Agroecology and ecosystem services in the Latin American context: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33240/rba.v19i3.53881Keywords:
Agroecosystems, Biodiversity, Food security, climate changeAbstract
This study presents the results of a systematic review of the literature on agroecology and sustainable agroecosystems, with a focus on guaranteeing food security and maintaining ecosystem services in Latin America. Twenty-six articles in the Scopus database focusing on agroecological practices and ecosystem services were analyzed. The results revealed a growing interest in the subject of agroecology, especially in Brazil. The topics covered in the articles included food security in the face of climate change, biodiversity conservation and sustainable land management. It is concluded that sustainable agroecosystems play a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem functions and services, thus contributing to achieving the goals of the Sustainable Development Goals established by the ONU in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Downloads
References
ALTIERI, Miguel A. Agroecologia: as bases científicas da agricultura alternativa. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: PTA- FASE. 1989. 240p.
CARVALHO, Ricardo S. et al. Plant extracts in agriculture and their applications in the treatment of seeds. Ciência Rural, v. 52, n. 5, p. e20210245, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210245.
CORNEJO-DENMAN, Lara; ROMO-LEON, Jose Raul; LUTZ-LEY, America N. Traditional agricultural practices and their contribution to habitat quality and carbon storage in arid Northwest Mexico: a social-ecological approach in the Rio Sonora sub-watershed. Ecology and Society, v. 28, n. 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13676-280118.
CORRÊA, Carina Júlia P. et al. Urban Gardens’ Potential to Improve Stormwater Management: A Comparative Analysis among Urban Soils in Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 5, p. 2965, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052965.
COSTANZA, Robert et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, v. 387, n. 6630, p. 253-260, 1997. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/387253a0. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2024.
DAGUNGA, Gilbert et al. Agroecology and resilience of smallholder food security: A systematic review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 7, p. 1267630, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1267630.
DALY, Herman E.; FARLEY, Joshua. Ecological economics: principles and practice. Washington, DC: Island Press, 454 p, 2004.
DE GROOT, Rudolf S. et al. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological complexity, v. 7, n. 3, p. 260-272, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
DE SOUZA, Helton N.; DE GRAAFF, Jan; PULLEMAN, Mirjam M. Strategies and economics of farming systems with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. Agroforestry systems, v. 84, p. 227-242, 2012. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9452-x. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2024.
DIAS, Lívia C. P. et al. Patterns of land use, extensification, and intensification of Brazilian agriculture. Global change biology, v. 22, n. 8, p. 2887-2903, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13314.
EAKIN, Hallie et al. Identifying attributes of food system sustainability: emerging themes and consensus. Agriculture and human values, v. 34, n. 3, p. 757-773, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9754-8
EEA (European Environment Agency). 2021. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES, Version 5.1).
ESCOBAR, Natalia et al. Identification of functional groups of insects associated with family agricultural production systems in the province of Sumapáz, Colombia. Bol. Cient. Mus. Hist. Nat. Univ. Caldas, 26(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.17151/bccm.2022.26.1.
FEIDEN, Alberto. Agroecologia: introdução e conceitos. In: DE AQUINO, A. M.; DE ASSIS, R. L. (Org.). Agroecologia: princípios e técnicas para uma agricultura orgânica sustentável. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, p.517, 2005.
FLORA, Cornelia B., BAIN, Carmen, CALL, Caleb. Sustainability Standards and Their Implications for Agroecology. In: Campbell, W., López Ortíz, S. (Eds) Integrating Agriculture, Conservation and Ecotourism: Societal Influences. Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. 2012.
FOLEY, Jonathan A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, v. 309, n. 5734. p. 570-574, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772.
FRANCIS, Charles et al. Agroecology: The ecology of food systems. Journal of sustainable agriculture,v. 22, n. 3, p. 99-118, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J064v22n03_10.
GIRALDO, Omar Felipe; ROSSET, Peter M. Agroecology as a territory in dispute: Between institutionality and social movements. The Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 45, n. 3, p. 545-564, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1353496.
GLIESSMAN, Stephen R. Agroecología: procesos ecológicos en agricultura sostenible. Turrialba: Catie, 2002
HARTERREITEN-SOUZA, Erica S. et al. The role of integrating agroforestry and vegetable planting in structuring communities of herbivorous insects and their natural enemies in the Neotropical region. Agroforestry Systems, v. 88, p. 205-219, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9666-1.
INSFRÁN ORTIZ, Amado; REY BENAYAS, José María; CAYUELA DELGADO, Luís. Agroforestry improves soil fauna abundance and composition in the Atlantic Forest of Paraguay. Agroforestry Systems, v. 97, n. 8, p. 1447-1463, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00869-5.
KEARNEY, Sean P. et al. Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies from slash-and-mulch agroforestry systems in El Salvador. Ecological indicators, v. 105, p. 264-278, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.032.
KINNEEN, Lois et al. Silvopastoral systems benefit invertebrate biodiversity on tropical livestock farms in Caquetá, Colombia. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, v. 26, n. 1, p. 126-134, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12594.
L. RESQUE, Antonio Gabriel et al. Agrobiodiversity and Public Food Procurement Programs in Brazil: Influence of Local Stakeholders in Configuring Green Mediated Markets. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 5, pág. 1425, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051425.
LEFF, Enrique. Agroecologia e saber ambiental. Agroecologia e desenvolvimento rural sustentável, v. 3, n. 1, p. 36-51, 2002. Disponível em: https://www.projetovidanocampo.com.br/agroecologia/agroecologia_e_saber_ambiental.pdf. Acesso em: 19 ago. 2024.
LI, Kevin; VANDERMEER, John H.; PERFECTO, Ivette. Disentangling endogenous versus exogenous pattern formation in spatial ecology: a case study of the ant Azteca sericeasur in southern Mexico. Royal Society open science, v. 3, n. 5, p. 160073, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160073.
LORENZÓN, Rodrigo-E. et al. Can agroecological management increase functional diversity of birds in rice fields?. Revista de Biología Tropical, v. 68, n. 3, p. 873-883, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v68i3.39261.
MEA (MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington, DC, 2005.
MELGAREJO-CARRENO, Vadimir A.; RODRÍGUEZ, Sandra Cecilia Bautista; CAMARGO, Mauricio. Challenges and trends in the valuation of ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems: a systematic revision. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, v. 23, n. 1, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.2665.
MELGAREJO, Vladimir A.; BAUTISTA-RODRÍGUEZ, Sandra Cecilia; PARDO, Mauricio Camargo. Dimensiones y enfoques de valoración de los servicios ecosistémicos en agroecosistemas. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, v. 18, p. 1-22, 2021. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cdr18.devs.
MÉNDEZ, V. Ernesto; SHAPIRO, Elizabeth N.; GILBERT, Gregory S. Cooperative management and its effects on shade tree diversity, soil properties and ecosystem services of coffee plantations in western El Salvador. Agroforestry Systems, v. 76, p. 111-126, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9220-3.
MENEZES NETO, Jayme B.; CAPORAL, Francisco Roberto; DE MATTOS, Jorge Luiz S. Análise comparativa do fluxo de biomassa em sistemas de produção de cana-de-açúcar convencional e orgânico: quantificação energética da produção primária líquida em uma perspectiva agroecológica. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, v. 62, p. 595-616, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v62i0.83476 e-ISSN 2176-9109.
MONTEIRO, Alyce et al. Crop-livestock-forestry systems as a strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing the sustainability of forage-based livestock systems in the Amazon biome. Science of the Total Environment, v. 906, p. 167396, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167396.
MUÑOZ, Angelica M. M.; DE FREITAS, Simone R. Importância dos Serviços Ecossistêmicos nas Cidades: Revisão das Publicações de 2003 a 2015. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, v. 6, n. 2, p. 89-104, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5585/geas.v6i2.853.
ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS – ONU. Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Nações Unidas no Brasil, 2020. Disponível em: https://nacoesunidas.org. Acesso em: 23 de fev. de 2024.
PENGUE, Walter Alberto. Local food systems: Making visible the invisible through urban agroecology. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, v. 4, p. 867691, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.867691.
PEREDO PARADA, Santiago; BARRERA SALAS, Claudia. Multifunctional Plants: Ecosystem Services and Undervalued Knowledge of Biocultural Diversity in Rural Communities—Local Initiatives for Agroecological Transition in Chile. Land, v. 13, n. 1, p. 39, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13010039.
PEREIRA, Adalgisa J. et al. Control of Brevicoryne brassicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with extracts of Agave americana var. Marginata Trel. in Brassica oleracea crops. Annals of Applied Biology, [s.l.], v.174, no.1, p.14–19, 2018. https://doi. org/10.1111/aab.12471.
POWER, Alison G. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: biological sciences, v. 365, n. 1554, p. 2959-2971, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0143.
PRADO Rachel B. Serviços ecossistêmicos e ambientais na agricultura. In: PALHARES, J. C. P.; GEBLER, L. (Ed.). Gestão ambiental na agricultura. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2014. v. 2, cap. 11, p. 413-456.
PRATES JÚNIOR, Paulo et al. Agroecological coffee management increases arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity. PLoS One, v. 14, n. 1, p. e0209093, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209093.
QUISPE, Yésica et al. Agroecología para la seguridad alimentaria y frente al cambio climático en el Perú. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 22(1), 5-29. https://doi. org/10.7201/earn.2022.01.01
RUÍZ ORDOÑEZ, Diana Marcela et al. Mapping Ecosystem Services in an Andean Water Supply Basin. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1793, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031793.
SHARGHI, Tahereh; SEDIGHI, Hassan; EFTEKHARI, Abdolreza R. Effective factors in achieving sustainable agriculture. American journal of agricultural and biological sciences, v. 5, n. 2, p. 235-241, 2010. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2010.235.241.
SANTOS, Rafael S. et al. Consequences of land-use change in Brazil’s new agricultural frontier: A soil physical health assessment. Geoderma, v. 400, p. 115149, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115149.
SAYLOR, Christina R.; ALSHARIF, Kamal A.; TORRES, Hannah. The importance of traditional ecological knowledge in agroecological systems in Peru. International journal of biodiversity science, Ecosystem Services & Management, v. 13, n. 1, p. 150-161, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1285814.
SCHULER, Hanna R. et al. Ecosystem Services from Ecological Agroforestry in Brazil: A Systematic Map of Scientific Evidence. Land , v.11, n. 1, p. 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010083.
SILES, Pablo; CERDÁN, Carlos R.; STAVER, Charles. Smallholder Coffee in the Global Economy—A Framework to Explore Transformation Alternatives of Traditional Agroforestry for Greater Economic, Ecological, and Livelihood Viability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, v. 6, p. 808207, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.808207.
SOUZA, Lisa P. et al. Ecosystem services provided by a complex coastal region: challenges of classification and mapping. Scientific Reports, v. 6, n. 22782, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22782.
TEIXEIRA, Heitor Mancini et al. Understanding farm diversity to promote agroecological transitions. Sustainability, v. 10, n. 12, p. 4337, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124337.
TEIXEIRA, Heitor Mancini et al. Impact of agroecological management on plant diversity and soil-based ecosystem services in pasture and coffee systems in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, v. 305, p. 107171, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107171.
TILMAN, David et al. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, v. 108, n. 50, p. 20260-20264, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108.
TOGNI, Pedro H. B. et al. Brazilian legislation leaning towards fast registration of biological control agents to benefit organic agriculture. Neotropical entomology, v. 48, p. 175-185, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-019-00675-8.
TOMICH, Thomas P. et al. Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, v. 36, p. 193-222, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012110-121302.
WALL, Diana H. et al. Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, 2012.
WEZEL, Alexander et al. Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, v. 40, p. 1-13, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00646-z.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rebeka Aparecida Almeida dos Santos, Leandro Redin Vestena
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of articles published in this journal remains with the authors, with first publication rights for the journal.
License
When published in this open access journal, licensed through CC BY 4.0, articles are distributed free of charge and can be shared and adapted for any purpose, including commercial. As attribution of use, the license requires that due credit be given, with a link to the license and indication of changes. This does not mean that the licensor endorses the use of the information in the article, or the person who used this information. It also implies the impossibility of applying legal or technological measures that restrict the use of the information by third parties.
