DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-COST WIRELESS ACCELEROMETER FOR STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC MONITORING

Autores

  • Emerson Galdino
  • Alexandre Cury

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/ripe.v2i25.20839

Palavras-chave:

Wireless accelerometer. Low-cost. SHM. Modal Analysis.

Resumo

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) of civil infrastructures has great practical importance for engineers. Several researches have been carried out, such as the Rio-Niterói Bridge in Brazil, the former Z24 Bridge in Switzerland, the Millau Bridge in France, among others. In fact, some structures are monitored 24/7 to supply dynamic measurements that can be used for the identification of structural problems, such as the presence of cracks, excessive vibration, damage identification or even to perform life cycle analyses. SHM systems may provide automated assessments of structural health by processing data from sensors attached to the structure. SHM often uses wired systems, which are usually expensive due to the necessity of continuous maintenance and are not always suitable for sensing remote structures. On the other hand, commercial wireless systems often demand high implementation costs. In this sense, this paper proposes the development of a sensing system that uses an open-source prototyping platform (Arduino), which significantly reduces implementation costs while keeping data’s integrity. The wireless communication is performed in real time through a local wireless network, responsible for sending and receiving data. The proposed system is validated by comparing its results with a commercial wired system through an experimental application performed in laboratory.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Arduino, 2016a. https://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardDue.

Arduino, 2016b. https://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoWirelessShield.

Arduino, 2016c. https://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/Software.

Battista, R., & Pfeil, M., 2000. Reduction of vortex-induced oscillations of Rio-Niterói Bridge by dynamic control devices. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 84, n. 3, pp. 273”“288.

Cardini, A.J., & DeWolf, J.T., 2009. Long-term Structural Health Monitoring of a Multi-Girder Steel Composite Bridge Using Strain Data. Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 8, n. 1, pp. 47-58.

Cury, A., Borges, C.C.H., & Barbosa, F.S., 2010. A two-step technique for damage assessment using numerical and experimental vibration data. Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 10, n. 4, pp. 417-428.

Darus, I.Z.M., & Tokhi, M.O., 2005. Soft computing-based active vibration control of a flexible structure. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 18, n. 1, pp. 93-114.

Digi International, Inc., 2016a. XBee & XBee-PRO ZB Product Specification.

Digi International, Inc., 2016b. http://www.digi.com/products/xbee-rf-solutions/xctu-software/xctu.

Gautier, Y., Moretti, O., & Cremona, C., 2005. Experimental modal analysis of the Millau Bridge. Proceedings of Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures.

InvenSense Inc., 2013. MPU-6000/MPU-6050 Product Specification, PS-MPU-6000A-00 Datasheet, revision 3,4.

Lu, Z.R., & Law, S.S., 2009. Dynamic condition assessment of a cracked beam with the composite element model. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 23, n. 2, pp. 415-431.

MathWorks, 2012. www.mathworks.com/hardware-support/arduino-matlab.html

Pandey, S., Haider, M., & Uddin, N., 2016. Design and Implementation of a Low-Cost Wireless Platform for Remote Bridge Health Monitoring. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, vol. 6, n. 6, pp. 57-62.

Reynders, E., & De Roeck, G., 2009. Continuous vibration monitoring and progressive damage testing on the Z24 bridge. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoring, pp. 2149-2158.

Sindhu, S.A., & Nirrmala, C.A., 2015. Structural Health Monitoring Using Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Computer Science & Electronics, vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 319-322.

Soyoz, S., & Feng, M.Q., 2009. Long-Term Monitoring and Identification of Bridge Structural Parameters. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, vol. 24, n. 2, pp. 82-92.

Torres, M.A., & Ruiz, S.E., 2007. Structural reliability evaluation considering capacity degradation over time. Engineering Structures, vol. 29, n. 9, pp. 2183-2192.

Xu, N., Rangwala, S., Chintalapudi, K., Ganesan, D., Broad, A., Govindan, R., & Estrin, D., 2004. A Wireless Sensor Network for Structural Monitoring. Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 13-24.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-02-10

Como Citar

Galdino, E., & Cury, A. (2017). DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-COST WIRELESS ACCELEROMETER FOR STRUCTURAL DYNAMIC MONITORING. Revista Interdisciplinar De Pesquisa Em Engenharia, 2(25), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.26512/ripe.v2i25.20839