The Demon of Technology
The History of Western Demonology and its role in the contemporary nature-technology debate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_29_2Keywords:
demons, philosophy, technology, human natureAbstract
Contemporary advanced technology seems to raise new and fundamental questions as it apparently provides a human subject with an infinite range of incoming possibilities. Accordingly, research on the implications of technology is massive and splits into hard critics and faithful supporters. Yet, technological activities cannot be defined in terms of their products alone. Indeed, every technological behaviour unfolds the very same tension against what would have been naturally impossible, in absence of that same behaviour. Thus, the debate on technology appears to be independent from any level of technological sophistication, and so its roots can be traced back in the dawn of Western thought. In this article, I argue that the faithful and sceptic views today at stake on hard-technology can be explained as a revival of the twofold attitude towards demons, developed in the history of Western thought. I show how demons have always embodied the human natural limits and the incomprehensible aspects of reality. Exactly as in the case of demons, hard-technology is now seen as a fearful destroyer of both nature understood as a complex system and human naturalness or as a trustful way to save humanity from decay, which complements what is naturally imperfect and, then, perfectible. Yet, none of these irreducible approaches opens a satisfactory path towards the solution of the contemporary issues on technology. On the contrary, by drawing upon ancient Greek neutral demonology the debate on technology may be definitively returned to its teleological and ethical dimension.
Downloads
References
BALDI, A. (1966). Da «pulla» a «pullicenella» attraverso un graffito pompeiano. Latomus 25, n. 2, p. 291-294.
BARON, F. (1978). Doctor Faustus: From History to Legend. München, Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
BAUDELAIRE, C. (1975). Les Fleurs du mal. In: Oeuvres complètes. Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.
BEKKER, S. M. (1988). Transformation of the Nat’s: the Humanization process in the depiction of the Thirty-seven Lords of Burma. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 4, n. 1 (Special Burma Studies Issue), p. 40-45.
BLAKE, W. (1975). The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. Ed. G. Keynes. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BOCCACCIO, G. (2003). The Decameron. Trans. G. H. McWilliam. 2ed. London, Penguin.
BRAND, P.; PERTILE, L. (eds.) (1999). The Cambridge History of Italian Literature. Revised Edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (1ed 1996)
BRANN, N. L. (2006). “Trithemius, Johannes”. In: HANEGRAFF, W. J. (ed.). Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism. Leiden/Boston, Brill.
BYRON, G. G. (1986). Cain. In: MCGANN, J. J. (ed.). Byron, The Major Works. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CARDUCCI, G. (2017). A Hymn To Satan: & Other Translated Poems. Baltimore, Underworld Amusements.
CAVALCA, D. (1474). Vitae patrum. Venezia, Gabriele di Pietro.
CONTINI, G. (1970). Letteratura italiana delle origini. Firenze, Sansoni.
DE BERNARDI, P. (1992). Socrate, il demone e il risveglio. Sapienza 45, p. 425-443.
DE CAROLI, R. (2004). Haunting the Buddha: Indian Popular Religions and the Formation of Buddhism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DRAWNEL, H. (2014). The Mesopotamian Background of the Enochic Giants and Evil Spirits. Dead Sea Discoveries 21, n. 1, p. 14-38.
DE SANCTIS, F. (1940). Fra Giacomino da Verona e la poesia religiosa del suo tempo. L’ Italia francescana 15, p. 73-78.
EL-ZEIN, A. (2009). Islam, Arabs, and Intelligent World of the Jinn. Syracuse, Syracuse University Press.
FOSTER, K. (1969). Vernacular Scriptures in Italy. LAMPE, C. W. (ed.). The Cambridge History of the Bible. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 456.
FRANCE, A. (1930). La Révolte des Anges. In: Œuvres complètes illustrées. Tome 22. Paris, Calmann-Lévy.
GATTI, H. (2010). Bruno’s Candelaio and Ben Jonson’s The Alchemist. In: Essays on Giordano Bruno. New York, Princeton University Press, p. 161-171.
GETTO, G. (1967). Umanità e stile di Iacopo Passavanti. In: Letteratura Religiosa del Trecento. Firenze, Sansoni.
GINZBURG, C. (1980). The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
GOETHE, J. W. (2014). Faust ”“ A Tragedy. Parts One and Two, Fully Revised. Trans. M. Greenberg. New Haven, Yale University Press.
GRABBE, C. D. (1997). Don Juan und Faust. In: GARLAND, H.; GARLAND, M. (eds.). The Oxford Companion to German Literature. 3ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Pub. Orig. 1829)
GREENE, R. (1927). The Honourable History of Friar Bacon and Friar Bungay. London, Westminster Press for Holden & Co.
HANSEN, W. (2005). Classical Mythology: A Guide to the Mythical World of the Greeks and Romans. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
HART, G. (2005). The Routledge Dictionary of Egyptian Gods and Goddesses. 2ed. Abingdon, Routledge.
HEINE, H. (1851). Der Doktor Faust: Ein Tanzpoem nebst kuriosen berichten über Teufel, Hexen und Dichtkunst. Hamburg, Hoffmann und Campe. Available at https://archive.org/details/derdoktorfauste01heingoog/page/n8/mode/2up.
HOENSELAARS, A. J. (1998). The Politics of Prose and Drama: The Case of Machiavelli’s Belfagor. In: MARRAPODI, M. (ed.). The Italian World of English Renaissance Drama: Cultural Exchange and Intertextuality. Newark, University of Delaware Press, p. 106-121.
HUGO, V. (2013). La Fin de Satan. In: Oeuvres Inedites de Victor Hugo. Vol. 1 La Fin de Satan. Paris, Hachette BnF.
HULTKRANTZ, Ã…. (ed.) (1981). Belief and Worship in Native North America. Syracuse, Syracuse University Press.
KERÉNYI, C. (1997). Prometheus: Archetypal Image of Human Existence. Trans. R. Mannheim. New York, Princeton University Press.
KLINGER, F. M. (1864). Faustus: his Life, Death, and Doom. London, W. Kand and Co. Paternoster-Row. (Pub. Orig. 1791)
LANGE, C. (2015). Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
LENAU, N. (2017). Faust: Ein Gedicht Hofenberg. Berlin, Hofenberg. (Pub. Orig. 1836)
LIDDELL, H. G.; SCOTT, R. (1996). Greek-English Lexicon. 9ed with Revised Supplement. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
LIMA, R. (2005). The Masks of Harlequin: Daemonic Antecedents of the Commedia dell’Arte Character. In: Stages of Evil: Occultism in Western Theater and Drama. Lexington, The University Press of Kentucky, p. 47-82.
MARINO, G. (1967). La Strage degli Innocenti. In: ASOR ROSA, A. (ed.). Opere di Giambattista Marino. Milano, Rizzoli.
MARLOWE, C. (2007). The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus. A Critical Edition of the 1604 Version. Ed. M. Keefer. Peterborough, Broadview Press.
MARLOWE, C. (1962). Doctor Faustus. A- and B-texts (1604, 1616). Ed. D. Bevington & E. Rasmussen. Manchester, University of Manchester Press.
MENENDEZ PELAYO, M. (1881). Teatro selecto de Calderón de la Barca. Tomo 1. Madrid, Luis Navarro.
MERCEY, F. (1840). Le Théatre en Italie. III ”“ Les Théâtres napolitains ”“ Scaramouche et Pulcinella. Revue des Deux Mondes Quatrième Série 22, n. 5, p. 825-856.
MEYNIEUX, A. (1968). Puskin et la Conclusion du Second Faust. Revue des études slaves 47, p. 95-107.
MILTON, J. (2008). Paradise Lost. London, Penguin Classics.
MIRA DE AMESCUA, A. (2004). El esclavo del demonio. Alicante, Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. Available at http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/el-esclavo-del-demonio--0/. (Pub. Orig. 1612)
MORWOOD, J.; TAYLOR, J. (2002). Pocket Oxford Classical Greek Dictionary. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
MÜLLER, F. (2013). Fausts Leben dramatisiert. In: GARLAND, H.; GARLAND, M. (eds.). The Oxford Companion to German Literature. 3ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press. (Pub. Orig. 1778)
NIGOSIAN, S. A. (1993). The Zoroastrian Faith. Tradition and Modern Research. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press.
PASSAVANTI, J. (1495). Specchio di vera penitentia. Florence, Bartolomeo de’ Libri.
PETROCCHI, M. (1967). Scrittori di pietà nella spiritualità toscana e italiana del Trecento. Archivio storico italiano 125, p. 3-33.
POSTIGLIONE, E. (2019). Tra Physis e Techne ”“ Cosa resta dell’essere umano? In: LE MOLI, A.; MIRELLI, R. (eds.). Nature Umane. Proceedings of the Ischia International Festival of Philosophy 2018. Palermo, Palermo University Press, p. 69-82.
PULCI, L. (2000). Morgante: The Epic Adventures of Orlando and His Giant Friend. A complete English translation by Joseph Tusiani. Introduction and notes by Edoardo Lèbano. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
RAPISARDI, M. (1877). Lucifero. Poema. Milano, Libreria editrice G. Brigola.
ROOT, J. (2017). The Theophilus Legend in Medieval Text and Image. Cambridge, D. S. Brewer.
RUICKBIE, L. (2009). Faustus: The Life and Times of a Renaissance Magician. Stroud Gloucestershire, The History Press.
VALÉRY, P. (1967). Mon Faust. Paris, Gallimard. (Pub. Orig. 1946)
VON CHAMISSO, A. (2010). Faust. A Dramatic Sketch. Charleston, Nabu Press. (Pub. Orig. 1804)
WELD, J. S. (1975). Meaning in Comedy: Studies in Elizabethan Romantic Comedy. Albany, State University of New York Press.
WEST, M. L. (ed.) (1966). Hesiod. Theogony. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
WEST, M. L. (ed.) (1978). Hesiod. Works and Days. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
WILSON, J. (1691). Belphegor, or, The marriage of the Devil a tragi-comedy, lately acted at the Queen's Theatre in Dorset-garden. London, J. L. for Luke Meredith.
YANG, L.; AN, D.; TURNER, J. A. (2005). Handbook of Chinese Mythology. New York, Oxford University Press.
![Archai 29 (2020 [2])](https://periodicos.unb.br/public/journals/2/cover_issue_1986_en_US.png)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
