Ancient Perspectives on Technology
Keywords:
editorial, Ancient Philosophy, technologyAbstract
Dossier Editorial
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
AKRICH, M. (1992). The Description of Technical Objects. In: BIJKER, W. E.; LAW, J. (eds.). Shaping Technology / Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 205-224.
ARENDT, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
BARNES, J. (trans.) (1984). Aristotle. Physics. In: The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Vol. 1. Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 315-446.
BECHTEL, W. (1985). Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems. Metaphilosophy 16, n. 4, p. 296-306.
BORGMANN, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press.
BREY, P. (2000). Theories of technology as extension of human faculties. In: MITCHAM, C. (ed.). Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 19. Amsterdam, JAI, p. 59-78.
CASSIRER, E. (1985). Symbol, Technik, Sprache. Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1927-1933. Edited by E. W. Orth & J. M. Krois. Hamburg, Meiner.
DARWIN, C. R. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London, John Murray.
DENNETT, D. C. (1997). When HAL kills, who’s to blame? Computer ethics. In: STORK, D. G. (ed.). HAL’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality. Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 351-365.
DIPERT, R. R. (1993). Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
ELLUL, J. (1954). La Technique ou l’Enjeu du Siècle. Paris, Armand Colin.
FEENBERG, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. London/New York, Routledge.
FISCHER, P. (2004). Philosophie der Technik. München, Wilhelm Fink (UTB).
FLORIDI, L.; SANDERS, J. W. (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14, n. 3, p. 349-379.
FRANSSEN, M.; KROES, P.; REYDON, T. A. C.; VERMAAS, P. E. (eds.) (2014). Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-Made World. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, Springer.
FREEMAN, K. (1948). Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
HANSSON, S. O. (2004). Philosophical Perspectives on Risk. Techné 8, n. 1, p. 10-35.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1977). The Question concerning Technology. In: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. by William Lovitt. New York, Harper and Row, p. 3-35. (Pub. Orig. 1954 as Die Frage nach der Technik. In: Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen, Günther Neske.)
HORKHEIMER, M.; ADORNO, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Ed. by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. Trans. by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford, Stanford University Press. (Pub. Orig. 1947 as Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam, Querido Verlag.)
HOUKES, W.; VERMAAS, P. E. (2004). Actions versus functions: A plea for an alternative metaphysics of artefacts. The Monist 87, p. 52-71.
HOYNINGEN-HUENE, P. (2008). Systematicity: The nature of science. Philosophia 36, p. 167-180.
IHDE, D. (1979). Technics and Praxis. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel.
KAPLAN, D. M. (ed.) (2004). Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.
KROES, P.; MEIJERS, A. (eds.) (2006). The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37, n. 1, p. 1-158.
KUHN, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
LAWSON, C. (2008). An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions. Technè 12, n. 1, p. 48-64.
MORGAN, M. H. (trans.) (1914). Vitruvius. The Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
NEWMAN, W. R. (2004). Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
NYE, D. E. (2006). Technology Matters: Questions to Live With. Cambridge, MIT Press.
PARRY, R. (2014). “Episteme and techne”. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2014 Edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/episteme-techne/.
ROSS, W. D. (ed.) (1998). Aristotle. Physics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
SCHOFIELD, M. (ed.) (2016). Plato. Laws. Trans. by T. Griffith. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
SCHUMMER, J. (2001). Aristotle on technology and nature. Philosophia Naturalis 38, p. 105-120.
SELLARS, W. (1962). Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man. In: COLODNY, R. (ed.). Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, p. 35-78.
SOAVI, M. (2009). Realism and Artifact Kinds. In: KROHS, U.; KROES, P. (eds.). Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 185-202.
THOMASSON, A. L. (2003). Realism and Human Kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67, n. 3, p. 580-609.
VAN DEN BELD, H. (2009). Philosophy of biotechnology. In: MEIJERS, A. W. M. (ed.). Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 9. Amsterdam, North Holland, p. 1302-1340.
VERBEEK, P.-P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.
WATERFIELD, R. (trans.) (2008). Plato. Timaeus and Critias. With introduction and notes by A. Gregory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
WHITNEY, E. (1990). Paradise Restored: The Mechanical Arts From Antiquity Through the Thirteenth Century. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 80. Philadelphia, The American Philosophical Society.
WINNER, L. (1983). Techné and Politeia: The Technical Constitution of Society. In: DURBIN, P. T.; RAPP, F. (eds.). Philosophy and Technology. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 80. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel, p. 97-111.
ARENDT, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
BARNES, J. (trans.) (1984). Aristotle. Physics. In: The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. Vol. 1. Princeton, Princeton University Press, p. 315-446.
BECHTEL, W. (1985). Attributing Responsibility to Computer Systems. Metaphilosophy 16, n. 4, p. 296-306.
BORGMANN, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. A Philosophical Inquiry. Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press.
BREY, P. (2000). Theories of technology as extension of human faculties. In: MITCHAM, C. (ed.). Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Technology. Research in Philosophy and Technology, Vol. 19. Amsterdam, JAI, p. 59-78.
CASSIRER, E. (1985). Symbol, Technik, Sprache. Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1927-1933. Edited by E. W. Orth & J. M. Krois. Hamburg, Meiner.
DARWIN, C. R. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London, John Murray.
DENNETT, D. C. (1997). When HAL kills, who’s to blame? Computer ethics. In: STORK, D. G. (ed.). HAL’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality. Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 351-365.
DIPERT, R. R. (1993). Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
ELLUL, J. (1954). La Technique ou l’Enjeu du Siècle. Paris, Armand Colin.
FEENBERG, A. (1999). Questioning Technology. London/New York, Routledge.
FISCHER, P. (2004). Philosophie der Technik. München, Wilhelm Fink (UTB).
FLORIDI, L.; SANDERS, J. W. (2004). On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14, n. 3, p. 349-379.
FRANSSEN, M.; KROES, P.; REYDON, T. A. C.; VERMAAS, P. E. (eds.) (2014). Artefact Kinds: Ontology and the Human-Made World. Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, Springer.
FREEMAN, K. (1948). Ancilla to the Pre-Socratic Philosophers. A complete translation of the Fragments in Diels, Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
HANSSON, S. O. (2004). Philosophical Perspectives on Risk. Techné 8, n. 1, p. 10-35.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1977). The Question concerning Technology. In: The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Trans. by William Lovitt. New York, Harper and Row, p. 3-35. (Pub. Orig. 1954 as Die Frage nach der Technik. In: Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfullingen, Günther Neske.)
HORKHEIMER, M.; ADORNO, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Ed. by Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. Trans. by Edmund Jephcott. Stanford, Stanford University Press. (Pub. Orig. 1947 as Dialektik der Aufklärung: Philosophische Fragmente. Amsterdam, Querido Verlag.)
HOUKES, W.; VERMAAS, P. E. (2004). Actions versus functions: A plea for an alternative metaphysics of artefacts. The Monist 87, p. 52-71.
HOYNINGEN-HUENE, P. (2008). Systematicity: The nature of science. Philosophia 36, p. 167-180.
IHDE, D. (1979). Technics and Praxis. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel.
KAPLAN, D. M. (ed.) (2004). Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.
KROES, P.; MEIJERS, A. (eds.) (2006). The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37, n. 1, p. 1-158.
KUHN, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
LAWSON, C. (2008). An Ontology of Technology: Artefacts, Relations and Functions. Technè 12, n. 1, p. 48-64.
MORGAN, M. H. (trans.) (1914). Vitruvius. The Ten Books on Architecture. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
NEWMAN, W. R. (2004). Promethean Ambitions: Alchemy and the Quest to Perfect Nature. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
NYE, D. E. (2006). Technology Matters: Questions to Live With. Cambridge, MIT Press.
PARRY, R. (2014). “Episteme and techne”. In: ZALTA, E. N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2014 Edition. Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/episteme-techne/.
ROSS, W. D. (ed.) (1998). Aristotle. Physics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
SCHOFIELD, M. (ed.) (2016). Plato. Laws. Trans. by T. Griffith. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
SCHUMMER, J. (2001). Aristotle on technology and nature. Philosophia Naturalis 38, p. 105-120.
SELLARS, W. (1962). Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man. In: COLODNY, R. (ed.). Frontiers of Science and Philosophy. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, p. 35-78.
SOAVI, M. (2009). Realism and Artifact Kinds. In: KROHS, U.; KROES, P. (eds.). Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Cambridge, MIT Press, p. 185-202.
THOMASSON, A. L. (2003). Realism and Human Kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67, n. 3, p. 580-609.
VAN DEN BELD, H. (2009). Philosophy of biotechnology. In: MEIJERS, A. W. M. (ed.). Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 9. Amsterdam, North Holland, p. 1302-1340.
VERBEEK, P.-P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.
WATERFIELD, R. (trans.) (2008). Plato. Timaeus and Critias. With introduction and notes by A. Gregory. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
WHITNEY, E. (1990). Paradise Restored: The Mechanical Arts From Antiquity Through the Thirteenth Century. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. Vol. 80. Philadelphia, The American Philosophical Society.
WINNER, L. (1983). Techné and Politeia: The Technical Constitution of Society. In: DURBIN, P. T.; RAPP, F. (eds.). Philosophy and Technology. Boston studies in the philosophy of science. Vol. 80. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel, p. 97-111.
![Archai 29 (2020 [2])](https://periodicos.unb.br/public/journals/2/cover_issue_1986_en_US.png)
Downloads
Published
2020-03-28
How to Cite
Postiglione, E. (2020). Ancient Perspectives on Technology. Revista Archai, (29), e02901. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/30360
Issue
Section
Editorial
License
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
