A proteção do direito fundamental à água em perspectiva internacional e comparada

Autores

  • Carlos Bernal Pulido Macquarie University Law School

Palavras-chave:

direito fundamental à água, direito comparado, princípio da razoabilidade, mínimo vital, princípio da proporcionalidade

Resumo

Propósito ”“ Análise da aplicação judicial do direito fundamental à água e suas implicações teóricas e práticas em direito comparado.

Metodologia/abordagem/design ”“ Análise teórica e jurisprudencial dos critérios argumentativos utilizados em cortes de diferentes países para aplicação do direito fundamental à água.

Resultados ”“ Vantagens e desvantagens da utilização do princípio da razoabilidade, do mínimo vital e da proporcionalidade como parâmetros para julgamentos envolvendo o direito constitucional à água.

Implicações práticas ”“ O artigo demonstra que o princípio da proporcionalidade detém vantagens comparativas no que toca a julgamentos envolvendo o direito fundamental à água.

Originalidade/relevância do texto ”“ O artigo supre uma lacuna de estudos sobre o tema, especialmente diante dos problemas decorrentes de crises hídricas localizadas ou disputas econômicas, sociais ou jurídicas pelo uso da água em cenários de escassez do bem.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Carlos Bernal Pulido, Macquarie University Law School

Professor Associado da Macquarie Law School (Sydney, Austrália). Bacharel em Direito pela Universidad Externado de Colombia. Doutor em Direito pela Universidad de Salamanca, com Mestrado e Doutorado em Filosofia pela Universidad de la Florida.

Referências

Thomas Alexander Aleinikoff, Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing, 96 The Yale Law Journal (1987) 943 s.
Robert Alexy, A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Robert Alexy, On Constitutional Rights to Protection, 3 Legisprudence (2009) 1 s.
T. R. S. Allan, Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Rodolfo Arango, Basic Social Rights, Constitutional Justice, and Democracy, 16 (2) Ratio Juris (2003) 143 s.
Aharon Barak, Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Carlos Bernal, El princípio de proporcionalidade y los direitos fundamentales (Madrid, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 3ª Edición, 2007).
Carlos Bernal, El derecho fundamental al água y su intrincada satisfacción, 17 (1) Letras Jurídicas (2012) 23 s.
David Bilchitz, Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Jacco Bomhoff, Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse, 1 (4) Law & Ethics of Human Rights (2010) 108 s.
Xenophon Contiades y Almene Fotiadou, Social Rights in the Age of Proportionality: Global Economic Crisis and Constitutional Ligitation, 10 (3) International Journal of Constitutional Law (2012) 660 s.
Ronald Dworkin, Hard Cases, 88 (6) Harvard Law Review (1975) 1057 s.
Jon Elster, Introduction, in Id. (ed), Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998) 8 s.
Varun Gauri e Daniel M. Brinks, Introduction: The Elements of Legalization and the Triangular Shape of Social and Economic Rights, in: Varun Gauri e Daniel M. Brinks (eds.), Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) 2 s.
Amy Gutma y Dennis Thompson, Why Deliberative Democracy (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2004) 3 s.
Jürgen Habermas, Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1996).
Troy Jollimore, Impartiality, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2011). Disponível em: <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/impartiality/> (Acesso em 9 de setembro de 2013).
Jeff King, Judging Social Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Matthias Klatt y Johannes Schmidt, Epistemic Discretion in Constitutional Law, 1 (10) International Journal of Constitucional Law (2012) 69 s.
Martin Krygier, Rule of Law, in: Michel Rosenfeld e András Sajó (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), 235 s.
Mattias Kumm, What Do You Have in Virtue of Having a Constitutional Right? On the Place and Limits of Proportionality Requirements, in: George Pavlakos (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007) 131 s.
Mattias Kumm, The Idea of Socratic Constestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review, 1 (4) Law and Ethics in Human Rights (2010) 142 s.
David Landau, The reality of Social Rights Enforcement, 53 Harvard International Law Journal (2012) 190 s.
David Landau, The Promise of a Minimum Core Approach: The Colombian Model for Judicial Review of Austerity Measures, in: Aoife Nolan (ed.), Economic and Social Rights after the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge, CUP, no prelo, 2014).
Malcolm Langford y Anna Russell, Global Precedent or Reasonable No More?: the Mazibuko case, 19 Water Law (2008) 73 s.
Ligia Alba Melo e Jorge Enrique Ramos, Algunos aspectos fiscales y financieros del sistema de saúde en Colombia, 624 Borradores de economía, (2010) 1 s.
Frank I. Michelman, Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away, 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law (2008) 667 s.
Kai Möller, Proportionality: Challenging the Critics, 3 (10) International Journal of Constitutional Law (2012) 717 s.
Sharmila L Murthy, Mark Williams e Elisha Baskin, The Human Right to Water in Israel: A Case Study of the Unrecognised Bedouin Villages in the Negev, 46 (1) Israel Law Review (2013) 25-59.
Paul O’Connell, The Death of Socio-Economic Rights, 74 (4) Modern Law Review (2011) 532 s.
Carles-Maxime Panaccio, In Defence of Two-Step Balancing and Proportionality in Rights Adjudication, 24 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence (2011) 109 s.
John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York, N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 1993).
Julian Rivers, Proportionality and Discretion in International and European Law”, in: N. Tsagourias (ed.), Transnational Constitutionalism: International and Euroepan Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007) 108 s.
Anna F. S. Russell, International Organizations and Human Rights: Realizing, Resisting or Repackaging the Right to Water? 9 (1) Journal of Human Rights (2010) 1 s.
Anna F. S. Russell, Incorporating Social Rights in Development: Transnational Corporations and the Right to Water, 7 International Journal of Law in Context (2011) 1 s.
Bernhard Schlink, Proportionality (1), in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Michel Rosenfeld e András Sajó (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) 721 s.
Stavros Tsakyrakis, Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights, 3 (7) International Journal of Constitutional Law (2009) 468 s.
Grégoire Webber, Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights Scholarship, 23 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence (2010) 180 s.
Grégoire Webber, The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Murray Wesson, Reasonableness in Retreat? The Judgment of the South African Constitutional Court in Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg, 11 (2) Human Rights Law Review (2011) 400 s.
Alicia E. Yamin e Oscar, Parra-Vera, How Do Courts Set Health Policy? The Case of the Colombian Constitutional Court, 6 (2) PLoS Med (2009) 147 s.
Katherine Young, Constituting Economic and Social Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

Downloads

Publicado

2015-10-12

Como Citar

PULIDO, Carlos Bernal. A proteção do direito fundamental à água em perspectiva internacional e comparada. Journal of Law and Regulation, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 1–38, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rdsr/article/view/19282. Acesso em: 17 maio. 2024.