La innovación genérica en Lacedaimonion Politeia revisitada

Noreen Humble

doi:10.14195/1984-249X_31_10

Autores

Noreen Humble University of Calgary https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8612-946X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_31_10

Palavras-chave:

Jenofonte, Lacedaimonion Politeia, Esparta, género, politeia, asombro, horizonte de expectativas

Resumo

Este artículo analiza la estructura genérica y los fundamentos de la Lacedaimonion Politeiade Jenofonte. La Lac. ha sido frecuentemente considerada como un elogio o defensa de Esparta. Sin embargo, su retórica y estructura narrativa tienen poca similitud con prácticas contemporáneas para la composición de encomios o defensas. Aun cuando esto no impide un motivo elogioso o defensivo, examinar el tipo de retórica y los patrones narrativos de Jenofonte revela distintas afiliaciones genéricas, mostrando que la Lac., al igual que muchos otros escritos de Jenofonte, es un trabajo híbrido con características de la literaturade politeiaiy de la investigación filosófica. En efecto, una cuidadosa pesquisa, en particular, de la manera en que Jenofonte utiliza interlocutores imaginarios (característica compartida por ambos tipos de escritura) sugiere que el encomio no puede haber sido el objetivo de este tratado.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AZOULAY, V. (2007). Sparte et la Cyropédie. Ktema 32.p. 435-456.

BANDINI, M.; DORION, L.-A. (eds.)(2003). Xénophon. Mémorables. Tome 1. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

BODIN, L. (ed. P. Demont) (1975). Lire le Protagoras: introduction à la méthode dialectique de Protagoras.Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

BORDES, J. (1982). Politeia dans la pensée grecque jusqu'à Aristote. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

BRADLEY, P. J. (2001). Irony and Narrator in Xenophon's Anabasis. En: TYLAWSKY, E. I.; WEISS, C. G. (eds.). Essays in Honour of Gordon Williams. New Haven. p. 59-84. (También en: GRAY, V. (ed.) (2010). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Xenophon. Oxford, Oxford University Press. p. 520-552.)

BREITENBACH, H. R. (1966). Xenophon von Athen. Stuttgart, Alfred Druckenmüller (= RE ixa/2, p. 1569-2051).

CARTLEDGE, P. (1987). Agesilaos and the Crisis of Sparta. London, Duckworth.

CHRIMES, K.M.T. (1948). The Respublica Lacedaemoniorum ascribed to Xenophon. Manchester, Manchester University Press.

CLAY, D. (1992). Plato's first words. En: DUNN, F. M.; COLE, T. (eds.). Beginnings in Classical Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.p. 113-130.

COSKUN, A. (2012). Pseudo-Xenophon: Ein "Alter Oligarch"? Die Athenaion politeiaauf dem Prüfstand. En: LEHMANN, G.-A.; ENGSTER, D.; NUß, A. (eds.). Von derbronzezeitlichen Geschichte zur modernen Antikenrezeption. Göttingen, Universitätsverlag.p. 55-81.

CONNOR, W. R. (1985). Historical writing in the fourth century B.C. and the Hellenistic period. En: EASTERLING, P.; KNOX, B. M. W. (eds.). Greek Literature. Cambridge Histories Online. Cambridge University Press.

CUNIBERTI, G. (2007). Per chi scrive senofonte? Il ruolo di Lacedemoni nella produzione e ricezione delle opere di Senofonte. Ktema32.p. 379-390.

D'ALESSANDRO, G. (ed.) (2009). Senofonte. Costituzione degli Spartani-Agesilao. Milan, Mondadori.

DANZIG, G.; JOHNSON, D.; MORRISON, D. (eds.) (2018). Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies. Leiden, Brill.

DAVID, E. (2007). Xénophon et le mythe de Lycurgue. Ktema32.p. 297-310.

DIELS, H.; Kranz, W. (1952). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Vol. 2. Berlin, Weidmann.DILLERY, J. (2018). Initial in Isocrates, Xenophon and related texts. En: TAMIOLAKI, M. (ed.). Xenophon and Isocrates. Political Affinities and Literary Interactions. Special issue of Trends in Classics10.1.p. 77-100.

DORION, L.-A. (2003). Introduction générale. En: BANDINI, M.; DORION, L.-A. (eds.). Xénophon. Mémorables. Tome 1. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.p. vii-cclii.

DUCAT, J. (2006). Spartan Education: Youth and Society in the Classical Period. Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.

DUNN, F. M.; COLE, T. (eds.) (1992). Beginnings in Classical Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

DUFF, D. (ed.) (2000). ModernGenre Theory. Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd.

ERBSE, H. (1961). Die Architektonik im Aufbau von Xenophons Memorabilien. Hermes 89.3.p. 257-287.

FARRELL, C.A. (2012). Laconism and democracy: re-reading the Lakedaeimonian Politeaand re-thinking Xenophon. En: PAUL,J. (ed.). Governing Diversities: Democracy, Diversity and HumanNature. Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.p. 10-35.

GENETTE, G. (1979). Introduction à l'architexte. Paris, Éditions de Seuil.

GERA, D. (1993). Xenophon's Cyropaedia: Style, Genre, and Literary Technique. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

GIGON, O. (1953). Kommentar zum ersten Buch von Xenophons Memorabilien. Basel, Friedrich Reinhardt AG.

GRAY, V. (ed.) (2007). Xenophon. On Government. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

GRAY, V. (2011). Xenophon's Mirror of Princes. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

HARMAN, R. (2009). Viewing Spartans, viewing barbarians. En: HODKINSON, S. (ed.). Sparta: Comparative Approaches. Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.p. 361-382.

HEATH, M. (2009). Codifications of rhetoric. En: GUNDERSON, E. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.p. 59-73.

HIGGINS, W. E. (1977). Xenophon the Athenian. Albany, State University of New York Press.HOBDEN, F.; TUPLIN, C. (eds.) (2012). Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, Leiden, Brill.

HUMBLE, N. (1999). Sôphrosynê and the Spartans in Xenophon. En: POWELL, A.; HODKINSON, S. (eds.). Sparta: New Perspectives. Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.p. 339-353.

HUMBLE, N. (2004). The author, date and purpose of Chapter 14 of the Lakedaimonion Politeia.En: TUPLIN, C. (ed.). The World of Xenophon. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.p. 215-228.

HUMBLE, N. (2011). Xenophon's Anabasis: self and other in fourth-century Greece. En: CROWLEY, P.; HUMBLE, N.; ROSS, S. (eds.). Mediterranean Travels.Oxford, Legenda.p. 14-31.

HUMBLE, N. (2018a). Sparta in Xenophon and Plato. En: DANZIG, G.; JOHNSON, D.; MORRISON, D. (eds.). Plato and Xenophon: Comparative Studies.Leiden, Brill.p. 547-575.

HUMBLE, N. (2018b). Socratic elements in Xenophon's non-Socratic works. En: STAVRU, A.; MOORE, C. (eds.). Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue. Leiden, Brill.p. 577-597.

HUMBLE, N. (2018c). Xenophon and Isocrates on Sparta. En: TAMIOLAKI, M. (ed.). Xenophon and Isocrates. Political Affinities and Literary Interactions. Special issue of Trends in Classics10.1.p. 56-74.

HUMBLE, N. (2020). True History: Xenophon's Agesilaosand the encomiastic genre. En: POWELL, A.; RICHER, N. (eds.). Xenophon and Sparta.Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.p. 291-317.

HUMBLE, N. (próximamente). Xenophon of Athens: A Socratic on Sparta. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

JAUSS, H. R. (1970). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New Literary History2.1.p. 7-37.

KELLY, D. (1996). Oral Xenophon. En: Worthington, I. (ed.). Voice into Text: Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece. Leiden, Brill.p. 149-163.KONSTAN, D. (2006). The active reader in Classical Antiquity. Argos30.p. 5-16.

LIPKA, M. (2002). Xenophon's Spartan Constitution: Introduction, Text and Commentary.Berlin, Walter De Gruyter.

LUCCIONI, J. (1948). Les idées politiques et sociales de Xénophon. Paris, Ophrys.

MARR, J. L.; RHODES, P. J. (eds.) (2008). The 'Old Oligarch'. The Constitution of the Athenians attributed to Xenophon.Oxford, Aris & Phillips.

MOORE, J. M. (1983). Aristotle and Xenophon on Democracy and Oligarchy.London, Chatto & Windus.

MUELLER-GOLDINGEN, C. (1995). Untersuchungen zur Xenophons Kyrupädie. Stuttgart/Leipzig, Teubner.

NICOLAI, R. (2004). Studi su Isocrate. La comunicazione letteraria nel IV sec. a.C. e i nuovi generi della prosa. Rome, Edizioni Quasar.

NICOLAI, R. (2018). Genre, models and functions of Xenophon's Anabasisin comparison with Isocrates'. En: TAMIOLAKI, M. (ed.). Xenophon and Isocrates. Political Affinities and Literary Interactions. Número especial de Trends in Classics10.1.p. 197-217.

OLLIER, F. (ed.) (1934). Xénophon. La République des Lacédémoniens. Lyon, A. Rey.

PONTIER, P. (2006). Trouble et Ordre chez Platon et Xénophon. Paris, J. Vrin.

POWNALL, F. (2008). Critias' Commemoration of Athens. Mouseion8.3.p. 333-354.

RHODES, P. J. (1993). A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

RIEDINGER, J.-C. (1991). Etude sur les Helléniques. Xénophon et l'histoire.Paris, Les Belles Lettres.

ROOD, T. (2004). Xenophon and Diodorus: continuing Thucydides.En: TUPLIN, C. (ed.). The World of Xenophon. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.p. 341-395.

ROWE, C. (2007). Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

SANDRIDGE, N.B. (2012). Loving Humanity, Learning, and Being Honoured: The Foundations of Leadership in Xenophon's Education of Cyrus. Washington, Centre for Hellenic Studies.

SCHOFIELD, M. (2006). Plato: Political Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

SORDI, M. (2002). L'Athenaion Politeiae Senofonte. Aevum76.p. 17-24.

STRAUSS, L. (1939). The spirit of Sparta or the taste of Xenophon. Social Research6.p. 502-36.

TAMIOLAKI, M. (ed.) (2018). Xenophon and Isocrates. Political Affinities and Literary Interactions. Special issue of Trends in Classics10.1

TATUM, J. (1989). Xenophon's Imperial Fiction. On the Education of Cyrus.Princeton, Princeton University Press.

THOMAS, R. (2003). Prose performance texts: epideixisand written publication in the late fifth and early fourth centuries. En: YUNIS, H. (ed.). Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece.Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.p. 162-188.

TREU, M. (1966). Ps.-Xenophon: D. REixa/2.p. 1928-1982.

TUPLIN, C. (1993). The Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica2.3.11-7.5.27. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.

UPLIN, C. (1994). Xenophon, Sparta and the Cyropaedia. En: POWELL, A.; HODKINSON, S. (eds.). The Shadow of Sparta. London, Routledge.p. 127-181.

TREU, M. (1966). Ps.-Xenophon: D. REixa/2.p. 1928-1982.

TUPLIN, C. (1993). The Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica2.3.11-7.5.27. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.

TUPLIN, C. (1994). Xenophon, Sparta and the Cyropaedia. En: POWELL, A.; HODKINSON, S. (eds.). The Shadow of Sparta. London, Routledge.p. 127-181.

TUPLIN, C.(1996). Xenophon's Cyropaedia: education and fiction. En: SOMMERSTEIN, A. H.; ATHERTHON, C. (eds.). Education in Greek Fiction. Bari.p. 65-162.

TYNYANOV, Y. (2000). The Literary Fact. (trad. A. Shukman). En: DUFF, D. (ed.). Modern Genre Theory. Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd. p. 29-49 (Primera publicación: 1924).

USHER, S. (1990). Isocrates. Panegyricus and To Nicocles (traducción, introducción y comentario). Warminster, Aris & Phillips.

YUNIS, H. (2003). Writing for reading: Thucydides, Plato, and the emergence of the critical reader. En: YUNIS, H. (ed.). Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.p. 189-212.

La innovación genérica en Lacedaimonion Politeia revisitada

Autores

DOI:

Palavras-chave:

Resumo

Downloads

Referências

Downloads

Publicado

Como Citar

Edição

Seção

Licença

Idioma