The Regulatory Framework for distance learning undergraduate courses in Brazil

An analysis from the perspective of Responsive Regulation Theory

Authors

Keywords:

Education. Higher education. Distance education. Responsive regulation. Regulatory framework.

Abstract

[Purpose] The purpose of this article is to analyze the regulatory framework for distance learning in the light of the concepts of Responsive Regulation Theory. It analyzes the main similarities and differences between the regulatory frameworks for distance education, as well as the main absences identified with regard to responsive regulatory modeling.

[Methodology/approach/design] From the perspective of Responsive Regulation Theory, the main changes proposed by the new regulatory framework for distance learning are analyzed, in order to compare the regulatory modeling adopted under Decree No. 9,057/2017 - the current regulatory framework for distance learning - and under the proposed new regulatory framework for distance learning.

[Findings] The new regulatory framework for distance education differs from the current regulatory framework - 2017 - by imposing new specific criteria for the provision of distance education undergraduate courses. Both are similar from a regulatory point of view because they adopted regulatory techniques based on the logic of command and control and the logic of extrinsic incentives. As for the Theory of Responsive Regulation, the new regulatory framework does not adopt its modeling or even techniques based on it.

[Originality/value] The article deals with an issue that has a major impact on private higher education institutions in Brazil, since they account for 95.8% of distance learning enrollments in the country. Therefore, an article on the recent modification of the regulatory framework for undergraduate distance learning courses is important for the practice of the educational sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Elisa Amorim Boaventura, UnB

Elisa Amorim Boaventura é advogada, graduada pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB) e mestranda em direito na linha de pesquisa Transformações na Ordem Social e Econômica e Regulação pela mesma instituição. É pós-graduanda em direito internacional com ênfase em comércio internacional pela USP – Ribeirão Preto. É membro do Centro de Estudos Constitucionais Comparados (CECC - UnB), membro do Grupo de Estudos em Teoria da Regulação (GEREG – UnB) e editora Associada do International Review of Constitutional Reform (IRCR). E-mail: elisaamorimb@gmail.com.

References

ARANHA, M. I. Manual de Direito Regulatório: Fundamentos de Direito Regulatório. 9ª. ed. Londres: Laccademia Publishing, 2024.

ARANHA, M. I.; LOPES, D. A. O. Estudo sobre Teorias Jurídicas da Regulação apoiadas em incentivos. Centro de Políticas, Direito, Economia e Tecnologias das Comunicações - FD/UnB. Brasília, p. 294. 2019.

ARRUDA, E. P. Políticas públicas em EaD no Brasil: marcas da técnica e lacunas educacionais. Inclusão Social, v. 10, n. 1, 2018. 105-118. Disponivel em: <https://revista.ibict.br/inclusao/article/view/4175>.

ARRUDA, E. P.; ARRUDA, D. E. P. Educação a distância no Brasil: políticas públicas e democratização do acesso ao ensino superior. Educação em Revista, Belo Horizonte, v. 31, n. 3, julho-setembro 2015. 321-338. Disponivel em: <https://www.scielo.br/j/edur/a/L8pKJVB44tLnp5rTzNB3SvC/>.

BALDWIN, R.; BLACK, J. Really Responsive Regulation. The Modern Law Review, Oxford, 71, 2008. 59-94. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1033322.

BRAITHWAITE, J. To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.

BRAITHWAITE, J.; AYRES, I. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 1992.

BRAITHWAIVE, J. The essence of responsive regulation. UBC Law Review, 44, 2011. 475-520. Disponível em: https://johnbraithwaite.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/essence_responsive_regulation.pdf.

CABRAL, R. D. C. A Política Regulatória da Educação Superior no Brasil: O desafio da expansão com garantia de qualidade, Brasília, 2021. Disponível em: http://www.rlbea.unb.br/jspui/bitstream/10482/41814/1/2021_RodolfodeCarvalhoCabral.pdf.

INSTITUTO SEMESP. Mapa do Ensino Superior no Brasil - 2024. 14ª. ed. São Paulo: Semesp, 2024.

MOORE, M.; KEARSLEY, G. Distance Education: a systems view. 2ª. ed. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005.

NIKLASSON, L. Game-like Regulation of Universities: Will the New Regulatory Framework for Higher Education in Sweden Work? Higher Education, 32, n. 3, Outubro 1996. 267-282. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3448072.

REUNI DIGITAL. Diagnóstico e desafios para a expansão da EaD no Brasil. Ministério da Educação e Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos. Brasília, v. 3, p. 94. 2022. (Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mec/pt-br/reunidigital/pdf/REUNIDIGITALVol3_Diagnosticos_e_desafios_expansao_EaD_Brasil.pdf).

REUNI DIGITAL. Panorama da EaD no Brasil. Ministério da Educação e Centro de Gestão e Estudos. Brasília, v. 2, p. 186. 2022. (Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/mec/pt-br/reunidigital/pdf/REUNIDIGITALVol2_Panorama_EaD_Brasil.pdf).

SEIXAS, L. F. M.; SACCARO JUNIOR, N. L. Quem faz análise de impacto regulatório no Brasil? Uma avaliação da experiência federal. 1ª. ed. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea), 2024.

SISTEMA NACIONAL DE AVALIAÇÃO DA EDUCAÇÃO SUPERIOR - SINAES. Roteiro de Auto Avaliação Institucional: Orientações Gerais. Brasília: Inep - MEC, 2004. Disponível em: https://download.inep.gov.br/publicacoes/institucionais/avaliacoes_e_exames_da_educacao_superior/roteiro_de_auto_avaliacao_institucional_2004.pdf

Published

2025-10-09

How to Cite

AMORIM BOAVENTURA, Elisa. The Regulatory Framework for distance learning undergraduate courses in Brazil: An analysis from the perspective of Responsive Regulation Theory. Journal of Law and Regulation, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 2, p. 102–125, 2025. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rdsr/article/view/57242. Acesso em: 5 dec. 2025.