IDEÓFONOS EN SHIPIBO-KONIBO (PANO)

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rbla.v18i1.59722

Palavras-chave:

shipibo-konibo, ideófonos, estrategias evidenciales, morfo-fonología, morfosintaxis, expresividad, integración morfosintáctica

Resumo

O presente artigo fornece a primeira descrição semântica, morfofonológica e morfossintática aprofundada dos ideofones em Shipibo-Konibo. Desta forma, este artigo contribui com novas análises dentro do quadro conceitual escolhido, como a noção de estratégias evidenciais, e novos dados para esta esfera da língua Shipibo-Konibo. Além disso, o artigo propõe a identificação de novos morfemas, bem como novas funções de construções já conhecidas da língua. Dessa forma, este artigo ajuda a compreender melhor a estrutura da língua Shipibo-Konibo, os diferentes recursos linguísticos para marcar a expressividade e os diferentes níveis de integração morfofonológica e morfossintática.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Akita, Kimi and Prashant Pardeshi. 2019. Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Akita, Kimi. 2009. A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Japanese Mimetics. Tesis de doctorado. Kobe University.

Anderson, Gregory D. S. 2009. Auxiliary Verb Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Bahón Arnaiz, Cristina. 2022. Un análisis lingüístico de los ideófonos coreanos en un fragmento de un cuento de Park Min-Gyu. In Estudios de Asia y África, vol. 57, núm. 1 (177), pp. 5-32

Bakker, Peter. 2006. Algonquian verb structure: Plains Cree. In Grażyna J. Rowicka; Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, pp. 3-27. Utrecht: LOT.

Brinton, Laurel J., and Elizabeth Traugott. C. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge University Press.

Camargo, Eliane, and Sabine Reiter 2021. Reflexes of the Cashinahuas’ relationship with their environment. Maloca - Revista de Estudos Indígenas, Campinas, SP v. 4, p. 01-43

Carlin, Eithne B. 2006. The verbalizers in Trio (Cariban): a semantic description. In Grażyna J. Rowicka; Eithne B. Carlin (eds.), What’s in a verb? Studies in the verbal morphology of the languages of the Americas, pp. 143-157. Utrecht: LOT.

Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. “Notes on Expressive Meaning”. En Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistics Society, editado por Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi y Gloria C. Phares, 440-447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.

Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. “Advances in the Cross-Linguistic Study of Ideophones”. Language and Linguistics Compass 6 (10): 654-672.

Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. “Arbitrariness, Iconicity, and Systematicity in Language”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603-615.

Dingemanse, Mark 2017. Expressiveness and system integration. On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF — Language Typology and Universals, 70(2): 363-384

Dingemanse, Mark and Kimi Akita 2016. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 53(3), 501-532

Dixon, Robert. M. W. 2008. Deriving verbs in English. Language Sciences 30: 31-52.

Doke, Clement M. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. Londres: Longmans, Green, and Co.

Elías-Ulloa, José. 2011. Una documentación acústica de la lengua shipibo-conibo (pano). (Con un bosquejo fonológico). Lima: PUCP, 329 pp

Fawcett, Alexia. 2018. Ideophone integration and expressiveness in Wao Terero. MA Thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.

Fillmore, Charles. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech. Volume 280: 20-32.

Fillmore, Charles. 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981 (p. 111). Seoul: Hanshin Pub. Co.

Fleck, David W. 2003. A grammar of Matses. PhD thesis. Rice University.

Fleck, David W. 2023. Reanalysis of Shipibo Stress Motivated By New Data on Prefixation. International Journal of American Linguistics, Volume 89, Number 2

Fleck, David. 2022. Why is matses an onomatopoetic language? Anthropological linguistics 64(1-2):1-35

Floyd, Rick. 1999. The structure of evidential categories in Wanka Quechua. Summer Institute of Linguistics.

Guirardello-Damian, Raquel. "Reduplication and ideophones in Trumai." Reduplication in indigenous languages of South America. Brill, 2014. 217-246

Hinton, Leanne., Johanna. Nichols, and John J. Ohala. 1994. Sound Symbolism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Jendraschek, Gerd. 2011. Subordinate, Embedded, and Dependent Clauses. A Terminological Confusion that Iatmul Can Help Disentangle. Handout for a public lecture given on 17 July 2007 at the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Kwon, Nahyun. 2019. Cross-linguistic variation in phonaesthemic canonicity, with special reference to Korean and English. En Akita y P. Pardeshi (Eds.). Ideophones, mimetics, and expressives. pp. 77-99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Lehmann, Christian. 2004. Nexion – Complex sentences. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt. Linn.

Lima-Kaxinawá (De), Joaquim Paulo, 2014. Uma gramática da língua Hãtxa Kuin. Tesis doctoral. Brasilia: Universidade de Brasília.

Loriot, James, Erwin Lauriault, and Dwight Day. 2008 (First edition 1993). Diccionario Shipibo-Castellano. Serie Lingüística Peruana N.31

Meng, Chenxi. 2012. A description of ideophonic words in Mandarin Chinese. M.A. thesis, Leiden University.

Michael, Lev D. 2008. Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge, and social action in an Amazonian society. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Mihas, Elena. 2012. Ideophones in Alto Perené (Arawak) from Eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36:2, 300–344.

Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999 The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology. vol. 28. 225-252.

Nuckolls, Janis B. 2014. Ideophones challenges for typological linguistics: The case of Pastaza Quichua. Pragmatics and Society, ed. Katherine Lahti, Rusty Barrett, Anthony Webster. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. vol. 5, 355-383

Nuckolls, Janis B. 2015. The sound symbolism of self in innovative naming practices in an African-American community. Language Variety in the South: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, 492-504.

Nuckolls, Janis B., Joseph Stanley, Roseanna Hopper and Elizabeth Nielsen. 2016. The systematic stretching and contracting of ideophonic phonology in Pastaza Quichua. International Journal of American Linguistics, vol 82, number 1, 95-116.

Nuckolls, Janis B and Tod D. Swanson. 2018. Respectable uncertainty and pathetic truth in Amazonian Quichua speaking culture. Interdisciplinary Approaches to metacognitive diversity, ed. Martin Fortier and Joelle Proust. 170-192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nuckolls, Janis B. 2019a. How do you even know what ideophones mean? Gestures contributions to ideophone semantics in Pastaza Quichua. Gesture Vol. 19:2/3. 161–195

Nuckolls, Janis B. 2019b. The sensori-semantic clustering of ideophonic meaning in Pastaza Quichua, ed. Kimi Akita, and Prashant Pardeshi. Ideophones, mimetics, and expressives. 167-198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Oisel, Guillaume. 2013. Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire. Étude diachronique et synchronique. Thèse de doctorat. Université Sorbonne-Nouvelle, Paris 3 / Laboratoire du LACITO - CNRS.

Oisel, Guillaume. 2017a. Re-evaluation of the evidential system of Lhasa Tibetan and its atypical functions. Himalayan Linguistics 16(2) : 90-128.

Oisel, Guillaume. 2017b On the origin of the Lhasa Tibetan evidentials song and byung. In Lauren Gawne & Nathan W. Hill (eds.) Evidential systems of Tibetan languages, 161-183. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Oisel, Guillaume. 2024. Evidentiality in Middle Classical Tibetan. Cahier de linguistique d’Asie orientale. Vol. 53. 68-138.

Reiter, Sabine. 2024. The multi-modal representation of motion events in Awetí discourse, CogniTextes [En linea], Volume 9 [ultimo acceso 21/03/2024]

Rose, Françoise. 2024. "Teko ideophones: description of a word class." Linguistic Typology at the Crossroads 4.1, 91-146.

Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2019. What is nominalization? Towards the theoretical foundations of nominalization, ed. Zariquiey, Masayoshi Shibatani, and David Fleck. W. Nominalization in Languages of the Americas. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company (TSL 124).

Shinohara, Kazuko, Kimi Akita, Masako Hiraga, and William J. Herlofsky. 2015. Iconicity: East Meets West. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 279 p.

Tournadre N., 2004. Typologie des aspects et théorie du TAM, Bulletin de la Société de linguistique de Paris, t.XCIX (2004), fasc.I, p.7-68

Tournadre, Nicolas and Randy J. Lapolla. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality: Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 240-263

Valenzuela, Pilar. 2003. Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. Ph.D dissertation. Eugene: University of Oregon.

Zariquiey, Roberto, Guillaume Oisel, Amelia Torres Zambrano, Jorge Eduardo Sato Ruiz, Carlos Gonzalo González Pinedo, Víctor Raúl Paredes Estela, Nazario Aguirre Baique, and Edwin Julio Palomino Cadenas. 2020. How to commentate a soccer match in Shipibo-Konibo (Pano)? LIAMES, Campinas, sp, v. 20, 1–17

Zariquiey, Roberto. 2011. A grammar of Kashibo-Kakataibo. PhD thesis. La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

Zariquiey, Roberto. 2015. Bosquejo gramatical de la lengua Iskonawa. Latinoamericana Editores/CELACP / Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana. Lima / Boston.

Zeisler, Bettina. 2022. "Evidential-perceptual transfer by a blind speaker? Or: what do the Ladakhi markers for “visual” and “non-visual” perceptual experience, ḥdug and rag, actually encode?" Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, vol. 9, no. 1-2, 131-157.

Zemp, Marius. 2018. A Grammar of Purik Tibetan. Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library, 21; Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-04-16

Como Citar

Oisel, G., Zariquiey, R., Acosta Bautista, L., Bernabé Ruiz, L. E., & Galloso Cossios, R. S. (2026). IDEÓFONOS EN SHIPIBO-KONIBO (PANO). Revista Brasileira De Linguística Antropológica, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.26512/rbla.v18i1.59722