The Failure of Philosophical Love
A Reading on Plato’s Symposium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_24_4Keywords:
Plato's Symposium, Platonic love, Eros, philosophical logosAbstract
In this paper I argue that Socrates' speech in Plato’s Symposium cannot by itself express Plato’s view of love. All the non-philosophical speeches, each standing for a different contemporary view of love, should be taken into serious consideration, for they are not mere pastiches of empty theories. In fact, they seem to have been placed there to have their intellectual strength tested by philosophy, for not only their contents reveal commonsensical accepted wisdom, but their discursive beauty powerfully impresses the audience, making them true challenges to the cold, though persuasive logos of philosophy. Furthermore, placing Alcibiades' speech right after Diotima’s austere account of love, when the program of speeches as proposed seemed to have arrived at an end, would be unnecessary, if Plato’s aim were simply to disapprove Alcibiades’ behavior to excuse Socrates political attitudes, as it is assumed by Leon Robin in his Notice to his famous translation to the Belles Lettres edition. On the contrary, Alcibiades’ speech sounds more like a criticism of Socratic love made by Plato himself.
Downloads
References
BRISSON, L. (1998). Platon. Le Banquet. Trad. Luc Brisson. Paris, GF-Flammarion.
BURY, R. G. (1969). The Symposium of Plato. Edited with introduction, critical notes and commentary. Cambridge, W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.
CHAMBRY, P. (1967). Xenophon. Oeuvres Complètes. Traduction, notices et notes. Paris, Garnier-Flammarion.
DIELS, H., KRANZ, W (1903). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (griechisch und deutsch). Berlin, Weidmannsche buchhandlung.
DIXSAUT, M. (1985). Le Naturel Philosophe. Essai sur les Dialogues de Platon. Paris, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
DOVER, K. (1980). Plato’s Symposium. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
FRAISSE, J.-C. (1984). Philia. La notion d'amitié dans la Philosophie Antique. Essai sur un problème perdu et retrouvé. Paris, J. Vrin.
FRANCO, I. F. (1988). Os Fundamentos da Philía Socrática ”” uma análise do Lysis. Revista Filosófica Brasileira 4, n. 3, p. 49-66.
FRANCO, I. F. (2006). O Sopro do Amor. Um comentário ao discurso de Fedro no Banquete de Platão. Rio de Janeiro, Palimpsesto Editora.
FRIEDLÄNDER, P. (1969). Plato. Trad. Hans Meyerhoff, vol. I: An Introduction, vol II: The Dialogues, First Period. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
MARKUS, R. A. (1971). The Dialectic of Eros in Plato's Symposium. In: VLASTOS, G. (ed.). Plato: A Collection of Critical Essays, vol. II. University of Notre Dame Press, p. 132-143.
NUSSBAUM, M. (2001). The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. 2 ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
PELLEGRIN P. (2014). Aristote. Oeuvres Complètes. Paris, Flammarion.
ROBIN, L. (1908). La théorie platonicienne de l'amour. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France. (1964 reprint)
ROBIN, L. (1929). Platon. Oeuvres Complètes. Tome IV, 2ème. partie: Le Banquet. Notice. Texte établi et traduit par Paul Vicaire. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. (1989 reprint)
ROBIN, L. (1940-1942). Platon. Oeuvres Complètes. Tome II Traduit par Léon Robin, avec la collaboration de Joseph Moreau. Paris, Pléïade.
ROSS, D. (1984). The Works of Aristotle Translated into English. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
VLASTOS, G. (1981). The Individual as an Object of Love in Plato. In: Platonic Studies, 2nd printing, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
YEBRA, V. G. (1990). ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΟΥΣ ΤΑ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΑ ΜΕΤΑ ΤΑ ΦΥΣΙΚΑ. Aristotelis Metaphysica. Metafísica de Aristóteles. Ed. Trilingüe, Yebra. 2 ed. Revisada. Madrid, Editorial Gredos.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
