Os estudos culturais na encruzilhada dos feminismos materiais e descoloniais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/2316-4018444Resumen
Neste artigo, refaço a trajetória dos debates nos estudos culturais feministas, principalmente nos Estados Unidos, tendo como foco três tipos de abordagem em relação à s dicotomias realidade/representação e texto/contexto. Como apreender a materialidade do mundo sem abrir mão do fato de que nossas narrativas/representações são sempre constitutivas desse mundo? Argumento que vejo ecos do que as feministas materiais defendem nas propostas cosmopolíticas latino-americanas para um feminismo descolonial. Alego que a articulação desses dois projetos (um advindo dos debates no Norte e o outro do Sul) pode servir de inspiração para repensarmos ”“ e descolonizarmos ”“ as práticas dos estudos culturais na América Latina.
Descargas
Citas
ANZALDÚA, Gloria (2009). Metaphors in the tradition of the Shaman. In: KEATING, Ana Louise (Ed.). The Gloria Anzaldúa reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
APPADURAI, Arjun (1996). Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
BANNER, Olivia P. (2009). Book Review. Signs, v. 34, n. 3, p. 713-717.
BARAD, Karen (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, v. 28, n. 3, p. 801-831.
BENHABIB, Seyla (1995). Subjectivity, historiography, and politics: reflections on the feminism/postmodernism exchange. In: BENHABIB, Seyla et al. (Eds.). Feminist contentions: a philosophical exchange. New York: Routledge.
BEST, Steven; KELLNER, Douglas (1991). Postmodern theory: critical interrogations. New York: The Guilford Press.
BORDO, Susan (1990). Feminism, postmodernism, and gender-skepticism. In: NICHOLSON, Linda (Ed.). Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
BORDO, Susan (1992). Postmodern subjects, postmodern bodies. Review Essay. Feminist Studies, v. 18, n. 1, p. 159-175.
BRUNDSON, Charlotte (1996). A thief in the night: stories of feminism in the 1970s at CCCS. In: MORLEY, David; KUAN-HSING, Chen (Eds.). Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
BUTLER, Judith (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.
CARDOSO, Claudia Pons (2012). Outras falas: feminismos na perspectiva de mulheres negras brasileiras. Tese (Doutorado) ”“ Programa de Pós-Graduação em Estudos de Gênero, Mulher e Feminismo, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador.
COSTA, Claudia de Lima; ÁVILA, Eliana (2005). Gloria Anzaldúa, a consciência mestiça e o “feminismo da diferença”. Revista Estudos Feministas, v. 13, n. 3, p. 691-703.
DAVIES, Ioan (1995). Cultural studies and beyond: fragments of empire. New York: Routledge.
DE LA CADENA, Marisol (2010). Indigenous cosmopolitics in the Andes: conceptual reflections beyond „politics”Ÿ. Cultural Anthropology, v. 25, n. 2, p. 334-370.
EBERT, Teresa (1996). Ludic feminism and after: postmodernism, desire, and labor in late capitalism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
EVARISTO, Conceição (2006). Becos da memória. Belo Horizonte: Mazza.
FLAX, Jane (1990). Thinking fragments: psychoanalysis, feminism, postmodernism in the contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
FRASER, Nancy; NICHOLSON, Linda (1988). Social criticism without philosophy: an encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In: ROSS, Andrew (Ed.). Universal abandon? The politics of postmodernism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
FURMAN, Nelly (1985). The politics of language: beyond the gender principle? In: GREENE, Gayle; KHAN, Coppelia (Eds.). Making a difference: feminist literary criticism. New York: Methuen.
GROSSBERG, Lawrence (1992). We gotta get out of this place: popular conservatism and postmodern culture. New York: Routledge.
GROSSBERG, Lawrence (1997a). Bringing it all back home: essays on cultural studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
GROSSBERG, Lawrence (1997b). Cultural studies, modern logics, and theories of globalization. In: McROBBIE, Angela (Ed.). Back to reality? Social experience and cultural studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
GUGELBERGER, Georg M. (Ed.) (1996). The real thing: testimonial discourse and Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press.
HALL, Stuart (1990). The emergence of cultural studies and the crisis of the humanities. October, v. 53, p. 11-23.
HAMES-GARCÃA, Michael (2008). How real is race? In: ALAIMO, Stacy; HEKMAN, Susan (Eds.). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
HARAWAY, Donna (2003). The companion species manifesto: dogs, people, and significant others. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
HARTSOCK, Nancy (1990). Postmodernism and political change: issues for feminist theory. Cultural Critique, v. 14, p. 15-33.
HEKMAN, Susan (2008). Constructing the ballast: an ontology for feminism. In: ALAIMO, ALAIMO, Stacy; HEKMAN, Susan (Eds.). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
HEMMINGS, Claire (2005). Invoking affect: cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies, v. 19, n. 5, p. 548-567.
HENNESSY, Rosemary; INGRAHAM, Chris (1997). Introduction. In: ______ (Eds). Materialist feminism: a reader in class, difference, and women”Ÿs lives. New York: Routledge.
HOOKS, bell (1990). Yearning: race, gender, and cultural politics. Boston: South End Press.
JESUS, Maria Carolina de (2010). Quarto de despejo: diário de uma favelada. 9. ed. São Paulo: Ática.
KEATING, Ana Louise (Ed.) (2009). The Gloria Anzaldúa reader. Durham: Duke University Press.
KUAN-HSING, Chen (1996). Post-marxism: between/beyond critical postmodernism and cultural studies. In: MORLEY, David; KUAN-HSING, Chen (Eds.). Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
LONG, Elizabeth (1996). Feminism and cultural studies. In: STOREY, John (Ed.). What is cultural studies? New York: Arnold.
MASSUMI, Brian (2002). Parables for the virtual: movement, affect, sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
McROBBIE, Angela (1997). Introduction. In: ______ (Ed.). Back to reality? Social experience and cultural studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
MIGNOLO, Walter (1998). Interview: a cultural studies questionnaire. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, v. 7, n. 1, p. 111-119.
MIGNOLO, Walter (2012). Decolonizing Western epistemology/building decolonial epistemologies. In: ISASI-DÃAZ, Ada María; MENDIETA, Eduardo (Eds.). Decolonizing epistemologies: Latina/o theology and philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press.
MILLÁN, Márgara (2011). Feminismos, postcolonialidad, descolonización: ¿Del centro a los márgenes? Andamios, v. 8, n. 17, p. 11-36.
MORAGA, Cherrie; ANZALDÚA, Gloria E. (1983). This bridge called my back. New York: Kitchen Table Women of Color Press.
MOREIRAS, Alberto (2001). The exhaustion of difference: the politics of Latin American cultural studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
MORLEY, David; KUAN-HSING, Chen (Eds.) (1996). Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies. New York: Routledge.
MORRIS, Meaghan (1997). A question of cultural studies. In: McROBBIE, Angela (Ed.). Back to reality? Social experience and cultural studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
ROONEY, Ellen (1996). Discipline and vanish: feminism, the resistance to theory, and the politics of cultural studies. In: STOREY, John (Ed.). What is cultural studies? New York: Arnold.
STENGERS, Isabelle (2005). The cosmopolitical proposal. In: LATOUR, Bruno; WEIBEL, Peter (Eds.). Making things public: atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
THRIFT, Nigel (2007). Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect. New York: Routledge.
VISWESWARAN, Kamala (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
WEED, Elizabeth (1989). Introduction: terms of reference. In: WEED, Elizabeth (Ed.). Coming to terms: feminism, theory, politics. New York: Routledge.
YOUNG, Robert J. C. (1996). Torn halves: political conflict in literary and cultural theory. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Los autores que publican en esta revista concuerdan con los siguientes términos:
a) Los (los) autores (s) conservan los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, siendo el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo la Licencia Creative Commons de Atribución-No Comercial 4.0, lo que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y publicación inicial en esta revista.
b) Los autores (a) tienen autorización para asumir contratos adicionales por separado, para distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, publicar en repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y reconocimiento publicación inicial en esta revista.
c) Los autores tienen permiso y se les anima a publicar y distribuir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su página personal) después del proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar cambios productivos, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado (ver el efecto del acceso libre).
d) Los (as) autores (as) de los trabajos aprobados autorizan la revista a, después de la publicación, ceder su contenido para reproducción en indexadores de contenido, bibliotecas virtuales y similares.
e) Los (as) autores (as) asumen que los textos sometidos a la publicación son de su creación original, responsabilizándose enteramente por su contenido en caso de eventual impugnación por parte de terceros.
