Phaedo 62b
the prohibition of suicide and the enigma of the phrourá
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_28_3Keywords:
Religion, philosophy, suicide, ethics, semantics of warAbstract
At the end of the Phaedo’s prologue (61b-63b), there is a tension between the desire for death and the prohibition against suicide understood by Kebes as an absolute nonsense. However, what is shown as an absurdity is, in fact, the platonic tool used to introduce some of the grand themes that will be approached in the dialogue. It will be outlined, in a curious thread of mythos and logos, a crucial point that echoes throughout the rest of the dialogue and has enormous effect on the later religious and philosophical thought: it is precisely the passage 62b, in which is said that “we men are in a kind of phrourá”. How can we understand this sentence, whose obscurity is attested by Socrates himself? It seems that the comprehension of this passage depends on the interpretation and thus the translation of the word ‘phrourá’. What does it mean afterall, prison, jail, custody, garrison or guard duty? Due to the many controversies that this word has been raising since the Antiquity, and believing that this debate is far from ending, this article has the objective of not only analyzing the semantics of this word, but also articulating it with the passage in which it is found. And the background: a particular religious viewpoint that defends the divine as man’s caretaker. Finally, we hope that this debate will stimulate new researches and fruitful reflections on the platonic philosophy.
Downloads
References
BERNABÉ, A. (2011). Platão e o orfismo: diálogos entre religião e filosofia. Trad. Dennys Garcia Xavier. São Paulo, Annablume Clássica.
BOSTOCK, D. (2002). Plato’s Phaedo. 2ed. New York, Oxford University Press. (1ed 1986)
BORGES DE ARAUJO JR., A. (2007). Corpo obstáculo, corpo possibilidade: um comentário ao Fédon de Platão. https://www3.ufpe.br/ppgfilosofia/images/pdf/corpo%20obstculo%20e%20corpo%20possibilidade.pdf. Acessado em: 02/05/2016.
BRANDÃO, J. S. (2010). Mitologia Grega. Vol. 1. 22ed. Rio de Janeiro, Vozes. (1ed 1986)
BURGER, R. (1984). The Phaedo: A Platonic Labyrinth. New Haven, Yale University Press.
BURNET, J. (1892). Early Greek Philosophy. London/Edinburgh, Adam and Charles Black.
BURNET, J. (1911). Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CHANTRAINE, P. (1968). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire de mots. Paris, Klincksieck.
COURCELLE, P. (1965). Tradition platonicienne et tradition chrétienne du corps-prison. Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belle-Lettres 2, p. 341-344.
COURCELLE, P. (1974). Connais-toi toi-même : de Socrate à saint Bernard. Tome 2. Paris, Études augustiniennes.
DI GIUSEPPE, R. (1993). La Teoria della Morte nel Fedone Platonico. Napoli, Società Editrice il Mulino.
DIXSAUT, M. (1991). Platon. Phédon. Paris, GF Flammarion.
DORTER, K. (1982). Plato’s Phaedo: An Interpretation. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
GALLOP, D. (2009). Plato. Phaedo. New York, Oxford University Press.
GERTZ, S. R. P. (2011). Death and Immortality in Ancient Neoplatonism. Studies on the Ancient Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Boston, Brill.
GRUBE, G. M. A. (2002). Plato. Five Dialogues ”“ Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo. 2ed. Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing Company.
GUTHRIE, W. K. C. (1975). A History of Greek Philosophy. Vol. 4: Plato: The man and his dialogues: earlier period. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
HACKFORTH, R. (2011). Plato’s Phaedo. 11ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. (1ed 1955)
KURY, M. G. (1988). Heródoto. Histórias. Tradução, introdução e notas. Brasília, Editora Universidade de Brasília.
KURY, M. G. (2008). Diógenes Laércio. Vidas e Doutrinas dos Filósofos Ilustres. Tradução do grego, introdução e notas. 2ed. Brasília, Editora Universidade de Brasília. (1ed 1988)
LAMB, W. R. M. (2005). Plato. Alcibiades I. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
LIDDELL, H. G.; et. al. (2010). An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon. 7ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
NUNES, C. A. (2011). Platão. Fédon. Tradução e introdução. 3ed. Belém, Editora Universitária UFPA. (1ed 2002)
NUNES, C. A. (trad.) (2001). Platão. Crátilo ”“ Teeteto. Belém, Editoria Universitária UFPA.
NUNES, C. A. (2011). Homero. Ilíada. Tradução e introdução. São Paulo, Editora Hedra.
RIBEIRO, L. F. B. (2009). Antifonte. Testemunhos e fragmentos. Edição e tradução. São Paulo, Loyola.
ROUX, G.; ROUX, J. (1961). À propos de Platon: réflexions en marge du Phédon (62b) et du Banquet. Revue de Philologie, de littérature et d’histoire ancienne 35, p. 207-234.
SCHIAPPA DE AZEVEDO, M. T. (1988). Platão. Fédon. Tradução, introdução e notas. 2ed. Coimbra, Livraria Minerva.
TAYLOR, A. E. (2001). Plato: The Man and His Work. 4ed. New York, Dover Publications. (1ed. 1926)
WESTERINK, L. G. (2009). Damascius. Commentary on Plato’s Phaedo. 2ed. London, The Prometheus Trust. (1ed 1977)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.