Opinions, Arguments, and the Persuasive (pithanon) in Epictetus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_36_01Keywords:
Stoic Logic, sophisms, Stoicism, EpictetusAbstract
Epictetus follows Stoic orthodoxy - and Zeno’s own definition - by emphasizing the importance of logic in detecting sophisms. He goes so far as to assert that it is a virtue that subsumes four others: carefulness, caution, irrefutability and seriousness. In this paper, we argue that Epictetus’ interest in the testing of presentations extends also to premises and arguments. We demonstrate how Epictetus, following Chrysippus, creates a systematic approach to understanding sophisms/arguments. The philosopher must understand the consequences of what has been granted, offer valid demonstrations, follow the demonstrations of his interlocutors, and ultimately be able to detect sophisms. These sophisms, as well as the premises and arguments connected with them, are often characterized by Epictetus as pithanon. We argue that what he means by this is that the sophisms and their components are deceptive, often deliberately so. To make such a judgement, however, the philosopher must master Stoic dialectics and the study of sophisms.
Downloads
References
ALESSANDRELLI, M.; RANOCCHIA, G. (2017). Scrittore Stoico anonimo opera incerta PHerc. 1020, coll. 104-112 Roma, ILIESI-CNR.
ANNAS, J.; BARNES, J. (2000). Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of scepticism Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
ANNAS, J. (1991). Helenistic Philosophy of Mind Berkeley, University of California Press.
BAILLY. (2000). Dictionnaire Grec-Français. Le Grand Bailly Paris, Hachette.
BARNES, J. (1997). Logic and the Imperial Stoa Leiden, Brill.
BARNES, J. Pithana synnemena. In: BARNES, J. (2013) Logical Matters: Essays in Ancient Philosophy II Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BASORE, J. W. (1932). Seneca: Moral Essays, Vol. II: De Consolatione ad Marciam De Vita Beata. De Otio, De Tranquillitate Animi. De Brevitate Vitae. De Consolatione ad Polvbium. De Consolatione ad Helviam Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
BOBZIEN, S. Stoic Logic In: INWOOD, B. (1996). Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BOBZIEN, S. Stoic Syllogistic. In: INWOOD, B. (2003). The Cambridge Companion to Stoics Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BURY, R. G. B. (trad.) (1935). Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
BURY, R. G. B. (trad.) (1949). Sextus Empiricus. Against the Professors. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
CASTAGNOLLI, L.; FAIT, P. (2023). Validity and Syllogism. In: CASTAGNOLLI, L.; FAIT, P. The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Logic Oxford, Cambridge University Press.
CHIARADONNA, R. (2014). Galen on what is persuasive (‘pithanon’) and what approximates to truth. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement, n. 114, p. 61-88.
DE LACY, P. (2005). Galen: the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis) Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.
DINUCCI, A. (2014). O Encheiridion de Epicteto Coimbra, Imprensa de Coimbra.
DINUCCI, A. (2019). As diatribes de Epicteto, Livro I Coimbra, Imprensa de Coimbra.
DINUCCI, A.; DUARTE, V. et. al . (2016). Introdução à lógica proposicional estoica São Cristóvão, EdiUFS.
DINUCCI, A.; RUDOLPH, K. (2024). Os três tópicos da filosofia de Epicteto. Nuntius Antiquus 20, n. 1, p. 1-38.
DINUCCI, A.; RUDOLPH, K. (2022). A persuasividade dos Asseríveis e dos Argumentos no Estoicismo Antigo. Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental, n. 32, p. 1-31.
GASKIN, R. (1995) The Sea Battle and the Master Argument: Aristotle and Diodorus Cronus on the Metaphysics of the Future Berlin, De Gruyter.
GOODWIN, W. (1874). Plutarch’s Morals. Translated from the Greek by several hands: corrected and revised Boston, Little, Brown, and Co.
HICKS, R. D. (trad.) (1972). Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge, Harvard University Press .
INWOOB, B. (1985). Reason and Human Action in Early Stoicism Oxford, Oxford University Press.
LESSES, G. (1998). Content, Cause and Stoic Impressions. Phronesis 43, n. 1, p. 2-24.
LONG, A. A.; SEDLEY, D. (1987a). Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. I Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LONG, A. A.; SEDLEY, D. (1987b). Hellenistic Philosophers , vol. II Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LONG, A. A. (1978). Dialectic and the Stoic sage. In: RIST, J. M. (ed.). The Stoics Berkeley, University of California Press.
LONG, G. (ed.). (1890). Epictetus, the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion and Fragments London, George Bell.
Morison, B. Sextus Empiricus. (2019). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition). Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/sextus-empiricus/
» https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/sextus-empiricus/
MURACHCO, H. (2001). Língua Grega: visão semântica, lógica, orgânica e funcional São Paulo, Discurso Editoral/Editora Vozes.
POMEROY, A. J. (ed.). (1999). Arius Didymus, Epitome of Stoic ethics Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.
RACKHAM, H. (ed.). (1914). On Ends Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
RACKHAM, H. (ed.). (1942). Cicero, On the Orator: Book 3 On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
RACKHAM, H. (ed.). (1993). Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods. Academics. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
ROLFE, J. C. (ed.). (2002). Aulus Gellius Attic Nights Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
SEDLEY, D. (1997). Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 203, p. 74-120.
SEDLEY, D. (1982). On signs. In: BARNES, J. et al. (eds.). Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
SEDLEY, D. (1984). The negated conjunction in Stoicism. Elenchos 5, p. 311-316.
SCHWEIGHAUSER. (1800). Epictetege Philosophiae Monumenta Leipzig, Weidmann.
SHIELDS, C. (1993). The truth evaluability of stoic phantasiai: Adversus Mathematicos VII. Journal of the History of Philosophy 31, n. 3, p. 242-246.
STEWART, A. (ed.). (1887). Seneca, On Benefits London, George Bell.
TIELEMAN, T. (1996). Galen and Crisipo on the soul Leiden, Brill.
VON ARNIM, H. (2005). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, vols. 1, 2, 3 Berlin, De Gruyter.
YONGE, C. D. (1993). The works of Philo: Complete and Unabridged Peabody, Hendrickson Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aldo Dinucci, Kelli Rudolph
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
