Advancing Forensic Science in Kazakhstan
The Emergence and Impact of Digital Forensics in Cybercrime Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v16i2.49190Schlagworte:
Digital Forensic Methodologies. Kazakhstan Cybercrime Legislation. Forensic Science Evolution. Cybersecurity Legal Implications. Technological Evidence Analysis.Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of the article was to study digital forensics, its role in the Kazakh legal system and the process of investigating cybercrime.
[Methodology] Analysis, synthesis, comparison, deduction, generalization, abstraction, formal legal methods of scientific research were used.
[Findings] A result, it was proved that forensics is an indispensable component of the future development of forensic science in Kazakhstan. It has been established that digital forensics enables speeding up the process of solving cybercrimes, as well as determining their sources and prerequisites. Thus, on the basis of forensics, it is possible not only to identify the problem, but also to form a mechanism for overcoming it in the future. This determines the priority of professional training of forensic experts for future work with digital evidence, traces and their use in the trial. In addition, the areas of activity of law enforcement agencies has been established, in which forensics plays an important role and is mandatory for use.
Downloads
Literaturhinweise
ADANBEKOVA, Z., OMAROVA, A. B., YERMUKHAMETOVA, S., ASSANOVA, S., & TYNYBEKOV, S. (2022). Features of an Electronic Transaction as Evidence in Court. Revista de Direito, Estado e Tele-comunicacoes, 14(1), 98-112.
ALGHAMDIL, M. I. (2021). Cybersecurity threats with new perspectives. Lon-don: Intech Open.
ALTAEV, E. A., UMIRZHANOV, T. W., & KANATBAEV, T. K. (2023). Pro-spects for the development of forensic science in the Republic of Ka-zakhstan. Economy, Management, Law: Current Issues and Vectors of Development, 10, 21-25.
AMATO, F., CASTINGLIONE, A., COZZOLINO, G., & NARDUCCI, F. (2020). A semantic-based methodology for digital forensics analysis. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 138, 172-177.
AUBAKIROVA, A. A., ILDEBAYEV, R. E., BEGALIYEV, Y. N., TUMANS-HIYEV, R. K., & ALIMANOVA, E. A. (2022). Forensic investigation of forged educational documents. International Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 14(3), 274-288.
BAZILOVA, A. A., MALIKOVA, S. B., OMAROVA, A. B., ATAKHANOVA, G. M., & DAUBASSOV, S. S. (2016). Disadvantages in differentiation and exceeding limits of necessary defense according to the legislation of the republic of kazakhstan. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 7(4), 752-758.
BOCHELIUK, V. Y., SPYTSKA, L. V., SHAPOSHNYKOVA, I. V., TURUBA-ROVA, A. V., & PANOV, M. S. (2022). Five stages of professional per-sonality development: Comparative analysis. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 53(2), 88-93.
BORYSENKO, I. V., BULULUKOV, O. Y., PCHOLKIN, V. D., BARANCHYK, V. V., & PRYHODKO, V. O. (2021). The modern development of new promising fields in forensic examinations. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 7(4), 137-144.
CASINO, F., DASAKLIS, T. K., SPATHOULAS, G., ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, M., GHOSAL, A., BOROCZ, I., & PATSAKIS, C. (2022). Research trends, challenges, and emerging topics in digital forensics: A review of re-views. IEEE Access, 10, 64-93.
CHERNIAVSKYI, S., VOZNIUK, A., & HRIBOV, M. (2023). Legality of tradi-tional techniques, means and modern technologies of visual surveil-lance. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 28(1), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/1.2023.09
CHORNOUS, YU., & LELIUK, T. (2023). Organization of forensic examina-tions in criminal proceedings as a condition for the effectiveness of the investigation of criminal offences. Law Journal of the National Acad-emy of Internal Affairs, 13(2), 50-62. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-chasopis/2.2023.50
CHUKAIEVA, А., & MATULIENĖ, S. (2023). Possibilities of applying artificial intelligence in the work of law enforcement agencies. Scientific Jour-nal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 28(3), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.56215/naia-herald/3.2023.28
Criminal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2014). https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000226
DANYLKOVYCH, A., SANGINOVA, O., & SHAKHNOVSKY, A. (2023). Com-puter simulation and optimization of the composition of the hydro-phobising mixture. Bulletin of Cherkasy State Technological Universi-ty, (2), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.24025/2306-4412.2.2023.277295
Du, X., HARGREAVES, C., SHEPPARD, J., ANDA, F., SAYAKKARA, A., LE-KHAC, N. A., & SCANLON, M. (2020). SoK: Exploring the state of the art and the future potential of artificial intelligence in digital forensic investigation. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (pp. 1-10). New York: Associa-tion for Computing Machinery.
Forensic Kazakhstan. 2022. https://forensic.kz
How Kazakhstanis are deceived by Internet scammers. (2022). https://kapital.kz/gosudarstvo/102872/kak-kazakhstantsev-obmanyvayut-internet-moshenniki.html
JARRETT, A., & CHOO, K. K. R. (2021). The impact of automation and artifi-cial intelligence on digital forensics. WIREs Forensic Science, 3(6), e1418.
JONES, G. M., & WINSTER, S. G. (2022). An insight into digital forensics: Histo-ry, frameworks, types and tools. In: Cyber Security and Digital Foren-sics (pp. 105-125). Beverly: Scrivener Publishing.
KARAGIANNIS, C., & VERGIDIK, K. (2021). Digital evidence and cloud foren-sics: Contemporary legal challenges and the power of disposal. Infor-mation, 12(5), 181.
KAVRESTAD, J. (2020). Fundamentals of digital forensics. Abington: Springer International Publishing.
KEMALI, E. S., & ZHURSIMBAEV, S. K. (2020). Some problems of criminalis-tics in the light of today. Scientific and Legal Journal of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 1(59), 1-7.
KHUSANOV, A. (2022). Prospects for the development of the forensic service. Society and Innovation, 3(2), 31-39.
LAKBAYEV, K. S., RYSMAGAMBRTOVA, G. M., UMETOV, A. U., & SYS-OYEV, A. K. (2020). The crimes in the field of high technology: Con-cept, problems and methods of counteraction in Kazakhstan. Interna-tional Journal of Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 12(4), 412-423.
MENTUKH, N., & SHEVCHUK, O. (2023). Protection of information in elec-tronic registers: Comparative and legal aspect. Law, Policy and Securi-ty, 1(1), 4-17.
METELSKYI, I., & KRAVCHUK, M. (2023). Features of cybercrime and its prevalence in Ukraine. Law, Policy and Security, 1(1), 18-25.
MOUSTAFA, N. (2022). Digital forensics in the era of artificial intelligence. Abington: CRC Press.
QADIAR, A. M., & VAROL, A. (2020). The role of machine learning in digital forensics. In: Proceedings of the (2020) 8th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS) (pp. 1-5). Beirut: IEEE.
SILVARAJOO, V. R., LIM, S. Y., & DAUD, P. (2021). Digital evidence case management tool for collaborative digital forensics investigation. In: Proceedings of the (2021) 3rd International Cyber Resilience Confer-ence (CRC) (pp. 1-4). Langkawi Island: IEEE.
SUN, D., ZHANG, X., CHOO, K. K. R., Hu, L., & WANG, F. (2021). NLP-based digital forensic investigation platform for online communications. Computers & Security, 104, 102210.
SUNDE, N., & DROR, I. E. (2021). A hierarchy of expert performance (HEP) applied to digital forensics: Reliability and biasability in digital foren-sics decision making. Forensic Science International: Digital Investi-gation, 37, 301175.
TOLEUBEKOVA, B. H., & KHVEDELIDZE, T. B. (2022). Features of imple-mentation of the concept of anti-corruption policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan for (2022-2026) by higher education institutions under the conditions of introducing digital technologies. Bulletin of Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, 67(1), 26-33.
Wu, T., BREITINGER, F., & O’SHAUGHNESSY, S. (2020). Digital forensic tools: Recent advances and enhancing the status quo. Forensic Sci-ence International: Digital Investigation, 34, 300999.
YAACOUB, J. P. A., NOURA, H. N., SALMAN, O., & CHEHAB, A. (2022). Advanced digital forensics and anti-digital forensics for IoT systems: Techniques, limitations and recommendations. Internet of Things, 19, 100544.
Downloads
Veröffentlicht
Zitationsvorschlag
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Lizenz
Copyright (c) 2024 Law, State and Telecommunications Review
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.
By submitting this paper to the Law, State and Telecommunications Review,
I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
