The Persuasiveness of Assertives and Arguments in Ancient Stoicism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_32_29Keywords:
Persuasiveness, Stoicism, Ancient logic, HellenismAbstract
In the first part, we survey the occurrences of pithanon (‘persuasive’) and related terms in texts and fragments of Ancient Stoicism referring to the persuasiveness of assertibles and arguments, and fragments in which the Stoic logic is presented as the tool to avoid the persuasiveness of sophisms and the Stoic sage as the one who can efface this persuasiveness by his expertise in dialectics. Once it is done, we consider critically the assessments of Chiaradona Sedley and Tieleman, for whom Chrysippus is interested in extralogical forms of discourse, and also another thesis from Tieleman, according to which Chrysippus uses persuasive premises for constructive purposes. In our conclusions, we discard the thesis concerning Chrysippus' recognition of extra-logical truths, on the basis of the Stoic ideal of the sage. We conclude that, in Stoicism, (1) pithanon refers primarily to false assertibles, arguments and presentations and (2) the Stoic sage cannot be persuaded, but he can persuade his students in order to prepare their souls to receive the Stoic doctrines.
Downloads
References
ALESSANDRELLI, Michelle; RANOCCHIA, Graziano. (2017). Scrittore Stoico anonimo opera incerta. PHerc. 1020, coll. 104-112. Roma, ILIESI-CNR.
ANNAS, J; BARNES, J. (ed.). (2000). Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of scepticism. (ed.). Cambridge, Cambridge University press.
ANNAS, J. (1991). Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley, University of California Press.
BARNES, J. (2013). Pithana synnemena. In: BARNES, J (ed.). Logical Matters: Essays in Ancient Philosophy II. Oxford, Oxford
University Press, p. 499-511.
BASORE, J. W. (ed.) (1932). Seneca: Moral Essays, Volume II: De Consolatione ad Marciam. De Vita Beata. De Otio. De Tranquillitate Animi. De Brevitate Vitae. De Consolatione ad Polybium. De Consolatione ad Helviam. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
BOBZIEN, S. (1996). Stoic Logic. In: INWOOD, B. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 133-192.
BOBZIEN, S. (2003) Stoic Syllogistic. In: INWOOD, B. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Stoics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 2003.
BRENNAN, T. (2000). Reservation in Stoic Ethics. Archiv f. Gesch.d. Philosophie 82, p. 149-177.
BURY, R. G. B. (ed.) (1935). Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. Translated by Robert Greg Bury. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
BURY, R. G. B. (ed.) (1949). Sextus Empiricus. Against the Professors. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
CHIARADONNA, R. (2014). Galen on what is persuasive (‘pithanon’) and what approximates to truth. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement, n. 114, p. 61–88.
DE LACY, P. (ed.) (2005). Galen: the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis. Berlin, AkademieVerlag.
DINUCCI, A. (ed.) (2007). O Manual de Epicteto. São Cristóvão, EdiUFS.
DINUCCI, A.; DUARTE, V. et alii. (2016). Introdução à lógica proposicional estoica. São Cristóvão, EdiUFS.
GOODWIN, W. (ed.) (1874). Plutarch's Morals. Translated from the Greek by several hands. Corrected and revised by., PH. D. Boston, Little, Brown, and Company.
HICKS, R. D. (ed.) (1972). Diogenes Laertius, Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
INWOOD, B. (1985). Reason and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
LESSES, G. (1998). Content, Cause and Stoic Impressions. Phronesis XLIII/1, p. 2-24.
LONG, A.A.; SEDLEY. D. (1987a). Hellenistic Philosophers, vol I. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LONG, A.A.; SEDLEY. D. (1987b). Hellenistic Philosophers, vol II. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LONG, A.A. (1978) Dialectic and the Stoic sage. In: RIST, J. M. (ed.). The Stoics. Berkeley, University of California Press.
LONG, G. (ed.) (1890). Epictetus, the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion and Fragments. Translated by George Long. Londres, George Bell. [Diss.]
MORISON, B. (2019). Sextus Empiricus. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring Edition). Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
Available at URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/sextusempiricus/>.
NUSSBAUM, M. C. (1994). The Therapy of Desire. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
POMEROY, A. J. (ed.) (1999). Arius Didymus, Epitome of Stoic ethics. Atlanta, Society of Biblical Literature.
RACKHAM, H. (ed.) (1914). On Ends. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
RACKHAM, H. (ed.) (1942). Cicero, On the Orator: Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
RACKHAM, H. (ed.) (1993). Cicero, On the Nature of the Gods. Academics. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
ROLFE, J. C. (ed.) (2002). Aulus Gellius Attic Nights. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
SEDLEY, D. (1977). Diodorus Cronus and hellenistic philosophy. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 203, p. 74-120.
SEDLEY, D. (1982). On signs. In: BARNES, J. et al. (eds.), Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 239-72.
SEDLEY, D. (1984). The negated conjunction in Stoicism. Elenchos 5, p. 311-16.
SHIELDS, C. (1993). The truth evaluability of stoic phantasiai: Adversus Mathematicos VII. Journal of the History of Philosophy 31, n. 3 p. 242-46.
STEWART, A. (ed.) (1887). Seneca, On benefits. London, George Bell.
TIELEMAN, T. (1996). Galen and Crisipo on the soul. Leiden, Brill.
VON ARNIM, H. (2005a). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta vol. 1: Zeno or Zenonis Discipuli. Berlin, De Gruyter.
VON ARNIM, H. (2005b).Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta vol. 2: Chrysippi Fragmenta Logica et Physica. Berlin, De Gruyter.
VON ARNIM, H. (2005c). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta vol. 3: Chrysippi fragmenta moralia. Fragmenta Successorum Chrysippi. Berlin, De Gruyter.
YONGE, C. D. (1993). The works of Philo. Complete and Unabridged. Peabody, Hendrickson Publishers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Aldo Dinucci, Kelli Rudolph
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
