A New Theology for a New Society in Empedocles's Verses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_35_17Keywords:
Empedocles, On nature, Purifications, Daimon, Politics, Ancient SicilyAbstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze Empedocles’s main doctrines in the light of his historical and cultural context. To be precise, I will attempt to show how the Agrigentum and Sicily of his time - ravaged by inter-Greek wars, infighting between the various social classes, and even indigenous Sicilians’ revolts against Greek settlers - bore witness, in his eyes, to the ever-increasing power of Strife, which was influencing the cosmos not solely on a physical level but also on a moral one. Empedocles hoped in the exit from the present cosmic cycle through the attainment of a higher condition, capable of transforming the daimones into ‘holy minds’, i.e. into entities completely imbued with Love and, for this reason, unassailable by Strife in this cosmic phase, well before the return of the sphere. In this way, Empedocles tried to found a new theology, with Love as the main deity, and a new ethical code, in opposition to traditional poems and values, which were the expression, as everything else in the world save for his On nature and Purifications, of Strife.
Downloads
References
ADAMESTEANU, D. (1962). L’ellenizzazione della Sicilia e il momento di Ducezio. Kokalos 8, p. 167-198.
ADORNATO, G. (2006). Monumenti per una vittoria. Agrigento e Siracusa tra alleanze e rivalità. In: VAGGIOLI, M. A.; MICHELINI, C. (a cura di). Guerra e pace in Sicilia e nel Mediterraneo antico (VIII-III sec. a.C.): arte, prassi e teoria della pace e della guerra Pisa, Edizioni della Normale, p. 447-460.
ALVAREZ, J. (2024). Empedocles’s Ethics on the Daimones and Their Purification. In: Decker, J. E.; Ferriss-Hill, J.; Reid, H. L. (eds.). Empedocles in Sicily, Syracuse, Parnassos Press, p. 79-95.
ASHERI, D. (1990). Agrigento libera: rivolgimenti interni e problemi costituzionali, ca. 471-446 a.C. Athenaeum 78, p. 483-501.
BATTEGAZZORE, A. M. (1991). Il linguaggio di Empedocle In: IMBRAGUGLIA, G.; BADOLATI, G. S.; MORCHIO, R.; BATTEGAZZORE, A. M.; MESSINA, G. (a cura di). Index Empedocleus, Genua, Erga, p. 69-75.
BEEKES, R.; VAN BEEK, L. (2010). Etymological Dictionary of Greek Leiden-Boston, Brill.
BIGNONE, E. (1916). I poeti filosofi della Grecia: Empedocle, studio critico, traduzione e commento delle testimonianze e dei frammenti, Torino, Fratelli Bocca.
CAPIZZI, A. (1987). Trasposizioni del lessico omerico in Parmenide ed Empedocle. Osservazioni su un problema di metodo. Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 25, p. 107-118.
CERRI, G. (2006). Empedocle narratore di miti: la vicenda cosmica. AION (filol.) 27, p. 49-63.
CIAMPA, C. R. (2021). Eschatological Visions in Pindar and Empedocles. In: Marlow, H. F.; Pollmann, K.; Van Noorden, H. (eds.). Eschatology in Antiquity: Forms and Functions London-New York, Routledge, p. 131-143.
DARCUS, S. (1985). The Nature of Phren in Empedocles. In: CAPASSO, M.; DE MARTINO, F.; ROSATI, P. (a cura di). Studi di filosofia preplatonica Napoli, Bibliopolis, p. 119-136.
DE MIRO, E. (1998). Società e arte nell’età di Empedocle. Elenchos 19, p. 327-344.
DIELS, H.; KRANZ, W. (1951). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker Berlin, Weidmannsche Buchhandllung.
DRODZEK, A. (2007). Empedocles and the Holy Phren In: DRODZEK, A. (ed.). Greek Philosophers as Theologians. The Divine Arche, London-New York, Routledge, p. 71-83.
GALLAVOTTI, C. (1980). Da Stesicoro a Empedocle. Kokalos 28, p. 413-433.
HERSHBELL, J.P (1970). Hesiod and Empedocles. The Classical Journal 65, p. 145-161.
KAHN, C.H. (1971). Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul. In: ANTON, J.P.; KUSTAS, G.L. (eds.). Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy Albany, SUNY, p. 3-38.
LONG, A. A. (1966). Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?. Classical Quarterly 16, p. 256-276.
MELE, A. (2006). Empedocle e Agrigento. In: CASERTANO, G. (a cura di). Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica Napoli, Loffredo, p. 179-197.
MILLINO, G. (2000). La caduta delle tirannidi ad Agrigento, Gela e Imera. In: BRACCESI, L. (a cura di). Hesperìa 12. Studi sulla grecità d’occidente Roma, L’Erma di Bretschneider, p. 235-256.
MOST, G. W. (2006). ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται. Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic In: BIERL, A. , LÄMMLE, R.; WESSELMANN, K. (hrsg.). Literatur und Religion I: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, Berlin, De Gruyter, p. 271-302.
NAGY, G. (2006). Hymnic Elements in Empedocles (B35DK = 201 Bollack). Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 24, p. 51-62.
O’BRIEN, D. (2016). Empedocles on the Identity of the Elements. Elenchos 37, p. 5-32.
OSBORNE (= ROWETT), C. (1987). Empedocles Recycled. Classical Quarterly 37, p. 24-50.
OSBORNE (= ROWETT), C. (1998). Was Verse the Default Form of Presocratic Philosophy? Response to M. R. Wright. In: ATHERTON, C. (ed.). Form and Content in Didactic Poetry Bari, Laterza, p. 23-35.
PALUMBO, L. (2006). Empedocle e il linguaggio poetico. In: CASERTANO, G. (a cura di). Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica . Napoli, Loffredo , p. 83-107.
PICOT, J.-C. (2023). L’hymne à l’Amour d’Empédocle sur fond de violence épique (Homère et Apollonios de Rhodes). Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 2, p. 76-105.
PICOT, J.-C.; BERG, W. (2015). Lions and promoi: Final Phase of Exile for Empedocles’ daimones Phronesis 60, p. 380-409.
PICOT, J.-C.; BERG, W. (2018). Apollo, Eros, and Epic Allusions in Empedocles, fr. 134 and 29 DK. American Journal of Philology 139, p. 365-396.
PORTER, J. I. (2025). Love, Strife, and the Roots of All Things: Empedoclean Cosmopoiesis. Representations 169, p. 11-27.
PRIMAVESI, O. (2008). Empedocles: physical and mythical divinity. In: CURD, P.; GRAHAM, D.W. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 250-283.
RIZZO, F. P. (1970). La repubblica di Siracusa e il momento di Ducezio Palermo, U. Maneredi.
ROBINSON, E. (2000). Democracy in Syracuse, 466-412 BC. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 100, p. 189-205.
RODRIGUEZ, C.M. (2011). La transmigración en la poesía de Empédocles. In: BERNABÉ, A.; KAHLE, M.; SANTAMARÍA ÁLVAREZ, M. A. (eds.). Reencarnación: La transmigración de las almas entre Oriente y Occidente Madrid, Abada, p. 269-282.
ROWETT, C. (2016). Love, Sex and the Gods: Why Things Have Divine Names in Empedocles’ Poem, and Why They Come in Pairs. Rhizomata 4, p. 80-110.
SARTORI, F. (1980). Storia costituzionale della Sicilia antica. Kokalos 26, p. 263-291.
TRÉPANIER, S. (2003). Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24, p. 1-57.
TRÉPANIER, S. (2013). From Wandering Limbs to Limbless Gods: δαίμων as Substance in Empedocles. Apeiron 47, p. 172-210.
TRÉPANIER, S. (2017). From Hades to the Stars: Empedocles on the Cosmic Habitats of Soul. Classical Antiquity 36, p. 130-182.
WRIGHT, M. R. (1995) Empedocles: the Extant Fragments. Edited with Introduction, Commentary, Concordance and New Bibliography London, Bristol Classical Press (1ed. 1981).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Federico Casella
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
