Deixis in narrative: a study of Kamaiurá, a TupíGuaraní language of Upper Xingu, Brazil

Autores

  • Gerd Carling Lund University/Universidade Brasília
  • Sandra Cronhamn Universidade de Brasília
  • Wary Kamaiurá Universidade de Brasília
  • Elis Jarl Skute Universidade de Brasília

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rbla.v9i1.19104

Palavras-chave:

Linguística Antropológica

Resumo

The current paper describes the deictic system of Kamaiurá, a language of the Tupí-Guaraní family. The Kamaiurá system of deictic demonstratives and adverbials has a high degree of complexity, including at least 17 different forms, of which several have different functions. The system codes four levels of Participant deixis, with proximal, medial, distal and far distal deixis. Forms can also code anaphora and highly specialized locations of the referent, such as ‘moving away’ and ‘located beside something’. A further peculiar and unusual characteristic of the Kamaiurá system is the coding of Modal and Evidential deixis, which is found among the forms marking far distal deixis. Our study has two foci: the first part describes the system in its independent or exophoric use, and this part is based on deep interviews with native speakers and a deixis elicitation study. The second part of the paper represents the core of our study. Here, we investigate the uses of the deictic system in a recorded frog story, looking at anaphoric and cataphoric usages of the forms as well as how they are used to mark topic and focus in the narrative discourse. The text is very rich in deictic forms, and out of the 17 different forms recorded for Kamaiurá, 9 occur in our frog story. We notice a tendency where the hierarchy of increasing distance from the ego in the independent forms is transferred into increasing focus of the narrative. Epistemic modality of the independent forms is used to mark uncertainty in the narrative, i.e., to indicate lack of terms for a specific item, whereas anaphoric deixis of the independent forms marks general reference in the narrative.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The languages of the amazon: New York, NY: Oxford

University Press, 2012. Non-fiction.

Berman, Ruth Aronson, Dan Isaac Slobin, and Ayhan Aksu-Koç. 1994. Relating events

in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study: Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates ; New York : Psychology Press, 1994.

Burenhult, Niclas. 2008. “Spatial coordinate systems in demonstrative meaning.”

Linguistic Typology (12):99-142. Doi: 10.1515/LITY.2008.032.

Burenhult, Niclas. in press. “The Jahai multi-term demonstrative system ”“ what’s

spatial about it?” In Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, edited by S. C.

Levinson, S. Cutfield, M. Dunn, N. Enfield, S. Meira and D. Wilkins. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives [Elektronisk resurs] form, function, and

grammaticalization. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.

Diessel, Holger. 2011. “Deixis Demonstratives”. In Semantics: An International

Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, edited by Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von

Heusinger and Paul Portner, 2407-2432. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter Mouton.

Diessel, Holger. 2014. “Demonstratives, frames of reference, and semantic universals

of space.” Language and Linguistics Compass 8 (3):116-132. Doi: 10.1111/

lnc3.12066.

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010a. Basic linguistic theory [Elektronisk resurs]. Vol. 2,

Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010b. Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 2, Grammatical topics.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dixon, Robert M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 3, Further grammatical topics.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drude, Sebastian. 2011. “Aweti in relation with Kamayrá. The two Tupian languages

of the Upper Xingu.” In Alto Xingu. Uma Sociedade Multilíngue, edited by Bruna

Franchetto, 155-192. Rio de Janeiro: Museu do Ãndio - Funai.

Duchan, Judith F. 1995. Deixis in narrative : a cognitive science perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Frawley, William. 1992. Linguistic semantics: Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates.

Galbraith, Mary. 1995. “Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative.”

In Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective, edited by Judith F. Duchan,

Gail A. Bruder and Lyne E. Hewitt, 19-60. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

Gumperz, John Joseph, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1997. Rethinking linguistic relativity,

Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language: 17: Cambridge:

Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997. Non-fiction.

Hanks, WilliamF. 2005. “Explorations in the Deictic Field.” 191.

Hegarty, Michael. 2016. Modality and Propositional Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols, and John J. Ohala. 1995. Sound Symbolism

[Elektronisk resurs]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jensen, Cheryl. 1999. “Tupí-Guaraní.” In The Amazonian Languages, edited by R.

M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 125-164. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Johansson, Niklas. 2014. “Tracking Linguistic Primitives: The Phonosemantic

Realization of Fundamental Oppositional Pairs.” MA, Centre for Lagnuages and

Literature, Lund University.

Johansson, Niklas, and Gerd Carling. 2015. “The de-iconization and rebuilding of

iconicity in spatial deixis.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of

Linguistics 47 (1):4.

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition : explorations in cognitive

diversity, Language, culture and cognition: 5: Cambridge : Cambridge University

Press.

Mayer, Mercer. 1967. A boy, a dog and a frog. New York: Penguin.

Mushin, Ilana. 2000. “Evidentiality and deixis in narrative retelling.” Journal of

Pragmatics 32:927-957. Doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00085-5.

Ozcaliskan, Seyda, and Dan Isaac Slobin. 1999. “Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston

University Conference on Language Development.” In Proceedings of the Boston

University Conference on Language Development., edited by Annabel Greenhill,

Heather Littlefield and Cheryl Tano, 541-552. Boston: Cascadilla Press.

Palmer, Frank Robert. 2001. Mood and modality, Cambridge textbooks in linguistics:

Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 2. ed.

Rodrigues, Aryon D. I., and Ana S. A. C. Cabral. 2012. “Tupían.” In The Indigenous

Languages of South America: A Comprehensive Guide, edited by Lyle Campbell

and Verónica Grondona, 59-166. Berlin - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Seki, Lucy. 2000. Gramática do Kamaiurá. Lingua Tupi-Guarani do Alto Xingu.

Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.

Sidnell, Jack, and N.J. Enfield. 2017. “Deixis and the interactional foundations of

reference.” In Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Yan Huang. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Strömqvist, Sven, and Ludo Th Verhoeven. 2004. Relating events in narrative: Mahwah,

N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, cop.

Webber, Bonnie L. 1997. “Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse

Deixis.”

Downloads

Publicado

2017-09-22

Como Citar

Carling, G., Cronhamn, S., Kamaiurá, W., & Skute, E. J. (2017). Deixis in narrative: a study of Kamaiurá, a TupíGuaraní language of Upper Xingu, Brazil. Revista Brasileira De Linguística Antropológica, 9(1), 13–48. https://doi.org/10.26512/rbla.v9i1.19104

Edição

Seção

Artigos