Estrategias enunciativas en el discurso irônico: un artículo de opinión de José-Ignacio Cabrujas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35956/v.1.n1.2001.p.83-100Keywords:
Sense. Thematic isotopies. Enunciation strategies. Ironic discourse. Criticism of semantic micro-analysis.Abstract
In the semantic and semiotic analysis of discourse (Paris School and ||y‘ French School of Discourse Analysis), any structural micro or macro unit may constitute a starting point to clarify and reconstruct the architecture of sense. From the lexemes that are responsible for the constitution of thematic and figurative isotopies (Greimas, 1968) in their condition of minimal semantic units of the language System, we propose the explanation and interpretation of an opinion article by JoséIgnacio Cabrujas (Caracas, 1937-1995). We shall analyse the construction mechanisms of the discoursal simulation derived from the instance of enunciation (Benveniste, Greimas and Courtes), which is taken as the macro-structural unit. In this way, we will allow approach the labyrinth paths of saying which, at the same time represent our forms of living (Wittgenstein), asserting, manipulating, acting, making us feel (Searle, Austin, Ducrot, Greimas and Fonteille) and induce us to smile at the ironic distance or the bitter gesture of sarcasm. The semantic density of this ironic discourse will serve as a pretext to maintain our critical position with respect to the difficulties presented by the semantic micro-analysis of discourse.
Downloads
References
Cabrujas, J. I. (1993). El pais según Cabrujas. Caracas: Monte Ávila.
Delorme, J. (1987). Parole, figure et parabole. Lyon: PUL.
Espar, T. (1995). El relato oral como discurso mediador entre este mundo y la otra orilla. Escritos, 11-12, 113-130.
Espar, T. (1998). La semiótica y el discurso literario latinoamericano. Caracas: Monte Ávila.
Floch, J.M. (1995). Identités visuelles. Paris: PUF.
Fontanille, J. (1995). Sémiotique du visible. Paris: PUF.
Fontanille, J. (1996). Ponencia realizada en Colloque sur l’Enonciation dans la lettre. Lyon: Cadir.
Greimas, A. J. (1966). Sémantique Structurale. Paris: Larousse.
Greimas, A. J. (1989). De Pimperfection. Périgueux: Fanlac.
Greimas, A. J. Y CourtéS, J. (1979) Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. Paris: Hachette.
Greimas, A. J. Y CourtéS, J. (1986). Sémiotique. Dictionnaire raisonné de la théorie du langage. (2o ed.). Paris: Hachette.
Greimas, A. J. y Fontanille, J. (1991). Sémiotique des passions. Paris: Seuil.
Jankélevitch, V. (1964). Eironie. Paris: flammarion.
Landowski, E. (1989). La société réflechie. Paris: Seuil.
Oliveira, A.C. de y Landowsky, E. (1995). Do inteligível ao sensível. São Paulo: EDUC.
Panier, L. (1996). Au sujet de la lettre. Ponencia realizada en Colloque sur l’énonciation dans la lettre. Lyon: Cadir.
Pozuelo, J. M. (1992). Teoría del lenguaje literario. Madrid: Cátedra.
Quemada, B. (1993). Greimas lexicologue. N.A.S., 25, Hommages à Greimas. Limoges: Pulim.
Rastier, F. ( 1991). Sémantique et recherches cognitives. Paris: PUF.
Rlcoeur, P (1990). Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
Vernant, D. (1997). Du discours à l’action. Paris: PUF.
Wittgensteln, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee RALED the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
