CORRESPONDENCE THEORIES OOF TRUTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/pl.v9i18.29581Keywords:
Correspondence Theories of Truth. Alethic Realism. Bertrand Russell. John Austin.Abstract
The aim of this paper is to discuss two versions and some main problems concerning the correspondence theories of truth (CR). We wish here to focus primarily at the fact-based contemporary versions of CRs. In this area, there’s still a bifurcation concerning the two main variations of the CRs. The first of them gives an account of the correspondence relation in terms of congruence, the second, in terms of correlation. We’ll thus try to articulate the specificities of each one as portraited in Russell’s and Austin’s versions of correspondence theories, which are taken as paradigmatically representing this distinction, respectively. Our final goal is also to discuss some implications and objections often raised to CRs and its theorists.
Downloads
References
ALSTON, William. P. A Realist Conception of Truth. In: LYNCH, Michael. (Ed.). The Nature of Truth: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. p. 41”“66.
ARISTÓTELES. Metafísica. Traducao Giovanni Reale; Marcelo Perine. 2. ed. São Paulo: Edições Loyola, 2005.
AUSTIN, John. L. Truth. In: LYNCH, Michael. (Ed.). The Nature of Truth: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. p. 25”“40.
AUSTIN, John. L.; STRAWSON, P. F.; COUSIN, D. R. Truth. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, Londres, v. 24, n. 1, 1950, p. 111”“172, Julho
BALDWIN, Thomas. Truth in British Idealism and its Analytic Critics. In: GLANZBERG, Michael. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 125”“149.
CARNAP, Rudolf. Über Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis, Dordrecht, v. 3, n. 1, 1932, p. 215”“228, Dezembro
CRARY, Alice. The happy truth: J.L. Austin’s how to do things with words. Inquiry, Oslo, v. 45, n. 1, 2002, p. 59”“80, Março
DAVID, Marian. The Correspondence Theory of Truth. In: GLANZBERG, Michael. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 238-258
DAVIDSON, Donald. The Structure and Content of Truth. The Journal of Philosophy, Nova Iorque, v. 87, n. 6, 1990, p. 279”“328, Junho.
GIAROLO, Kariel. A. A Crítica De Frege a Teoria Da Verdade Como Correspondência. Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia, v. 18, n. 2, 2013, p. 135”“166, Jul-Dez
HAACK, Susan. Filosofia das lógicas. Traducao Cezar Augusto Mortari; Luis Henrique de Araújo Dutra. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2002.
HORWICH, Paul. Truth. 2. ed. Oxford, UK; Cambridge, Mass. USA: Basil Blackwell, 1999.
JOHNSTON, Colin.; SULLIVAN, Paul. Judgements, facts and propositions: theories of truth in Russell, Wittgenstein and Ramsey. In: GLANZBERG, Michael. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. p 150-192
KIRKHAM, Richard. Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction. Massachussetts: MIT Press, 1992.
KÜNNE, Wolfgang. Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
LYNCH, Michael. The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
MOORE, George. E. Some Main Problems of Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge, 2013. v. 53
NEURATH, Otto. Protocol Statements. In: COHEN, Robert. (Ed.). Philosophical Papers 1913-1946. Dordrecht, Holland; Boston: D. Riedel Pub. Co, 1948. p. 91”“99.
NEWMAN, Andrew. The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
PEREIRA, R. M. A Concepção da Verdade-como-Correspondência. Anais do VII Seminário de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da UFSCar (2011). Anais. São Carlos: 2012. p. 374-384
PUTNAM, Hilary. Two Philosophical Perspectives. In: LYNCH, Michael. (Ed.). The Nature of Truth: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. p. 251-258
RUSSELL, Bertrand. On The Nature of Truth and Falsehood. In: RUSSELL, Bertrand. Philosophical Essays. London: Longmand & Co., 1910. p. 170”“185.
RUSSELL, Bertrand. Truth and Falsehood. In: LYNCH, Michael. (Ed.). The Nature of Truth: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001. p. 17”“24.
RUSSELL, Bertrand. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
SEARLE, John. Truth: a Reconsideration of Strawson’s view. In: HAHN, Lewis. E. (Ed.). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court, 1998. p. 385”“401.
SIMÕES, Eduardo. A CLASSIFICAÇÃO DOS PROJETOS E TEORIAS DA VERDADE E O LUGAR DA TEORIA DA CORRESPONDÊNCIA E DO PRAGMATISMO. Revista Perspectivas, Palmas, v. 2, n. 2, 2017, p.19-38, Novembro
STRAWSON, Paul. F. Reply to John Searle. In: HAHN, Lewis. (Ed.). The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson. Chicago: Open Court, 1998. p. 402”“404.
WALKER, Richard. The Coherence Theory of Truth. In: GLANZBERG, Michael. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018. p. 219”“237.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Traducao Luiz Henrique Lopes Dos Santos. 3. ed. São Paulo: Edusp, 2017.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 PÓLEMOS ”“ Revista de Estudantes de Filosofia da Universidade de Brasília
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Todos os trabalhos que forem aceitos para publicação, após o devido processo avaliativo, serão publicados sob uma licença Creative Commons, na modalidade Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Esta licença permite que qualquer pessoa copie e distribua a obra total e derivadas criadas a partir dela, desde que seja dado crédito (atribuição) ao autor / Ã autora / aos autores / às autoras.
