wittig, K., 2016. CalculiX: A Three-Dimensional Structural Finite Element Program, Available at , Accessed in 11 July 2016.

Felippa, C., 2004. Introduction to Finite Element Method, Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences and Center for Aerospace Structures, University of Colorado, Boulder, EUA.

Gaff, B. M. & Ploussios, G. J., 2012. Open Source Software, Computing and the Law, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 9-11

Galeano, C., Mantilla, J., Duque C. & Mejía, M., 2007. Herramientas de Software con Licencia Pública General para el Modelado por Elementos Finitos, DYNA ”“ J. of the Facultad de Minas, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Vol. 153, Medellin, Colombia, pp. 313-324.

Hughes, T. J. R., 2000. The finite element method: Linear static and dynamic finite element analysis, Dover Publications INC, Mineola, Nova York.

Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008. JCGM 100:2008: Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement, Ed. 1.

Lotti, R. S. Machado, A. W., Mazzieiro, E. T., & Landre Jr, J., 2006. Aplicabilidade científica do método dos elementos finitos, Revista Dental Press Ortodontia e Ortopedia Facial, Maringá, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 35-43.

Rao, S. S., 2004. The Finite Element Method in Engineering, 4 ed, Ed. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Miami, 663 p.

Rieg, F., 2015. Z88Aurora: Theory manual, V. 3, 183 p.

Rolandsson, B., Bergquist, M. &Ljungberg, J., 2010. Open Source in the Firm: Opening up Professional Practices of Software Development, Research Policy, Elsevier, pp. 576-587.

Salles Filho, S., De Lucca, J. E., Stefanuto, G. N., & Alves, A. M. 2005. O impacto Software Livre e de Código Aberto (SL/CA) nas Condições de Apropriabilidade na Indústria de Software Brasileira. XI Seminário Latino-Iberoamericana de Gestión Tecnológica.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-02-08

Como Citar

Ferreira, G. C., Chaves, M. M. F. de R., & Landre Junior, J. (2017). COMPARISON BETWEEN PROPRIETARY AND FREE PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF FEM STATIC SIMULATION. Revista Interdisciplinar De Pesquisa Em Engenharia, 2(23), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.26512/ripe.v2i23.21044

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)