What is cognitive in metaphor according to Aristotle?

Authors

  • André Laks Universidad Panamericana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_30_32

Keywords:

metaphor, analogy, similitude, cognition, quasi-cognition, understanding, trope, rhetoric, enthymeme, pleasure, Ricœur, Dumarsais

Abstract

In the Poetics (21 1457b6 f.), Aristotle, defines metaphor as the transfer (epiphora) of a term from a given, foreign (allotrios) domain to another one. If, as does the classical doctrine of tropes, we consider that it substitutes the ‘proper’ term, the metaphor has a purely ornamental value and we can do without it. Modern theories insist, on the contrary, on the cognitive value of the metaphor: because it offers a re-description of the world, the metaphor is “alive” (Paul Ricœur). The question is to what extent this cognitive conception of metaphor, in spite of its classical reception, is already at work in Aristotle’s differentiated analysis of the phenomenon, as Ricœur claims. The answer is ‘yes but rather no’. This is because the cognition Aristotle talks about in relation to metaphor is of a special type, a “quasi-cognition”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERNABÉ, A. (trad.) (1998). Aristóteles. Retórica. Madrid, Alianza Editorial.

BOYS-STONES, G. R. (ed.) (2003). Metaphor, allegory, and the classical tradition: ancient thought and modern revisions. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press.

BREMER, D. (1980). Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher. Poetica 12, p. 350-376.

BRUNSCHWIG, J. (1967). Aristote. Topiques (1-4). Paris, Les Belles-Lettres.

BURNYEAT, M. F. (1994). Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion. In: NEHAMAS, A.; FURLEY, D. (eds.). Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays. Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 3-55.

COPE, E. M.; SANDYS, J. E. (1877). The Rhetoric of Aristotle. 3 vols. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (Reimpreso en 1 vol. 1973)

DIELS, H. (1886). Über das dritte Buch der aristotelischen Rhetorik. Philosophische und historische Abhandlungen Koenigl. Preuss. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1886, p. 3-34.

DOREEN, I. (2003). Metaphor, Simile, and Allegory as Ornaments of Style. In: BOYS-STONES, G. R. (ed.). Metaphor, allegory, and the classical tradition: ancient thought and modern revisions. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, p. 7-30.

DUMARSAIS, C. C. (1967). Les Tropes (1730). Con el comentario de M. Fontanier. Reimpreso con una introducción de G. Genette. Genève, Slatkine reprints. (Pub. orig. 1818)

DUPONT ROC, R.; LALLOT, J. (eds.) (1980). Aristote. La Poétique. Paris, Seuil.

FLASHAR, H. (1983). Aristoteles. In: FLASHAR, H. (ed.). Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike 3. Altere Akademie. Aristoteles. Peripatos. Basel, Schwabe, p. 175-457.

GADAMER, H.-G. (1973). Wahrheit und Methode. 3ed. Tübingen, Mohr.

GENETTE, G. (1970). ΜΕΤΑΦΟΡΑ. La Rhétorique restreinte. Communications 16, p. 158-171.

HESSE, M. B. (1965). The Explanatory Function of Metaphor. In: BAR-HILLEL, Y. (ed.). Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing, p. 249-259.

KIRBY, J. T. (1997). Aristotle on Metaphor. American Journal of Philology 118, p. 517-554.

LAKS, A. (1992). Zeitgewinn. Bemerkungen zum Unterschied zwischen Metapher und Vergleich in Aristoteles Rhetorik. In: RUDOLPH, E.; WISMANN, H. (eds.). Sagen, was die Zeit ist. Analysen zur Zeitlichkeit der Sprache. Stuttgart, Metzler, p. 11-19.

LAKS, A. (1994). Substitution et connaissance : pour une interprétation unitaire (ou presque) de la théorie aristotélicienne de la métaphore. In: FURLEY, D.; NEHAMAS, A. (eds.). Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Philosophical Essays. Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 283-305.

LAKS, A. (2004). Aristote, l’allégorie et les débuts de la philosophie. In: PÉREZ-JEAN, B.; EICHEL-LOJKINE, P. (eds.). L’Allégorie de l’Antiquité Ã la Renaissance. Paris, Champion, p. 211-220.

LAKS, A. (2007). Histoire, Doxographie, Vérité. Études sur Aristote, Théophraste, et la philosophie présocratique. Louvain-la-Neuve, Peeters.

LALLOT, J. (1988). Le fonctionnement sémiotique de la métaphore selon Aristote. Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage 9, p. 47-58.

LLOYD, G. E. R. (1987). The Revolutions of Wisdom. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, University of California Press.

MARX, F. (1900). Aristoteles Rhetorik. Berichte d. kgl. sächsischen Gesellschaft d. Wiss. z. Leipzig 52, p. 241-328.

MOST, G. W. (1987). Seeming and Being: Sign and Metaphor in Aristotle. In: AMSLER, M. (ed.). Creativity and the Imagination. Case Studies ftom the Classical Age to the Twentieth Century. Newark/London/Toronto, University of Delaware Press, p. 1-33.

PETIT, A. (1988). Métaphore et mathésis dans la Rhétorique d’Aristote. Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage 9, p. 59-71.

RAPP, C. (2002). Aristoteles. Rhetorik. Übersetzt und erläutert. 2 vols. Berlin, Akademie Verlag.

RICŒUR, P. (2001). La Metáfora viva. Trad. A. Neira. 2ed. Madrid, Cristiandad/Trotta. (Pub. orig. FR 1975)

STARK, R. (ed.) (1968). Rhetorika, Schriften zur aristotelischen und hellenistischen Rhetorik. Hildesheim, Olms.

TAMBA-MECZ, I.; VEYNE, P. (1979). Metaphora et comparaison chez Aristote. Revue des Études Grecques 92, p. 77-98.

Published

2020-11-10

How to Cite

Laks, A. (2020). What is cognitive in metaphor according to Aristotle?. Revista Archai, (30), e03032. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_30_32