The Stoic concept of phantasia

from Zeno to Chrysippu

Authors

  • Aldo Lopes Dinucci Universidade Federal de Sergipe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_21_1

Keywords:

Phantasia, Stoicism, Cleanthes, Chrysippus

Abstract

In this paper we will deal with the question of the translation of the term phantasia, with closely related concepts, with the distinction between Cleanthus’ conception of phantasia and the developments made by Chrysippus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aldo Lopes Dinucci, Universidade Federal de Sergipe

aldodinucci@yahoo.com.br

References

ANNAS, J. (1980). Truth and knowledge. In: BURNYEAT, M et alii (eds.). Doubt and dogmatism.

Oxford, Oxford University Press.

ANNAS, J. (1990). Stoic epistemology. In: STEPHEN, E. (ed.). Epistemology. Companions to ancient thought, vol 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

ANNAS, J. (1991). Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley, University of California Press.

ANNAS, J. (2003). Stoic Logic. In: INWOOD, B. (org.) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p.85-123.

Augustus Meineke (ed.) (1885). Estobeu. Florilegium, vol I e II (translation, introduction and notes). Lipsiae, Taubner.

BAILLY. 2000. Dictionnaire Grec-Français. Le Grand Bailly. Paris: Hachette.

BENEDICT, E; DE LACY, P. (1967). Plutarco. Moralia, Volume XIV. That Epicurus Actually Makes a Pleasant Life Impossible. Reply to Colotes in Defence of the Other Philosophers. Is “Live Unknown” a Wise

Precept? On Music. (translation, introduction and notes). Harvard, Loeb Classical Library.

BOTROS, S. (1985). Freedom, Causality, Fatalism and Early Stoic Philosophy. Phronesis 30 (3), p.274-304. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852885X00101

BRITO, R.; DINUCCI, A. “Tradução e Apresentação da Diatribe de Epicteto 1.5”. IN: Journal of Ancient philosophy, São Paulo, volume 8, n. 2, p. 116-130, 2014.

BURY R. G. (1933). Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Pyrrhonism. (translation, introduction and notes). Harvard, Loeb Classical Library.

BURY R. G. (1935). Sextus Empiricus. Against the Logicians. (translation, introduction and notes). Harvard, Loeb Classical Library.

BURY R. G. (1949). Sextus Empiricus. Against the Professors. (translation, introduction and notes). Bury. Harvard, Loeb Classical Library.

CHERNISS, H. (1976). Plutarco. Moralia, Volume XVIII, parte 2. Stoic essays. (translation, introduction

and notes). Harvard, Loeb Classical Library.

DOBBIN, R. 1991. Î ÏοαίÏεσις in Epictetus. Ancient Philosophy 11 (1), p.111-135. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199111138

FREDE, M. (1983). Stoics and skeptics on clear and distinct impressions. In: M. BURNYEAT (ed.). Skeptic Tradition. Berkeley, University of California Press, p.65-93.

INWOOD, B.; GERSON, L. P. (1988). Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Co.

LESSES, G. (1988). Content, Cause and Stoic Impressions. Phronesis vol. XLIII/1, p.2- 24.

LIDDELL, H; SCOTT, R; Jones, H. (1940). GreekEnglish Lexicon. Oxford, Clarendon.

LONG & SEDLEY. (1987a). Hellenistic Philosophers, vol I. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

LONG & SEDLEY. (1987b). Hellenistic Philosophers, vol II. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

LONG, A. A. (1968). The Stoic Concept of Evil. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (73), p. 329-343. https://doi.org/10.2307/2217794

LONG, A A. (1991). Representation and the self in Stoicism. In: STEPHEN EVERSON (ed.). Companions to Ancient Thought 2: Psychology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p.102-120.

MODRAK, D. K. W. (1993). Stoics, Epicureans and Mental Content. Apeiron 26(2), p. 97 -108. https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.1993.26.2.97

NUSSBAUM, M. (1978). Aristotles’ de motu Animalium. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

HICKS, R. D.(1925). Diógenes Laércio. Lives of Eminent Philosophers, vol. I, II. (translation, introduction and notes). Harvard, Loeb Classical Library.

RACKHAM, H. (1942). Cícero. On the Orator: Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory. (translation, introduction and notes). Trad. Harvard: Loeb Classical Library.

SEDLEY, D. (1993). Chrysippus on psychophysical causality. In: NUSSBAUM, M. C. (ed.). Passions and Perceptions - Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 313-331.

SEDLEY, D. (2014). A definição de Zenão de phantasia kataleptike. Prometeus, n. 15, p. 147- 164.

SHIELDS, C. (1993). The Truth Evaluability of Stoic Phantasiai: Adversus Mathematicos VII 242-46. Journal of History of Philosophy, vol. 31, n° 3. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1993.0049

SORABJI, R. Perceptual Content in the Stoics. (1990). Phronesis, vol. XXXV/3,, p. 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852890X00213

VON ARNIM, H. (2005). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta Volume 1: Zeno or Zenonis Discipuli. Berlim, De Gruyter.

VON ARNIM, H. (2005). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta Volume 2: Chrysippi Fragmenta Logica et Physica. Berlim, De Gruyter,.

VON ARNIM, H. (2005). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta Volume 3: Chrysippi fragmenta moralia. Fragmenta Successorum Chrysippi. Berlim, De Gruyter.

VON ARNIM, H. (2005). Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta Volume 4: Indeces. Berlim, De Gruyter.

WATSON, G. (1966). The stoic theory of knowledge. Belfast, Queens University Classics.

Published

2017-09-01

How to Cite

Dinucci, A. L. (2017). The Stoic concept of phantasia: from Zeno to Chrysippu. Revista Archai, (21), 15. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_21_1