Practices for promoting scientific creativity among adolescent students: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/lc29202349473Keywords:
Creativity, Adolescents, Scientific Creativity, Systematic ReviewAbstract
The goal of this study was to analyze the practices aimed at promoting scientific creativity among adolescent students, as evaluated in empirical articles published between 2018 and 2022. Research pursuits were conducted in four databases. The results revealed that the practices proved to be effective and were associated with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approaches, technological support, teaching and learning methods, and the assessment of cognitive and behavioral characteristics of students. Further research is recommended in national contexts to investigate strategies for fostering scientific creativity among adolescent students.
Downloads
References
Alencar, E. M. L. S., Braga, N. P., & Marinho, C. D. (2016). Como desenvolver o potencial criador: um guia para a liberação da criatividade em sala de aula. Vozes.
Araújo, L. S., Cruz, J. F. A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Achieving scientific excellence: An exploratory study of the role of emotional and motivational factors. High Ability Studies, 28 (2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2016.1264293
Astutik, S., Susantini, E., Madlazim, M. N., & Supeno, S. (2020). The effectiveness of collaborative creativity learning models (CCL) on secondary school scientific creativity skills. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 525-538. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13336a
Ayas, M.B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13(2), 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
Azevedo, G. T., & Maltempi, M. V. (2023). Desenvolvimento de habilidades e invenções robóticas para impactos sociais no contexto de formação em Matemática. Ciência & Educação, 29 (2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320230016
Bacich, L., & Moran, J. (2018). Metodologias Ativas para uma Educação Inovadora: Uma Abordagem Teórico-Prática. Pensa.
Barbot, B. (2018). Creativity and self-esteem in adolescence: A study of their domain specific, multivariate relationships. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.365
Beghetto, R. A., & Madison, E. (2022). Accepting the challenge: Helping schools get smarter about supporting students’ creative collaboration and communication in a changing world. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040080
Benek, I., & Akcay, B. (2022). The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students. Participatory Educational Research, 9 (2), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.27.9.2
Çalışıcı, S., & Benzer, S. (2021). The effects of STEM applications on the environmental atitudes of the 8th year students, scientific creativity and science achievements. Malasian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9 (1), 24-36. https://jml.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/28217/12738
Doğan, A., & Kahraman, E. (2021). The effect of STEM activities on the scientific creativity of middle school students. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1241-1266. https://ijci.globets.org/index.php/IJCI/article/view/638/324
Eroglu, S., & Bektas, O. (2022). The effect of STEM applications on the scientific creativity of 9th-grade students. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 8(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.1059124
Feist, G. J. (2020). Science. Em S. Pritzker & M. Runco (Orgs.) Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp. 460-466). Elsevier Academic Press.
Garcés, S. (2018). Creativity in science domains: A Reflection. Atenea, 517(1), 241-253. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/328/32865412015/html/
Glăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., Biaisi, P. M., Catherine, M. D., Georgsdottir, A., Guillou, K., Kurtag, G., Mouchiroud, C., Storme, M., Wojtczuk, A., & Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4 (176), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00176
Gök, B., & Sürmeli, H. (2022). The effect of scientific toy design activities based on the engineering design process on secondary school students’ scientific creativity. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 692-709. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.17987
Gray, S., & Morris, P. (2022). Capturing the spark: PISA, twenty-first century skills and the reconstruction of creativity. Globalisation, Societes and Education, 6 (2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2022.2100981
Haim, K., & Aschauer, K. (2022). Fostering scientific creativity in the classroom: The Concept of Flex-Based Learning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21 (3), 196-230. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.3.11
Hasancebi, F. Y., Guner, O., Kutru, C., & Hasancebi, M. (2021). Impact of Stem integrated argumentation-based inquiry applications on students ' academic success, reflective thinking and creative thinking skills. Participatory Educational Research, 8 (4),274-296. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.90.8.4
Hebebci, M. T., & Usta, E. (2022). The Effects of integrated STEM education practices on problem solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358-379. http://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.143.9.6
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
Huang, C. F., & Wang, K. C. (2019). Comparative analysis of different creativity tests for the prediction of students’scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(4), 443-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1684116
Huang, P. S., Peng, S. L., Chen, H. C., Tseng, L. C., & Hsu, L. C. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
Idoeta, P. A. (2021, novembro 15). A surpreendente queda de criatividade em adolescentes do mundo detectada pela OCDE. BBC News Brasil. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/geral-59099276
Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., Chruszczewski, M. H., & Benedek, M. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57 (2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006
Kırıcı, M. G., & Bakırcı, H. (2021). The effect of STEM supported research-inquiry-based learning approach on the scientific creativity of 7th grade students. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(2), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021067921
Kızkapan, O., & Nacaroğlu, O. (2021). An examination of relationship between gifted student’s scientific creativity and science-based entrepreneurship tendencies. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9 (1), 1-13. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11787/3621
Klahr, D. (2002). Exploring Science – The Cognition and Development of Discovery Process. Mit Press.
Kleibeuker, S. W., Stevenson, C. E., Van Der Aar, L., Overgaauw, S., Van Duijvenvoorde, A. C., & Crone, E. A. (2017). Training in the adolescent brain: An fMRI training study on divergent thinking. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 353-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000239
Koç, A., & Büyük, U. (2021). Effect of robotics technology in science education on scientific creativity and attitude development. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(1), 54-72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1303792.pdf
Lee, I., & Park, J. (2021). Student, parents and teacher perceptions on the behavioral characteristics of scientific creativity and the implications to enhances student’s scientific creativity. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.67
Newman, F., & Scurry, J. E. (2015). Higher education and the digital rapids. International Higher Education, 26(1), 13-14. https://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2002.26.6968
Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., & Ramdan, S. D. (2020). The effect of STEM-EDP in professional learning on automotive engineering competence in vocational High School Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists,8 (2), 633 – 649. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.645047
Organização das Nações Unidas (ONU). (2015). Transformando Nosso Mundo: A Agenda 2030 para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. https://nacoesunidas.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/agenda2030-pt-br.pdf
Qiang, R., Han, Q., Guo, Y., Bai, J., & Karwowski, M. (2020). Critical thinking disposition and scientific creativity: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54 (1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347
Ramnarain, U. D. (2020). Exploring the autonomy of South African school science students when doing investigative inquiries for a science fair. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9128
Redó, N. A., Gutiérrez, M. Á. M., & Cano, J. D. V. (2021). Dimensions of creativity in secondary school high-ability students. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11 (3), 953-961. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030070
Rosenzweing, E.Q., & Wigfield, A. (2016). STEM motivation interventions for adolescents: A promising start, but further to go. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1154792
Septaria, K., & Rismayanti, R. (2022). The effect of scientific approach on Junior High school students’ Scientific Creativity and Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Journal of Research and Education Studies: E-Saintika, 6(3), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.36312/esaintika.v6i3.955
Sica, L. S., Ragozini, G., Di Palma, T., & Sestito, A. L. (2017). Creativity as Identity Skill? Late adolescents' management of identity, complexity and risk‐taking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.221
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). The scientific creativity of fifth graders in a STEM project-based cooperative learning approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.627
Stretch, E. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Framing failure: Leveraging uncertainty to launch creativity in STEM education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching 7 (2), 123-133. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/45cc/ed48ffd5dcda97944876b935c19f05917350.pdf
Suarte, L. B. O., Silva, K. L. F., & Seibert, C. S. (2021). O PISA como instrumento de análise das ciências no contexto da saúde ambiental, no âmbito internacional e nacional. Revista Humanidades e Inovação, 8(39), 309-321. https://revista.unitins.br/index.php/humanidadeseinovacao/article/view/4190
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: the impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(1), 1871-1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
Suyidno, S., Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Misbah, M., Sunarti, T. & Dwikoranto, D. (2019). Increasing students’responsibility and scientific creativity through Creative Responsibility Based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(2), 178–188. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpfa/article/view/5807
Tambunan, H. (2019). The effectiveness of the problem-solving strategy and the scientific approach to students’ mathematical capabilities in high order thinking skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14 (2), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
Tang, C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Personal characteristics that distinguish creative scientists from less creative scientists. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(3), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.99
Van der Zanden, P. J. A. C., Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence: Where is the social context? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702
Vries, H. B., & Lubart, T. (2017). Scientific Creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184
Wai, J., & Brown, M. I. (2021). Developmental histories facilitating the emergence of creative scientific expertise: The role of developed cognitive talents, education, and social and cultural contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716529
Yildirim, M., Çalik, M., & Özmen, H. (2016). A Meta-synthesis of Turkish studies in science process skills. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(14), 6518-6539. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1115726.pdf
Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent thinking moderates the relationship between divergent thinking and scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31 (3), 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Suellen Cristina Rodrigues Kotz, Asdrúbal Borges Formiga-Sobrinho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
-Authors maintains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication, the work being simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-Authorers are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
